Home > 2011 > Mortgages

FICO Releases Research to Profile Strategic Defaulters

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

Default_dreamstime_8425439Many of us probably know someone who has lost their home in this economic downturn, and therefore can empathize with whatever situation—whether they lost their job or were a victim of predatory lending—made it nearly impossible for them to stay current on their credit obligations (mortgage as well as credit cards, auto loans, etc.).

At the same time, there are a growing number of “strategic defaulters” or “walkaways” who, it could be argued, garner less sympathy. Approximately 35% of mortgage defaults were strategic defaulters in September 2010, according to the University of Chicago Booth School of Business—up from 26% in March 2009. These are people who stop making payments on their mortgage despite having the financial ability to make the payments. This is particularly associated with the situation where the loan amount is considerably higher than the value of the property. The property has negative equity or is “underwater”—and in many cases is expected to remain so for the foreseeable future.

[Consumer resource: Take the Debt Diet Challenge with Jean Chatzky and Credit.com]

For example, the median home price in Merced, California, was $116,000 in the first quarter of 2011—down 68% from its peak in 2006, according to a recent USA Today article.  Three of five homeowners with a mortgage in Merced owe more on their loans than their houses are worth, compared with about one in five nationally.   Some of these people will likely make the “strategic” decision to walk away from the property even though they have the ability to make the payment.  They are willing to accept how this decision will affect their credit score (up to a 150-point drop in a FICO score), which will make it difficult for them to get affordable credit in the near future.

Take heed, new analytics are being developed and tested that help lenders identify likely strategic defaulters before they hand over the keys to the house.

FICO has just announced the development of a new analytic solution lenders can use to identify mortgage loan holders who are most likely to walk away from the loan.  If mortgage servicers adopt the solution, they can more accurately identify the potential strategic defaulter before he/she walks away, and intervene to educate them on the negative ramifications of walking away, as well as pointing them to alternative solutions to modify their loans.

[Article: Strategic Default and the Morality of Walking Away]

FICO research found that the credit profile of the strategic defaulter differs from how general defaulters have managed their credit prior to defaulting.  They tend to have:

  • Higher FICO scores
  • Lower utilization on their credit cards/less likely to be overlimit
  • Less retail credit balances
  • Shorter time living in the property (less established roots in community/less equity in home)
  • Active opening of new credit in most recent 6 months

The growing trend of consumers walking away from their mortgage obligation has several negative impacts:

  • For the strategic defaulter, it will negatively impact his/her credit score—increasing the cost of credit and potentially other living expenses (rent, insurance, etc.).
  • If you reside in a recourse state, servicers that sell a foreclosed property for less than the amount owed on the mortgage can still pursue the defaulter for the difference.
  • The ability to purchase a new home in the foreseeable future is affected. According to policy changes announced by Fannie Mae in July 2010, defaulting borrowers who walk away but had the capacity to pay or did not complete a modification alternative in good faith will be ineligible for a new Fannie Mae-backed mortgage loan for seven years from the date of foreclosure (borrowers who have extenuating circumstances may be eligible for new loan in a shorter timeframe).
  • The decision to walk away from a mortgage loan also negatively impacts the local community by increasing vacancy rates, reducing the tax base and further stagnating economic recovery.

Strategic defaults have negative impacts for servicers, investors, borrowers and the community as a whole.  Hopefully these new predictive analytics will help servicers identify potential strategic defaulters before it is too late to take alternative actions that can have a more positive outcome for everyone.

[Article: 8 Tips to Make Your Mortgage Process Easier]

Image © Torian Dixon | Dreamstime.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team