Home > 2016 > Personal Finance

How We Went to a Cubs Game for Less Than $100

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

You’d think America’s favorite pastime would be less expensive, but baseball games are one pricey outing. The tickets are just the beginning. Factor in transportation and the obligatory peanuts and beverage of choice, and going to a major league baseball game can easily cost two people more than $100.

Recently, my husband and I went to one of the priciest ballparks in the country: Wrigley Field. The average cost for two to see the Chicago Cubs at the Friendly Confines is $116.06, according to an analysis of 2016 MLB prices from GOBankingRates. That includes tickets, parking, food and drinks. The only team more expensive to see at home is the Boston Red Sox at Fenway Park, where two people pay $157 on average.

But to prove it doesn’t have to be so expensive, we set out to spend less than $100 at a Cubs game in late April (and not deprive ourselves of any fun). Here’s how we did it.

1. Go for the Cheap Seats

When you go to a game, you want to be able to see it. But so much of what’s fun about being at a ballpark is the atmosphere, and you can experience that no matter where you’re sitting. We got tickets in the second-cheapest section ($10 each before tax, as opposed to $9), purely because I thought the vantage point would be better for shooting photos.

When you’re looking for cheap tickets, keep in mind it’s not just about seats. We opted for a weeknight game, which was much cheaper than a weekend game during the day. Taxes and fees run pretty high in Chicago, so our tickets ended up costing $18.38 each, for a total of $36.76.
cubs game 003

2. Cut Transport Costs

Unlike a lot of ballparks, there are several ways to get to Wrigley Field. Driving is the most expensive, given that parking can cost $15 to $30 (not including gas), unless you find a free or cheap spot. There are lots of shuttles and park-and-ride options, but unless you live within walking distance, public transport is the cheapest route.

I live in the city, so we took the L (Brown Line to Red Line) from work to the Addison Red Line station, where you walk right into the glorious chaos that is the streets of Wrigleyville on game day. To get home, we took a bus.

L fare costs $2.25 roundtrip per person, and bus fare is $2 each, so we spent $8.50.

3. BYOP (Bring Your Own Peanuts)

If you take the Red Line to Addison, you’ll probably pass Jeff Flores on your way out the station. A Chicago native, Flores has sold game essentials to cost-conscious fans for 17 years. “Bottled water for $1! It’s $4 inside!” he yells. (Flores also sells attire, sports drinks and, on a freezing day in late April, hand warmers, which I should have purchased.)

The water and peanuts cost $8, since someone forgot you’re not allowed to bring open bottles into the ballpark. Still, we saved money, which left us with just less than $50 for the rest of the game.


4. Budget for the Expensive Stuff

If you want a beer and hot food, there’s not much you can do. We didn’t want to skimp on the in-game experience, so we tried to get everything else for as little as possible.

The cheapest beer I saw — and this is upsetting — was $8.25 for a draught Bud Light. I’ve paid more for a Bud Light (cough Yankee Stadium), but the “better” beers weren’t worth it either. We actually paid $9 for our first round of Bud Light.

Trying to find the most affordable option wasn’t easy. Vendors in stands hawked $8.50 Bud Light, but I would have tipped them, which would have cost more. At first, it looked like $9 beer was the best we could do, but right after we bought them, we passed a stand where Bud Light was being sold for $8.25. We later bought two of those but realized the cups were a different size than our $9 cups.

I have no idea if they held the same amount, and as I tried to figure this out, the Cubs pulled ahead in the bottom of the sixth, and I had to watch the biggest play of the game on a screen. Going with the vendors in the stands would have been smarter.

Besides four beers ($34.50), we got some nachos and a soft pretzel. We didn’t buy the cheese cup for the pretzel (who wants to pay $1.50 for cheese?), but the nachos came with plenty extra to make it work. Nachos were $5.50, and the pretzel cost $5.

Grand total: $98.26

When spring and summer roll around, it’s easy to get carried away and end up spending more than you should. But while it may not seem like it in the moment, a fantastic experience doesn’t justify forgoing your financial goals or going into debt, and you don’t need to do either to have a great time. (You can track your financial goals, like building a good credit score, each month on Credit.com.)

Our strategy is just one way of trying to balance fun and frugality. The most important thing for us was to have as much fun as possible without blowing our budget, and we certainly did. (Bonus: The Cubs won.)

More Money-Saving Reads:

Images: Christine DiGangi; Screenshot via Cubs.com

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team