Home > Identity Theft > 3 Things to Consider After the Latest Yahoo Breach

Comments 0 Comments

No payment card or banking information was compromised in the latest 1 billion-user breach at Yahoo, according to expert reports. But what if there had been? The truth is that for most users it would be annoying, but not the end of the world.

So, why is this big news?

First of all, Yahoo can now claim two of the biggest security breaches in history. It is noteworthy that such a distinction should be attributable to a single entity. The response to the latest breach news has been huge. Ask any three experts and you’ll probably get three different figures, but according to ZDNet, the users exposed in the two Yahoo breaches exceed the total number of records compromised between 2005 and 2013 by nearly double.

“We believe that the August 2013 incident is likely distinct from the incident we disclosed on September 22, 2016,” a Yahoo spokesperson said. However, “there is some overlap in the population of potentially affected users accounts across the 2013 and 2014 events,” according to a source familiar with the situation.

The post-breach news commentaries have been many and various. There are some experts who advocate foregoing any digital connection to the security-challenged giant. Others predict that the latest bad news will negatively impact Yahoo’s sale to Verizon further, if not kill it. Within days of the breach, there were various articles advising how you could replace Yahoo services and delete your Yahoo account. That said, Yahoo is not the problem per se.

First of all, let’s be crystal clear: This latest news does not refer the to 500 million Yahoo users who were affected by the breach reported this September. While there may be some overlap, this is a different breach with different issues. It occurred way back in 2013, but that’s not really even the bad news here, though, yes, it is less than awesome that user information — including poorly encrypted security questions and passwords that could be used in an account takeover — has been out there for three years.

The bad news here is not limited to the fact that Yahoo didn’t know about this breach until law enforcement officials told the company that their stolen user data was offered for sale on the dark web. The bad news is not even, as PC World reported, that in a separate incident an intruder was able to crack Yahoo’s proprietary code and forge cookies, which would allow a hacker to get access to user information without a password. This last frightening bit of news seems to be related to the state-sponsored hack reported in September.

The bad news here is that this unsettling state of affairs — of having your information out there at the fingertips of bad players looking to make a quick buck — is not confined to Yahoo users. The real bad news is that we are all willing and/or unwitting conspirators in the exploitation of our own information, which has been sloshing around the hold of a virtual — and somewhat unmanned — freighter for years.

It Always Already Happened

There is, however, a bit of good news here. There are ways you can better protect yourself. All the subscriptions to identity theft monitoring cannot replace your active participation in your own defense. You are your best guardian.

Whether or not you choose to stay with Yahoo, it’s a good idea to change your behavior to stay safe, and that means changing your outlook and approach to the digital world. The main point is this: We are always about to “get got.” You don’t need breaking news coverage to know that you are exposed. With literally billions of compromised files floating around, you have to be exceedingly lucky not to be within easy reach of a sticky-fingered thief looking to make bank at your inconvenience.

While there is no way out of the information inferno we all inhabit, there is a way to live in it peaceably. I go into the details more thoroughly in my book, “Swiped: How to Protect Yourself in a World Full of Scammers, Phishers, and Identity Thieves,” but the basics of the practice I explain there can be summed up by three Ms: Minimize, Monitor and Manage.

Minimize Your Risk of Exposure: This can be anything from how you use the internet to what you choose to carry in your wallet. The goal is to decrease your attackable surface.

Monitor Your Identity: Get a free copy of your credit reports from each of the major credit reporting agencies at least once a year (some states permit more than one) at AnnualCreditReport.com. Consider subscribing to a credit and identity monitoring service. Set up transaction notices with your bank and credit card accounts, and pay attention. If you stay on top of things, you make it harder for crooks to get a foothold into your financial life. And if you have reason to believe you’ve been the victim of identity theft — unexplained accounts and mysterious addresses are two warning signs — don’t ignore it. You can view two of your free credit scores, updated every 14 days, on Credit.com.

Manage the Damage: Notify the authorities if you have become a victim. Get an identity theft incident report that you can use to straighten out your credit and identity issues. Check with your insurance agent, financial services rep or the human resources department where you work to see if they offer an identity theft protection services program and if you are enrolled. You may be pleasantly surprised to learn that they do and you are enrolled free, or can access it at a discount as a perk of your relationship. You may also want to consider freezing or placing a fraud alert on your credit as well, depending on what’s been compromised.

Never forget — the ultimate guardian of the consumer is the consumer, and no one has a bigger stake in protecting your economic security and well-being than you.

Image: sturti

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other sponsored content on Credit.com are Partners with Credit.com. Credit.com receives compensation if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any financial products or cards offered.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team