Home > Identity Theft > Gone Phishing? How to Talk to Your Kids About Malware

Comments 0 Comments

Picture this: The car is full. You’re navigating by the side mirrors while doing a mental inventory of everything you packed and wondering if you are going to make it to the realtor’s office in time to pick up the keys for your vacation rental. You have absolutely no idea what the kids are doing in the back seat.

Now forget the massive distraction of that summer road trip and consider the bigger picture. It doesn’t matter how old or worldly they are, or how ridiculously up in their business you are. You can’t know what your kids are doing every second of the day. And just like a good cops and robbers game, better surveillance only creates better criminals — which means all the more careful your child will need to be when your eyes aren’t directly on them.

While most of us have learned over the past few years to ignore the lures and snares of malware propagation — whether they come via app, Facebook post, email or text — no one is perfect, and kids may not understand the big picture well enough to avoid the hazards without some guidance.

The big picture is simple: There are criminals out there — more than you can imagine — whose day job it is to get enough of your personally identifiable information to steal goods and services in your name or crawl into your bank account and drain it; in other words, to commit identity-related fraud.

Your first job is to get this across to the children in your life: Criminals can use their information — personal details like birthdays, addresses, family names — to steal things — and those criminals do this by tricking kids into providing that information.

Yes, You Really Need to Have That Talk

Remember the toddler years when things went missing — car keys, credit cards, stock certificates, crown jewels — only to resurface during a weekend excavation of their play space or in the back of a sock drawer? Teens and tweens aren’t much better. They lose house keys and car keys too; they forget where they parked the car, smartphones disappear, and so on and so forth.

The bottom line here is that kids are strangers to two key concepts that help put a layer of protection between you and online scams aimed at separating you from your personally identifiable information.

While it’s true that focus and impulse control aren’t exactly something adults just magically acquire with age, when it comes to younger people, it’s an oxymoron. This is something that needs to be discussed, notwithstanding all the eye-rolls and sighs. That lack of impulse control is what makes phishing and other malware scams work.

Phishing attacks succeed or fail depending on a number of factors, but the main one is the target’s distraction level. Kids are not always the most mindful among us. This makes them targets for phishing scams.

Forget the Helicopter Routine

The very best advice I can give you here is to set strong “Do Not Cross” lines for them from the very start. Use examples of things that have gone missing, or days that have been horrible because of distraction, to start the conversation.

Tell them that real-life risk includes things digital, especially with regard to their personally identifying information. Have a basic rule: If you are asked for personal information, check with a parent. Explain some common tactics used by phishing scams. For example, popular websites and services require updating, authorization or validating an account. It’s a real thing, but scam artists use it to get personal information. All such requests should raise their level of concern.

Set a basic rule here: Only adults can provide payment information, or troubleshoot an account that has asked for information.

Tell them to watch out for websites that are almost right: If you follow a link that was sent via email or text or that was posted on a social network and something looks a little wrong, leave that site immediately.

Phishing scams often create sites that look like the real thing, but there are little differences here and there. That said, sometimes the only way to detect the fraud is by looking at the URL. The many scam sites will spell it a little differently, but just barely so.

Today’s kids know more than their parents about a dumbfounding array of topics that would make the most hardened politician blush. But unfortunately they may be even more vulnerable to phishing attacks, and it’s your job to keep them out of the shark tank.

Image: harleebob

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team