Home > Managing Debt > A Debt Collector Came After Me for $4,526 That I Didn’t Owe

Comments 0 Comments

She was accused of check fraud, and theft by deception. She was told that she owed $4,526, and was facing daily late fees. She was warned that her wages could be garnished or her property could be seized. The menacing phone calls and emails began in April and starting piling up quickly.

But Susan Marquardt, of Chicago, had never heard of the company calling and writing her: Advance Cash Services.

“It was horrible,” Marquardt, 51, said. “They just kept calling and leaving really harassing messages.”

Fortunately, the internet had heard of them. Marquardt did a quick search and found mountains of complaints about the firm allegedly harassing consumers over debts they say they don’t owe. My own search found complaints dating back several years. For example, Washington state officials first warned consumers about ACS in 2011, but renewed its warning late last year.

Phantom Debt Collection

The tactic is sometimes called “phantom debt collection” and it continues because it works. Consumers, intimidated or scared by the threat of legal action, pay up. In Marquardt’s case, she was told she could avoid legal trouble if she paid $700 immediately. According to a complaint she filed with the Illinois Attorney General’s office, she was threatened with seizure and sale of “movable” assets and wage garnishment.

“Phantom debt collection is one of the most egregious scams I’ve seen in years,” Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan said. “Simply entering your personal information on a payday loan site can easily come back to haunt you. There is no way of knowing where this information will end up, and unfortunately it’s usually in the hands of scam artists.”

That could be how Marquardt’s trouble began. Earlier this year, she took out a small online payday loan, but paid it back within a few weeks. She’s had nothing but trouble ever since. First, someone used her banking details to write fraudulent checks. Then, the phone started ringing off the hook with this fake debt incident.

What Happened Next

Attempts to get a comment from ACS for this story were unsuccessful, but reporting on it did land me my own menacing debt collection note.

When I called the number listed for ACS at the Better Business Bureau in West Florida — where ACS has been hit with more than 1,600 complaints — a man who answered the phone said he did not wish to comment. (I was unable to confirm that the man was connected to ACS, or that the phone number was correct). An email sent to what appeared to be ACS’s main office was returned as undeliverable.

But an email sent to the address that contacted Marquardt yielded a surprising “comment” for the story.

“This is (Advance Cash Services), it is a parent company which owns and operates more than 350 parental payday loan websites,” it read. “You applied from one of our website and you never bothered to pay this debt, so the creditor wants to know your intention about this matter of yours that what would you like to do. And now with the late fees and tax, Rate of Interest the initial amount goes up to $935.76.”

I was asked to provide a date when I would pay the amount.

“We are talking about the loan amount that you took with the company ACS -Advance Cash Services (A Parental Pay Day Advance Company), using an e-mail address (Bob@XXX.net) and your SSN. The money was successfully deposited into your bank account. Kindly provide us the date on which you can come up with $935.76 so that we can send you the Settlement Agreement which you need to fill, sign and send us back in order to freeze down your case.”

The letter went on to warn me that if the case file was “downloaded…we won’t be able to help you out.”

Why Phantom Debt Collection Works

To be clear, I have not applied for a payday loan recently, or ever. But consumers who have done so likely are facing at least some financial trouble, so they make good targets for intimidation. Also, it’s fairly easy to create doubt in a consumer’s mind. Marquart keeps good financial records, but still there was a part of her that might have fallen for the scam.

“I knew I had paid [the payday loan] off, but 5% of me thought, ‘Well maybe…'” she said. “Two years ago I got a divorce and I thought, maybe it’s my ex, but it wasn’t.”

That’s why phantom debt scam calls work; if they can create just a little doubt in a consumer’s mind, criminals have a chance to exploit that weakness and make a killing.

“I was kind of mad. I thought, ‘how dare they!'” she said. “I pay all my bills and whatever and when they come up saying I owe them. That’s why I filled out the complaint.”

And that’s why Marquart agreed to describe her experience to Credit.com.

“If I help just one other person who might fall for this kind of thing, it’s worth it,” she said.

We’ve talked before about the things every consumer should do when they receive a debt collection call – here’s a quick list of seven questions to ask – but asking one question would probably help you sniff out most phantom collectors: “What is your license number?” Most states require collectors to be registered. Attempt to verify the license before doing anything else, and you’ll be more likely to scare off most scammers.

Remember, debt collection accounts can damage your credit. If a fraudulent account appears on your credit reports, be sure to dispute the error with the credit bureau in question. You can check your credit reports for errors by pulling them each year for free at AnnualCreditReport.com and viewing your free credit report summary, updated each month, for free on Credit.com.

Image: Gajus

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team