Home > Auto Loans > Poor? You’re Going to Pay More for Car Insurance, Research Finds

Comments 0 Comments

Lower-income individuals may be paying more for car insurance, according to recent research by the Consumer Federation of America (CFA).

“Insurance companies are penalizing good drivers by hundreds and sometimes thousands of dollars each year based on economic and social status, and the end result is that the poor pay more, much more,” J. Robert Hunter, CFA’s director of insurance, said in a press release.

According to the study, those who have a higher economic status pay an average of $1,144 for car insurance each year, while premiums increased about 59% (to $1,825 each year) for those with a lower economic status.

Methodology

The study looked at the five factors most insurance providers use to give an insurance quote that can help determine economic status: education level, occupation, marital status, homeownership status and whether they have owned a car for the past six months.

From there, the CFA used the online portals for the five largest auto insurers in the nation — Allstate, Farmer’s, GEICO, Progressive, and State Farm — to get quotes for a typically-mandatory basic liability car insurance policy in 15 major U.S. cities.

The research team established four different hypothetical personas used to apply for these policies: two men and two women who had opposing socio-economic characteristics, but were the same age, drove the same car, lived at the same address and had the same good driving record.

For example, “Female A” is a bank executive with a master’s degree, owns a home, is married, and has had car insurance coverage with the same provider for three years. Her counterpart, “Female B,” is a bank teller with a high school degree, is a renter, hasn’t had a car for the past six months (so no auto insurance), and is single.

According to the CFA study, two drivers with the same driving record and living at the same house paid two different premiums — the one who had a characteristic of a lower economic status paid higher premiums 92% of the time.

Breaking it Down by Provider & Location

The study found that four of the nation’s largest five auto insurers often charged 40% to 92% more (about $600 to $900 annually) to drivers because of their lower economic status, despite having perfect driving records.

Allstate and Farmer’s Insurance were found to charge the largest increases due to lower economic status drivers, CFA said, with increases of $915 and $900 respectively. Neither of these providers immediately responded to Credit.com’s request for comment about the study.

State Farm was found to have the smallest increase in rates for lower economic status drivers at $217 more each year, CFA said.

A spokesperson from GEICO said the company tries to offer low rates to all consumers and that “GEICO bases its prices on actuarially-justified costs.”

Progressive and State Farm also did not immediately respond to request for comment on the study.

“[The CFA] look[ed] at only five companies, instead of the entire insurance marketplace, which is almost 300 companies,” James Lynch, chief actuary of Insurance Information Institute, said. “It’s very difficult to say those are representatives of the entire insurance marketplace.”

Drivers in Queens, New York; Jersey City, New Jersey; Boston, Atlanta, Minneapolis, Houston and Jacksonville, Florida, saw the highest added expenses, with lower economic status drivers paying an average of more than $700 more each year, the study said.

Los Angeles reported the smallest difference in policy fees between lower-income and higher-income applicants, at $80 per year. This is due to California’s consumer protection laws, which prohibits providers from asking all of the non-driving related questions used in this report, except for marital status.

Applying for Car Insurance

During a tele-press conference on Monday morning, Hunter and Doug Heller, the co-authors of the study, acknowledged that their study did not factor in how a customer’s credit score would alter a premium. When filling out the application for the premium, they did not provide a Social Security number, so the credit scoring was left at a default setting for all policies.

Heller said he felt that if they had factored in credit scores, “it would have made [the discrepancies] a lot worse.”

Before you shop around for car insurance, it’s a good idea to find out where your credit stands. (You can take a look at two of your credit scores for free, updated each month, on Credit.com.) If you discover your scores aren’t up to snuff, you may be able to repair your credit by doing things like paying down high credit card balances and disputing any errors you discover on your reports.

More on Auto Loans:

Image: andresr

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team