Home > Personal Loans > A New Credit Bureau Is Opening & It’s All About Payday Loans

Comments 5 Comments

As federal regulators continue efforts to rein in the payday loan industry, one surprising byproduct will likely be the creation of a new kind of credit bureau.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has proposed new rules dealing with short-term, high-interest loans like title and payday loans. These mainly focus on preventing consumers from getting trapped in a cycle of repeat borrowing. But perhaps the most ambitious part of the plan is the requirement that lenders report loan payment results to… to what?

Traditionally, the nation’s large credit bureaus haven’t taken data on payday loans, title loans, and other similar short-term products. That means borrowers who pay them back on a timely basis don’t get the credit they deserve; and it makes it harder for them to “graduate” to more traditional loan products.

So the CFPB has called for creation of a new kind of credit reporting agency – and given them the decidedly un-sexy moniker, “Registered Information System.” But to borrowers trying to show they are worthy of credit, an RIS might sound just right.

Credit Can Be Hard to Come By

“Every time a consumer pays off a loan of any kind, their opportunity grows,” said Greg Rable, CEO of a firm named FactorTrust.  His company already collects and sells data on short-term loan borrowers, and it hopes to be one of the main Registered Information Service players when the CFPB rule is finalized. “Inclusion of alternative credit data is critical to both parties. We’ve seen people improve their credit scores – at every scoring level — by having alternative credit data available in the underwriting process. More data is better for both the consumer and the lender.”

The CFPB proposed its new short-term lending rules this spring, and what’s expected to be a cantankerous public comment period ends in October. After that, a final rule will be published perhaps a year later. The rules are likely to require that lenders examine borrowers’ “ability to repay” the loans, perhaps by forcing lenders to know more about their consumers’ debt and income status. A Registered Information Service, like a credit bureau, could be the source of such data to lenders. In turn, an RIS would also give borrowers a chance to build up a history of making good on debts. On the other hand, it might also make life harder for consumers who have failed to pay back loans in a timely way. And it creates another data stream for consumers to worry about.

A Wider Net

Efforts have been underway for years to expand the number of consumers who have credit scores and credit reports, so they can participate in the credit economy. Last year, the CFPB found that one out of 10 U.S. adults is “invisible” to the credit industry because of either non-existent or “thin” credit files.

Many would benefit from inclusion of a wider set of criteria in setting credit scores, the industry has argued. For example, in 2015, Experian released a study showing that inclusion of non-traditional credit items like utility payments would lift millions of consumers out of subprime status. It also found that including rent payment history would lift 20% of consumers out of subprime status.

Whether the RISs would help people build traditional credit remains to be seen — and could be a long-time coming, given all the parties, including the major credit scoring models and main bureaus, that would have to get on board. But their reports could make it easier for credit-challenged consumers to get a better rate on a payday loan. (To see where your traditional credit currently stands, you can view two of your credit scores for free each month on Credit.com.)

The Difficulties With Data Collection

Collecting payment data from short-term lenders is a big task. For starters, the industry moves fast.  Borrowers often have as little as two weeks to repay loans, so performance data must be compiled quickly – close to real-time, Rable said. Traditionally, credit bureaus receive monthly updates from data “furnishers” like lenders, but that would be too slow for a payday lender who might be considering a loan to a consumer who took out another one just days earlier.

Rable said he’s also worried that small lenders who don’t have systems in place will suddenly be faced with complex reporting requirements; they might have to send data to 5 or even 10 different outlets, he said.

“For a lot of these guys, this will be a brand new thing,” he said.  “For big banks, they report to one or two big credit bureaus.  …Our view is the fewer the better on the RIS side to deal with the complexity.”

Consumers will face complexity, too. Each RIS will have to develop a dispute process, for example. It’s possible consumers might have to complain about errors to each system individually – once they even discover the existence of an RIS that’s holding negative information on them. Already, disputes are a big source of headaches in the traditional credit bureaus.

While Gable favors use of more data in the short-term lending industry, he said the verdict is out on how the new CFPB rules might impact both lenders and borrowers.

“It’s yet to be determined if this is good for consumers and the industry,” he said. “Initially, it’s going to be a very big challenge for the industry.”

Image: sturti

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • EdInBoca

    This is a bad idea for several reasons including:

    1. Many states already have safeguards in place. If you have an open payday loan, you cannot get another one until you pay it off. In this case, a “credit bureau” is unnecessary.
    2. This could have an adverse effect on obtaining other forms of credit. Creditors may view having a payday loan as a negative and deny you other forms of credit simply because they have a stigma for payday loans.
    3. A payday loan is NOT credit! It is a loan that is usually backed by a check from your checking account. When the loan comes due on your payday, you can either pay it in cash or they will submit your personal check for the payback. There is no “credit” involved.
    This sounds like another sneaky way for third parties to access your personal information. Also, banks need to stop whining about payday lenders when you won’t lift a finger to help people who use payday lenders. You just don’t want anybody lending any money except the bank. Baloney!
    BTW…I am not a payday lender nor am I associated with any payday lenders.

    • rose jesseph

      bad bad idea..I am so not for it……# 2 is so correct..more bad i nfo on your credit report.. just leave things alone

    • Leroy Smith

      While some of your points are valid, the third one is completely false in this day and age. Google payday loan no checking account and you will get back a lot of results showing it’s not accurate. Also a loan with collateral, which is what the check is when required, is still credit.
      This system is a predatory one with very little regulation and oversight right now.
      The second point you made is the one I wish they would have addressed more.

    • Jacque

      Really? My credit union offers payday loans, and has done so since voters limited payday loan interest via a ballot initiative. I don’t think you realize how much it really does vary by state, and no most states don’t have any payday loan regulations.

  • 3monkeys

    They need to regulate the credit reporting agencies and collections agencies. Re-aging medical debt so it stays for 10 years on your credit report is ridiculous. And how about starting to get the benefits on your credit report for paying rent on time as well as your car insurance, health insurance and other monthly payments you make.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team