Home > Mortgages > 10 Home Upgrades With the Best Return on Your Money

Comments 1 Comment

Insulation is about as sexy as flannel pajamas, but guess what? The money spent on beefing up attic insulation delivers the best bang per buck invested in home upgrades, according to Remodeling Magazine’s 2016 Cost vs. Value report.

In fact, adding insulation (and nine other practical projects) outscored more glamorous upgrades, like kitchen and bathroom remodels.

To conduct the report, now in its 29th year, the magazine researched costs in 100 real estate markets around the country for 30 popular home projects. It asked a panel of real estate professionals to evaluate the rate of return on each of these projects in their local area.

One caveat: Earning a decent return isn’t the same as making a profit. On average, money spent on the 30 projects earned a 64% return. In most cities, the best projects only came close to breaking even. The one exception this year was beefing up attic insulation, which had a good return on investment in most markets — with an average of almost 117%.

Also worth noting: Projects recoup their cost better in high-demand real estate markets, like San Francisco, than in less-competitive markets.

These are the 10 projects that the study reported earn the biggest payback for homeowners.

1. Attic Insulation: 116.9%

Of the 30 jobs Remodeling Magazine examined, the simple task of blowing loose fiberglass insulation into a 35-by-30-foot attic pays back the best. On average, around the country, insulating the attic to an R-30 value cost $1,268. It added an average of $1,482 to the home’s value — a 116.9% rate of return. The attic insulation job makes money for homeowners in 59 of the 100 markets studied.

How much insulation you’d need at your home depends on your climate and the building energy code where you live. (This U.S. Department of Energy map shows residential and commercial energy codes used in each state.)

2. Manufactured Stone Veneer: 92.9%

Adding manufactured stone to a home’s exterior adds a look that many buyers like and are willing to pay more for. The project considered in the study involved removing 300 square feet of vinyl siding around the bottom of a home and replacing it with manufactured stone veneer at an average cost of $7,519. The “stone” is made of molded concrete that’s shaped and treated to resemble natural rock. The estimated payback: $6,988 added to the home’s value.

3. Garage Door Replacement: 91.5%

An investment of $1,652, on average, produces a return of $1,512 for homeowners who spiff up their garage with a new, uninsulated four-section steel door that reuses the existing motorized opener and adds new galvanized steel tracks. Spend a bit more and you can get almost as good a return. A more-expensive garage door replacement cost $3,140, on average, and recouped $2,830 — a 90.1% return.

4. Steel Entry Door: 91.1%

Replacing a home’s front door with a fresh one of 20-gauge steel has been a reliable winner in Remodeling Magazine studies over the years. An investment of $1,335, on average, produces a return of $1,217. For the price you get a door that is painted at the factory on both sides and includes a dual-pane window and a new bored-lock in brass or antique-brass.

5. Minor Kitchen Remodel: 83.1%

Spending $20,122 to update a 200-square-foot kitchen with new cabinet and drawer fronts and hardware, new wall oven, cooktop, sink, faucet and laminate countertops adds $16,716, on average, to a home’s value.

But take the project upscale for an upscale major kitchen remodel and the payback changes. Spend $119,909 on a “major” kitchen remodel — including top-of-the-line cherry cabinets, stone counters, cork floors, new lighting, ceramic or glass backsplash, built-in wall oven, cooktop, refrigerator, warming oven, trash compactor, commercial range and vent hood — and you’ll recoup just 61.5% of the investment ($73,707), the study finds. A major kitchen remodel done with midrange products (an average cost of $59,999) pays off better: 64.9%.

6. Fiberglass Entry Door: 82.3%

Invest an average of $3,126 on a new entry door made of fiberglass in a simulated wood grain, stained front and back with a decorative window. The price includes PVC-clad trim and a new mortise lock with lever handle and integrated deadbolt with an oil-rubbed bronze or satin-nickel finish. The payback: $2,574, on average.

7. Siding Replacement: 77%

Upgrading a home’s siding is an expensive project — the study envisions spending an average of $14,100 — but it improves a home’s value by $10,857, on average. This price tag, however, averages in not only different costs across 100 markets but also a great variety of siding products, from vinyl and foam-backed vinyl, to fiber cement and engineered siding. That means your costs and your results could vary widely based on location and products used.

8. Wood Deck Addition: 75%

The project envisioned includes a 16-by-20-foot deck of pressure-treated wood planks and joists, three steps and a built-in bench and planter and railings — all of the same material. The cost: $10,471 and the return: $7,850.

Composite decking is the newer alternative. The best composite products are low-maintenance and offer a longer lifespan. But a nearly identical project done with composite planking costs $37,943, on average — almost four times the price of wood — and it recoups just 57.7% of the cost ($21,877) when selling a home.

9. New Vinyl Windows: 72.1% — 73.3%

Vinyl windows beat wood windows when it comes to recouping cost, but not by much.

The cost of replacing 10 windows (leaving the trim in place) runs $14,725, on average. Envisioned for the project are 3-by-5-foot double-hung insulated, low-E vinyl windows with a simulated wood finish on the inside. You’d recoup $10,794 (73.3%), on average, if the home gets sold within a year.

Wood windows are costlier: The same project costs an average of $18,087, but you’d recoup about $13,050, or 72.1%.

10. New Roof: 71.7%

There’s nothing cheap about replacing a roof, but maybe that’s why buyers pay a premium for a home with a new one already in place (and why this may be a good negotiating tool). At least they know the project is out of the way for a long while.

The average cost for a new roof in the study was $20,142. This replacement was for a roof of 30 new squares of 235-pound fiberglass asphalt shingles. The cost also included installation, removing the old roofing material, disposing of the waste and new felt underlayment, drip edge and flashing. Gutters were not included. This project is expected to recoup $14,446, on average, when the house sells. That’s a great deal on a new roof for a home buyer.

What About the Fun Stuff?

You probably have the idea by now: Money spent on practical, no-frills upgrades offers the best financial return. But if you’re still wondering about how well money spent on lifestyle-type projects pays back, here are a few examples.

  • Basement Remodel: 70.4%
  • Two-Story Addition: 69.3%
  • Family Room Addition: 67.9%
  • Midrange Bathroom Remodel: 65.7%
  • Master Suite Addition: 64.1%
  • Upscale Bathroom Remodel: 57.5%
  • Bathroom Addition: 56.7% — 56.2%

What’s Trending & Where

If you’re thinking of putting money into remodeling, here are some of the other takeaways from the study that may help you decide on the best project for you.

  • Curb Appeal: Many of the projects with the most return were improvements to a home’s exterior. That, the magazine’s editors speculate, may be because they improve what the real estate industry calls “curb appeal,” or the impression the home makes on buyers and passers-by. Work done on windows and siding, for example, paid off better than money invested in work on kitchens and bathrooms.
  • Replacements: Replacement projects – like doors, windows and siding — returned slightly more (61.5%) than remodeling projects (57.3%).
  • Project on the Upswing: The project with the greatest financial gain in the last year was a minor kitchen remodel, which delivered 83.1% this year compared to the 79.3% return reported in 2015.
  • Where Remodeling Pays: The projects studied delivered different returns in different markets. In just one city, San Francisco, every one of the jobs returned more than 100% of the investment. Housing shortages seem to drive up return, the magazine says. In 18 cities where the renovations performed best (at least 75% of the money invested returned), half were in California or Florida.
  • Payback Varies by Region: Payback was highest — 77.5% — in the Pacific region, which includes high-priced real estate in California and Hawaii, as well as Oregon, Washington and Alaska. Payback was lowest — 54.9% — in the East South Central region, in states that include Alabama, Kentucky, Mississippi and Tennessee.

[Editor’s Note: If you are considering making any upgrades to your home, whether for resale value or just because, it’s a good idea to avoid spending more than you can afford on a project. You can see how your home upgrade project fits into your financial goals, like building good credit scores, by using this free tool on Credit.com.] 

More From Money Talks News:

Image: Susan Chiang

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Tony

    If the goal is to increase one’s net worth, I can’t understand why one would spend X amount of dollars on home improvement when one could only expect to recoup a percentage of that when the home is sold. Wouldn’t one be farther ahead if one simply did not make the improvement.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team