Home > Identity Theft > Could Campaign Contributions Expose You to ID Theft?

Comments 0 Comments

Over the past few years, we’ve experienced more ginormous data breaches than any of us can, or would even care to, remember. Against this backdrop, reflect upon the fact that political campaigns know as much, if not more, than advertisers about us — what inspires us and what will move us to vote.

The Wild West

Consider the various kinds of information a campaign crunches to determine who might be persuaded into voting for their candidate and the parallel to advertising and marketing becomes instantly clear.

Many campaigns don’t “only” (and I use the term advisedly) collect things like your name, email address, postal address, phone number, mobile number, credit card information, location, what you’re called on social media sites (your handles) and other contact or identifying information you choose to provide when you go to make a donation or sign up for their emails. There’s also often a cornucopia of data collected when you use a campaign’s site — cookies, your IP address and other digital no-see-ums. While that information would be horrible to leak, it’s nothing compared to the granular details that campaigns purchase from data mining companies.

“This is the Wild West,” Tim Sparapani, a data privacy consultant and former director of public policy for Facebook, recently told the Los Angeles Times, “There is nothing that is off-limits to political data mining.”

They Have WHAT?

This is not just about social media, but it definitely starts there. Data mining companies have long scoured social media to glean information about potential customers, proponents, fans, outraged citizens and any other manifestation of subjective choice “out there.”

There are too many instances to bring up here, but a report in Bloomberg late last year can serve as a general example. It was about a data mining firm that was working for former presidential candidate John Kasich’s Super PAC to create “a ‘social graph’ of possible supporters by scanning high school yearbooks, small-town newspapers, and sports-team rosters.”

If a yearbook is OK in the land of deep dives, what other records could be put to use? Like rose petals in the wind, data is scattered about everywhere, and there is no place too insignificant for a data mining company to potentially send employees to scour for useable bits.

What’s the Big Deal?

What may not be as obvious is that the type of information they collect is often of significant value to hackers and their clientele. Hackers, advertising executives and political operatives constantly search for ways to move a person to take a particular action. With hackers, the action is to click a link that downloads account or sensitive personal information-grabbing malware or otherwise provides access to money or services using your information. Politicians simply want your vote.

Concern that hackers will compromise political campaign databases seems like a prudent response to the current information security landscape, yet disappointingly, at least for those of us in the data security community, the conversation between candidates about security has been largely focused on the “Great Wall of Mexico” and whether or not ISIS should be nuked.

Were a major campaign hack to go down, it would not only create a very unfortunate political situation, but also the information of millions of voters would be at risk for phishing attacks and identity theft. If one of these data-heavy campaign databases were to fall into the wrong hands, there is no end to the scams that creative, sophisticated and persistent fraudsters could pull off with it, or the havoc they might wreak.

The attacks could be based on a familiarity with the target and/or target group—phishing, spearphishing, picking purchases that go unnoticed, cooking up scams involving known networks of friends gleaned from voter data married to social networking accounts — but I digress.

The Solution

As things stand, there is no solution. Data breaches are the third certainty in life, right behind death and taxing presidential elections.

To be completely honest (isn’t that a refreshing concept in a presidential election?) in order to be almost cyber bulletproof, you would have to live in a log cabin on Loon Lake and never associate with anyone or anything. That said, there is a point in the drive to be careful with your information where you have to also live life.

Bottom line: As I mention in my book “Swiped: How To Protect Yourself In a World Filled With Scammers, Phishers and Identity Thieves” – practice the 3Ms: Do everything you can to minimize your risk of exposure, monitor aggressively so that you know as quickly as possible if you have a problem and have a plan to manage the damage. (You can check for signs of identity theft by viewing your free credit report summary each month on Credit.com.)

Don’t assume that your candidate of choice, no matter how much you think you can trust him or her, actually has your back. Frankly, in this decidedly insecure digital world, they don’t even have their own.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its partners.

More on Identity Theft:

Image: EdStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team