Home > Credit Score > 6 Mistakes People Make When Disputing Errors on Their Credit Reports

Comments 0 Comments

In order to remove mistakes or clear up unsubstantiated information in your credit report, you’ll need to dispute the information, which is every consumer’s right under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). However, disputing errors on your credit reports the wrong way could be damaging or ineffective. (If you need help writing a dispute, consider using this sample dispute letter as a reference.)

It’s important to note that repairing your credit is something you can hire a professional to help you with, or something you can do on your own for free. Either way, if you’re in the process of disputing problems on your credit reports, these are six mistakes you’ll want to avoid.

1. Not Knowing What Exactly Is on Your Credit Reports

The first step to preparing your dispute is having copies of your credit reports. You can get free copies of your credit reports once per year by going to AnnualCreditReport.com. But many people make the mistake of only getting a report from one of the three main credit bureaus — Equifax, Experian and TransUnion — because they assume the information is the same across the board. This isn’t the case, so it’s important you look at all three reports so you know what is on each, what needs to disputed and with whom.

2. Not Being Clear in Your Dispute

You need to be specific when submitting your dispute — the credit bureaus receive many disputes and don’t have the time to decipher your request. A big mistake is “either not being clear about what item is being disputed and why you’re disputing it,” according to credit expert John Ulzheimer, formerly of FICO and Equifax. “You see a lot of stuff like this… ‘I don’t agree with the information on my credit report, please correct it.’ That’s unclear and the credit bureaus can’t reasonably infer what you’re disputing and why.”

Note: If you make your dispute online, it’s important to be aware that you are subject to arbitration clauses, which could undercut your efforts to resolve your case in court.

3. Limiting Your Inquiries to Disputes

According to Randy Padawer, a consumer education specialist for Credit.com partner Lexington Law, too many people start disputing items too early on in the process when they should be considering verifications as well.

“Both Equifax and TransUnion allow consumers to request general item verification without going through the formal dispute process,” Padawer said. Item verification requests a creditor or credit bureau to make sure that the information about an account on your credit report is fair, accurate and fully substantiated. “Most of the cases we handle for clients begin with requests for item verification,” Padawer said.

4. Disputing Before Applying for a Loan

Under the FCRA, the credit bureau has 30 days (occasionally 45 days) to respond to your claim. While an item is in dispute, depending on the scoring model, some aspects of the account are not taken into effect when calculating your credit score, so you may not be benefiting from all the information contained in your credit report.

If you are applying for a mortgage, any notations of “account disputed by consumer” on your credit report may hold up the loan process. With both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (FNMA and FHLMC) automated underwriting processes, a loan application will be kicked out of the system and have to undergo a manual underwriting process, or wait until your credit report has no disputes on it.

5. You Don’t Include Enough Information

When disputing something on your credit report, you are allowed (and encouraged) to provide supporting documentation.

“The system used to facilitate the dispute resolution process can accept attachments, so whatever you send to the credit bureaus is then passed on to the furnishing party so they can consider it in their investigation,” Ulzheimer said.

Having documentation can help support your dispute case, helping demonstrate the problem and proving it is in fact an error. It’s important to remember, however, that even if you do provide supporting information, the explanation may not be robust enough to impact the dispute process.

6. Not Knowing the Right Reason to Dispute

There are so many reasons you can give for a credit dispute, but some require specific clarification. A couple examples of dispute reasons that are often too vague or phrased incorrectly are:

  • The debt is paid so it should be off my credit report. Paying off a debt does not remove it from your credit report right away. Without an intervention, negative information can stay on your reports for seven years. Closed accounts in good standing typically stay on your reports for 10 years.
  • The debt is not mine because my ex-spouse is responsible for it per the divorceBanks and other financial institutions will not automatically remove joint accounts which have been determined to be the responsibility of an ex-spouse via a divorce decree. However, sending in a copy of the decree and requesting that the account be eliminated from a credit report can result in the removal.

Times when a dispute is likely the right way to go include:

  • The account is not yours (whether it’s appearing because of a clerical error, identity theft or something else).
  • The account was not late.
  • The balance is incorrect.
  • The account should be listed as closed or open, but isn’t.
  • The account should have “aged off.”
  • The date of a delinquency is wrong.

As you monitor the results of your dispute, you can see how your credit scores are affected by checking out two of them, updated every 14 days, for free on Credit.com.

Image: Ridofranz

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team