Home > 2011 > Personal Finance

Consumers Be Damned: Senator Shelby, Captain Queeg and the Politics of No

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 3 Comments

Last week’s Senate Banking Committee hearing on the nomination of Richard Cordray to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau featured prepared speeches that were utterly without sound and fury but still managed to do a huge disservice to American consumers. It felt like a really bad Capitol Hill reality show, devoid of all emotion, featuring actors who made Snookie and the Situation seem like “clean” coal shills at a global warming conference.

Confirmation hearings are generally only for the true political junkie, and this was no exception. Occasionally a Cordray supporter would say something intelligent, and it was clear that there are some Senators who are serious about getting Cordray confirmed so the CFPB can begin its sorely needed work. However, during most of the confirmation, there was a sort of institutional narcissism at work rendering the nominee’s presence virtually irrelevant. Sen. Richard Shelby—the ranking Republican on the committee who thus had the right to speak immediately after the Chairman finished—was to blame for this, by asserting at the outset that the hearing was “premature.”

[Article: Is Richard Cordray the New Elizabeth Warren?]

Forty-four Republican Senators vowed to block anyone unless and until they were satisfied that Congress would have real control over the corporation-killing, lefty jabberwocky sired by those scourges of economic growth, Senator Dodd and Representative Frank. Senator Shelby rounded up the GOP’s usual suspects: President Obama, the Democrats, and even the structure of the agency itself (more organization = more government = bureaucratic tyranny = higher taxes thereby imperiling recovery), and more or less renewed his vow on cable TV to block the nominee, stopping just short of using the word “filibuster.”

It was a graphic demonstration of what matters most in Washington these days: that one party shamelessly and steadfastly seeks to thwart the initiatives of the other party—and, of course, to depose its leader—irrespective of right or wrong, or the needs of the American people.

[Featured Product: Looking for credit cards for bad credit?]

There is nothing terribly “political” about Cordray’s nomination. No one said he’s not qualified for the job (he is widely respected by partisans on both sides of the aisle in Ohio). Only the corporations-are-people crowd disputes the need for a federal consumer protection bureau (if only to unify and simplify the existing hodgepodge of state regulations and overlapping federal agency authority). Everyone knows the CFPB will be focused on promoting financial education, rooting out predatory practices and modernizing outdated regulatory approaches.

Unfortunately, Richard Cordray is but the latest pawn in the partisan gamesmanship that is progressively killing America. It’s not a good game of chess. It’s a bad game of chicken. If the full faith and credit of the United States can be held hostage, as it was during the debt ceiling faux-crisis, what else could Cordray expect from these hearings?

While the pachyderms fiddle, the homeland is burning. Many argue the federal government needs to be checked and balanced. Last week, before a joint session of Congress the President pointed out the existence of 500 federal laws or regulations that were unduly complicated or burdensome. No doubt there are a whole lot more than that. Frankly (no pun intended), the Dodd-Frank Act, clearly a work in progress, needs work itself. But the CFPB is necessary, now.

[Resource: Get your free Credit Report Card]

Consumers Be Damned (cont.) »

Image: 35 Summers, via Flickr.com

Pages: 1 2

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://bobbyshead.blogspot.com Bobby Kearan

    Thank you for a great article and some wonderful lines!

    You are, of course, absolutely correct in your analysis of the Party of No.

  • C. Wright

    Clearly Mr. Levin is a democrat and this article was very slanted. Mr. Kearan also needs to get his bipartisonship in check. You both are doing the same thing you are bashing the boys in Washington for. This isn’t about Cordray or the confirmation, I am neither a dem or a rep and I despise the Dodd-Frank Act and everything associated with it, including the CFPB. However, I do agree there has to be rules and regulations to protect consumers from making horrible mistakes at the hands of those who would deceive. People who have actually read Dodd-Frank and understand what it will do, have to agree that it will actually hurt consumers and make it even more difficult to obtain financing, not to mention putting even more Americans out of work. Most of the folks in Washington are so far removed from “reality”, they do not understand what happened with the housing crisis. They just want to point fingers and say bad Lenders and Brokers. Lenders and Brokers control nothing. Washington won’t take personal responsibility, and they think the fix is to regulate the Lenders and Brokers in this country out of business. All of the posturing and their creation of MORE government agencies with consumer friendly names, looks good to the naive public. The housing crisis was directly caused by Greed. The acceptance of certain types of loans and practices by FNMA (government), FHLMC (government) and Wall Street. If you are going to pay top dollar for a certain loan product with certain characteristics, you are going to get them, lots of them. The Lenders and Brokers would have never originated them or had any interest in them if the government and Wall Street didn’t create a market for them. I for one am not fooled, and Barney Frank was directly involved in the creation of the housing crisis and should not be able to cover up his errors with laws and regulations that will kill the financial industry. Let’s get together as a country and come up with something better, using ideas and input from the industry they are attempting to regulate and kill.

  • Larry K

    As a Republican turned independent I take no solace from either party. The Democrats have not had good proposals to solve or even address the foreclosure problem. Ask the 32 California Democrat congress members who sent an angry letter to the President last week regarding the Administration’s lack of action. The bailout in 2008-09 did not solve unemployment, hold Wall Street accountable, or help ordinary Americans deal with mortgage problems. Clearly the bickering by both parties (eg Senator Shelby) only breeds my own cynicism at the failures of both partirs and both branches of government.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team