Home > Personal Finance > The Future of U.S. Health Care? FSAs & HSAs

Comments 0 Comments

With the election of Donald Trump as president, the future of Obamacare is uncertain. But whatever changes come to the way Americans pay for health care, one thing seems certain: A growing number will pay with their own money using pre-tax dollars through health savings accounts or flexible spending accounts. Already, there are nearly 65 million so-called “account-based health plans” in use, and as their number continues to soar, so too will confusion around the tax-friendly-but-red-tape-heavy health care payment plans.

While these two ways to pay sound similar, they are very different, and these distinctions matter a lot to both your health care and your financial future. So, here’s a bit of history.

FSAs & HSAs: A Primer

Flexible Spending Accounts, which date back to the 1970s, let workers set aside money from each paycheck to pay for out-of-pocket health care costs throughout the year. About 35 million Americans use an FSA, according to the Employers Council on Flexible Compensation.

Their cousin in savings-based health care spending, the Health Savings Account, is a far more recent invention. More like an IRA for lifetime health care costs, they came to be in experimental form under Bill Clinton’s watch in 1996 as part of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA). But they weren’t available to the general public until George Bush signed the law that expanded Medicare in 2003. Today, their popularity is soaring, in large part because of the growth of high-deductible (patient unfriendly) health care plans. While there were only 10 million HSA users in 2010, they are predicted to hit 30 million accounts by 2018, according to Devenir.com. Collectively, some $50 billion will be saved in HSAs by then.

There are other forms of account-based health care plans – sometimes called Health Reimbursement Arrangements or Healthcare Reimbursement Plans. But those accounts are owned by employers. To keep things focused, we will only discuss individual-owned plans here. (If you are really curious, Zanebenefits.com has a nice comparison chart.)

Get used to paying for health care with individual accounts, experts say, no matter what happens to Obamacare.

“The new users are active spenders, involved in how their health care dollars are spent and looking for the most effective way to use their health care account balances. The Affordable Care Act is in part responsible for the wave of new users,” said Sarah Grotta, an analyst with Mercator, and author of a new report titled “The Growing Importance of Healthcare Accounts”. “Survival of the ACA is in question after the presidential election, but the use of healthcare accounts has been considered positive and will likely be front and center as new health care policies emerge.”

Consumers have mixed feelings about account-based health plans. The tax savings can be substantial, but so can the red tape — and the rules.

This time of year, many workers have just finished declaring their deductions for flexible spending accounts (election windows vary but are generally range from October to November). That means they were busy doing back-of-the-envelope calculations to guess how much they’ll spend on health care in the next year — and deciding how much of their paychecks they’ll siphon off into the account, up to $2,600. And as the year ends, they’re also popping into eyeglass stores and other covered providers, looking to spend leftover funds from 2016 contributions that may be subject to a use-it-or-lose it rule.

Health Savings Accounts don’t come with the use-it-or-lose it strings attached. Consumers who keep their money in an HSA can withdraw it to pay for health care costs at any time. And the savings can be invested, similar to an IRA. That makes them a much better deal, says Desmond Henry, a Kansas-based financial adviser.

Many consumers don’t understand this critical distinction, however.

“They are really confusing,” said Henry, in an interview with Credit.com. “I have clients I meet with all the time, they come in and a lot of times they generalize. They think they have a health savings account, but you go and look and it’s an FSA, and then you realize they didn’t spend all the money and they lost it. It’s a common problem.”

The rules for how accounts can be funded and spent can be even more confusing. There are no income limits to an HSA (unlike an IRA), theoretically, and any individual can invest up to $3,400 during 2017. But only consumers on high-deductible health care plans are eligible.

Some of the biggest gripes against flexible spending accounts have been addressed when spending rules were relaxed in 2013. Employers can now allow workers to carry over $500 annually (though that’s only an option, check with your employer). Also, the IRS eased up on the “spend by Dec. 31” rule; consumers now have into March to spend last year’s money. So there’s no need to run out right now and buy a $500 humidifier before Dec. 31 (as one of my readers did not long ago).

Also, reimbursement has gotten easier for some patients. Instead of mailing in paper claims, many consumers can now spend the money using a prepaid card.

Count Christine Zeman, a New Jersey mom, among the crowd of FSA fans.

“(They’re) great. Pre-tax money for contact lenses, insurance co-pays, prescription meds,” she wrote on my Facebook page. “I used it for orthodontics — paid for two sets of braces so far, spread over a couple years each.”

Josh Belzman of Seattle has more mixed feelings.

“A lot of stuff you’d think would be covered isn’t, or stores don’t accept the card, and it’s dumb you have to guess what you’ll use or lose it, though you can now carry over more. Still a pretty hackneyed system,” he wrote.

Which Is Better?

HSAs have an important feature that’s a big benefit over FSAs — contributions can be changed at any time. With an FSA, employees generally can’t change their monthly contribution once it’s set during the election period (Exceptions can be made for major life events, like the birth of a child).

Frustration with that restriction is one reason for HSA’s meteoric rise. Trade group America’s Health Insurance Plans says that while only 1 million people were enrolled in HSAs in 2005, that number had swelled to 10 million by 2010, and almost 20 million by 2015.

Their biggest attraction, however, is what some analyst call their triple tax benefit: The money can be contributed tax-free, lowering a consumer’s annual tax bill; if invested, it can grow tax-free; and it can be withdrawn to pay for health care expenses tax-free.

“Love my HSA. I got mine directly at a bank,” wrote Frank Miceli to me. “Money can stay in it and be invested. No ‘use it or lose it’ like an FSA. The money is your savings.”

Employers like the HSA model because it softens the blow of offering cheaper (but unpopular with workers) high-deductible health care plan. And, like a 401K, money used to fund an HSA can come from the worker, the employer, or both. In 2015, 32% of all HSA dollars contributed to an HSA account came from an employer, Zenefits.com says.

Henry says that there’s a hidden benefit to HSAs. They can act like an additional retirement savings account. Workers lucky enough to be maxing out contributions to IRAs or 401Ks should fully fund their HSAs, he said.

“If you are nearing retirement, and maxing out your 401K, this enables you another way to put money away and use it for health care in retirement,” he said. The money can only be used tax-free for health care costs, but have no fear: they will come.

One concern that many health care consumers are likely to overlook with health savings accounts are the investment costs. Much like a 401K, HSAs offer limited investment options, and they may include high fees, like any mutual fund. Consumers worried about doctor bills are unlikely to prioritize researching mutual fund expense ratios, but they need to. Understandably, many consumers take the easiest option for setting up an HSA — through their employer’s offering, for example — but consumers can shop around and obtain an HSA from any provider they choose.

For the long haul, it’s best to pick simple investment options, like low-cost index fund mutual funds. But remember, if you feel pretty certain you’ll need access to the money in the near term, you should keep it in cash, preferably in an FDIC-insured savings account. Otherwise, if your health care emergency comes during a stock market downturn, you’ll have an even bigger headache to worry about.

You can track your financial goals, like building a good credit score, for free every 14 days on Credit.com.

Image: izusek

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team