Home > Personal Finance > 6 Planning Mistakes You Can Avoid If You Have a Special Needs Child

Comments 0 Comments

This is the second of a two-part article about the mistakes that parents of a special needs child often make when they are planning their estates (you can read part one here). Those mistakes can have long-term negative consequences for the child and significantly impact his or her lifestyle once the parents are deceased or become incapacitated and can no longer look out for their special needs son or daughter.

Here are six common mistakes I see as an estate-planning attorney and how you can avoid them.

6. Not Properly ‘Funding’ & Maintaining the Plan

When planning for a child with special needs, it is absolutely critical that sufficient assets be available for that person throughout his or her lifetime. In many instances, this requires the use of a liquid asset, like permanent life insurance. Life insurance can be the perfect vehicle for this purpose, particularly if the parents of the child with special needs are young and healthy when they purchase the policy, which means that it won’t cost a lot.

The parents can name as beneficiary of the policy the special needs trust, which could be set up either through their will or in their revocable living trust. Knowing that the policy will secure the financial future of their special needs child, mom and dad can feel comfortable leaving the rest of their estate to their other children.

If the parents’ estate is large enough that estate taxes is a concern — for 2016, this means that a married couple’s estate is worth more than $10,900,000 (single parents need to worry about estate taxes if their estate is worth more than $5,450,000), they should consider having an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust, or ILIT, own the policy. This trust should have the special needs provisions inside of it, and should also be the policy beneficiary. Parents who want to set up an ILIT should hire an experienced estate planning attorney — it’s a complex legal matter.

7. Choosing the Wrong Trustee

Special needs trusts are very complex, so when parents set one up it’s generally a bad idea to designate a family member or close friend as its trustee. After all, most family members and friends are not experts on this kind of trust, so if they are serving as its trustee, they are at risk of making costly mistakes. For example, the family member or friend trustee might make mistakes when distributing money from the trust on behalf of a special needs child and as a result, they might disqualify him or her from being able to receive important government benefits.

It can be best to hire a professional trustee (a bank or trust company) who understands the myriad, sometimes confusing, and frequently changing rules that apply to special needs trusts. And of course, it’s crucial that whoever is chosen as trustee understands the parents’ objectives, is qualified to invest the trust assets in a manner that is most likely to meet them, and is ethical.

8. Failing to Invite Contributions from Others to the Trust

A key benefit of creating a special needs trust is that the beneficiary’s extended family and friends can make gifts to it while they are alive or at their deaths. For example, they can name the special needs trust as the beneficiary of the assets in their revocable living trust or will, and/or they can name the special needs trust as the beneficiary of their life insurance policy or retirement benefits.

9. Relying on Siblings to Use Their Own Money to Care for a Special Needs Brother or Sister

Some parents assume that their other children will use their own assets or inheritances to provide for their special needs sibling. Although this may be a successful temporary strategy, assuming those other children are financially secure and have money to spare, it’s a risky one long term. For example, one or more of those children may develop financial problems and no longer be able to help support their special needs sibling, or they may decide that their priorities have changed and so they want to use their financial resources in some other way. Or, maybe the sibling(s) who has been providing the support dies or becomes incapacitated while the special needs sibling is still alive.

Also, when parents rely on their other children to pay for the needs of their special needs sibling, they have no assurance that those children will care for that child as thoughtfully and completely as they did while they were alive.

Finally, it’s not unusual for the siblings of a child with special needs to feel a great sense of responsibility for their brother or sister. Sometimes this can feel like a big emotional burden and even cause them to resent their special needs sibling. Therefore, it’s always best if parents assume responsibility for the future care, housing and well-being of their special needs child through their estate plan and not assume that their other children will take care of it.

10. Creating a Special Needs Trust in a Will Rather Than Using a Revocable Living Trust

Wills as well as trusts established through a will, including special needs trusts, are part of the public record, which means that anyone can find out their details. Furthermore, it’s increasingly common for wills to be posted on the internet, which puts vulnerable beneficiaries, such as someone with special needs at greater risk for being harmed by financial predators. For example, adults with special needs are often targets because they tend to be more trusting, “want to fit in” with their peers and may not be able to distinguish between someone who is looking out for them and someone who wants to take advantage of them.

In contrast, the provisions of a special needs trust that is established outside a will, in a revocable living trust, can remain totally private. In other words, no one other than the people who need to know the trust details can have access to them.

11. Not Keeping the Estate Plan Up to Date

Estate planning rules and regulations change constantly. Therefore, it’s risky business to assume that an estate plan developed to provide for the needs of a special needs child will continue to meet that goal over time. Therefore, it’s essential that the parents of a special needs child revisit their estate plan frequently with the help of their estate planning attorney and that they make all necessary changes. It’s the only way that parents can ensure that their goals and objectives will be met.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its partners.

 

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: jarenwicklund

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team