Home > Personal Finance > Stressed About Saving for Retirement? You’re Not Alone

Comments 0 Comments

A recent survey found 56% of Americans are losing sleep over saving for retirement. Another shows having enough money to retire comfortably is the most common financial stressor among 401K participants, regardless of age. In short: Americans are freaking out about retirement.

That makes a lot of sense, considering that report after report has shown that we’re a nation of people who are terrible at saving money. And, as those retirement surveys suggest, we’re painfully aware of it.

Unfortunately, those most concerned about having enough money to comfortably retire are the ones who seem most likely to do it: 61% of active savers say they lose sleep over retirement, while just 49% of non-savers say the same. These figures come from a survey of 1,016 U.S. adults conducted between Feb. 26 and March 1 this year. The nationally representative poll was commissioned by Ramsey Solutions, and the margin of error is plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.

Why would people saving money be more stressed than those who aren’t? Perhaps the non-savers are in a bit of denial, even though socking away cash isn’t a solution to financial-planning concerns. You have to have confidence in what you’re doing with that money, after all.

“Most people assume saving more will eliminate money stress,” Chris Hogan, a financial expert with Ramsey Solutions, said in a press release on the survey. “But it’s not just about saving money. It’s about having a plan, understanding how much they need to save and feeling in control of their future.”

Of course, planning for retirement can be tricky. (If it weren’t, people would likely be better at it.) Only 43% of people with 401Ks said they know how much they need to save to retire comfortably. That’s right — less than half the people saving by way of a 401K actually know what they’re doing (or at least think they do). That doesn’t bode well for those who aren’t saving.

The nationwide survey of 401K savers was conducted online between June 2 and June 8. The data is based on responses from 1,000 participants of Schwab Retirement Plan Services, who worked for companies with at least 25 employees, were currently contributing to their 401K plans and ages 25 to 70. The margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.

Not only are people pretty stressed out about saving for retirement and uncertain of how much they should save, they feel this way regardless of how close they are to retiring. While millennials have the most time to save, 38% of those surveyed said retirement was a significant financial stressor. Compare that to the 29% who said monthly expenses stressed them out, 26% who said the same of credit card debt and 24% who said that of student loans. (There could be other factors at work here, considering the sample doesn’t represent millennials as a whole but only those with 401Ks. Perhaps millennials actively saving for retirement have less credit card or student loan debt to contend with.)

Retirement can hang like a dark cloud over some people, rather than taking on a light-at-the-end-of-the-tunnel role for American workers. That’s not too surprising given the uncertainties of dealing with the future: How long will you work? How long will you live? Is your savings goal really enough to live on a few decades from now?

Answering those questions isn’t easy, but there are a lot of resources out there to help you figure it out. If you’re not sure how retirement planning works, this introduction to retirement lingo can help you get started.

Image: KatarzynaBialasiewicz

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team