Home > Auto Loans > Lease or Buy: The Definitive Guide for Car Buyers

Comments 0 Comments

Americans love a good rivalry: Yankees versus Red Sox, Coke versus Pepsi, and most of all, leasing versus buying.

Leasing a car is sizzling hot right now. New data show one out of every three new cars is leased. And leasing may very well rule the future, as it shot up 46% over the last five years among millennial new car buyers. To those who think leasing is always a terrible deal, this is a travesty. To leasing fans, it’s vindication.

The topic of car leasing brings out a lot of emotion in drivers. Many people think leasing is non-sensical because after making payments for three years, consumers own nothing. But, in reality, that’s an inaccurate assessment and whether or not you should lease depends — not only on the driver’s needs but on those of the auto industry. Sometimes car makers offer incentives that make leasing attractive. So those who dismiss leasing outright could be missing out.

The truth is, leasing is more expensive than buying most of the time. The average American keeps a new car for six-and-a-half years, but a 2012 survey found Americans intend to keep their cars for up to 10 years. In either case, buying will probably be cheaper than leasing because when you buy a car, the monthly payments will eventually stop. Pay off a car loan, you keep the car; pay off the lease, you just get another. So the longer you intend to keep a car, in general, the better it seems to buy.

Yet even this equation comes with a hitch. My four-year-old Toyota Rav4 needed a new transmission recently. But as a high-mileage driver, I was out of warranty, and worst of all, out of luck. My repair bill was $5,000 (although Toyota kicked in $1,000 when I complained).

The advantage renters have is like the advantage renters have over mortgage holders — no surprise repair bills. As long as drivers stay within mileage limits, whatever happens to the car will generally be covered under warranty. As one reader on my website put it, “I’ve been leasing for about 10 years now. No unpredictable repair shocks to my wallet because I’m always driving a new car.”

Of course, mileage caps are another factor in the lease vs. buy dilemma. Those with long commutes or who like to travel generally shouldn’t lease because leases tend to limit drivers to about 1,000 miles per month. Exceeding the limit is expensive and can cost from 10 to 30 cents per mile. Also, watching your miles every week is a drag. Imagine turning down a road trip because of your mileage cap. This is especially critical, as dealers have been sweetening lease deals lately with even more complex, i.e., lower, mileage caps.

One factor often cited as a reason to buy is equity. It’s usually stated like this: “With buying, you own something of value after you pay off the loan. With leasing, you have nothing at the end.” But that’s just part of the story. Cars are terrible assets; they lose value quickly and in unpredictable ways. In the end, I find most five- or six-year-old cars are worth a few thousand dollars as trade-ins.

Online auto valuation sites may say your car is worth more, but what matters is what you walk away with. Used car sales are so clunky, it’s silly to use those lease vs. buy calculators and feel vindicated you saved $982 on a vehicle you owned for five years. You may have given that value back to the dealer when you received wholesale value instead of street value.

In the end, people want — and need — reliable transportation, so you can see why leasing’s attractive.

When Leasing Can Beat Buying

Less sales tax: You don’t pay sales tax on the full price of the car but on the value of the car used during the lease. (If you buy the car at the end of the lease for its established ‘residual value,’ you’ll pay the rest of the sales tax.)

Tax perks: For some folks, leasing is a much easier tax write-off.

Luxury: You’ll probably be driving around in a nice new car every three years.

It feels cheaper: Monthly and down payments will probably be lower.

No repair surprises: Fear of big repair costs will definitely be lower.

Buy ‘used’ for less: Particularly low-mile drivers may get a bargain at the end of the lease by buying the car at residual value. (Sometimes, but rarely, is this cheaper than buying the car in the first place.)

When Buying Can Beat Leasing 

End-of-lease risks: What happens when the lease ends? “Wear and tear” damages can turn a good deal bad quickly. And the dealer pretty much has the upper hand. You generally have no bargaining power, unless you’re about to buy or lease another car.

Inflexibility: Young people seem attracted to leases because they feel flexible. But leasing is often less so because it’s much harder to get out of a lease than sell a car (even a car with a loan balance). What happens if you take a job where you can’t have a car? Leaseholders can get really burned.

Miles: A thousand miles per month may sound like a lot to you today, but what if your company moves 35 miles away months from now? Mileage limits can be pretty oppressive, especially in a world of unknowns. The average 20-something holds 7.2 jobs before age 29.

Overall cost: Leasing is more expensive than buying, even with a loan. But here’s a simple way to look at it: Both are methods of financing a car. With leasing, since you’re paying less upfront, you’re borrowing more longer. So, of course, it costs more. Another way to look at it: With leasing, rather than making a down payment upfront, you can make a down payment three years into having the car (buying for its ‘residual value’). That essentially means you’re borrowing more longer.

As with all generalizations, these concepts may be more or less true based on your unique car deal. Remember, everything is negotiable at a dealership: upfront costs; monthly payment; residual value; ‘money factor’ (leasing speak for interest rate). Even mileage is negotiable since you can buy extra miles upfront for less than you’d pay after three years. It’s possible to lower leasing risks through negotiation or car-maker incentives. If so, leasing may be right for you. (A good credit score can give you more bargaining power on auto financing. You can see where your credit currently stands by viewing your two free credit scores, updated each month, on Credit.com.)

The Bottom Line

Leasing is a bit too much like the Eagles’ song “Hotel California” for my taste. Once you check in, it’s pretty hard to check out. Renters turn in cars and get new leases, and they tend to do so at the same dealerships, for the reasons mentioned above. You’ll never escape the monthly car payment. And worse, perhaps you’ll get a good lease deal today, but three years from now, leases could fall out of favor and you’d be stuck.

In the end, leasing is a seductive but generally a bad plan for saving money. But for folks who care less about money and more about having a new car every three years, don’t drive often and lose sleep over repair bill risks, it can make sense.

More on Auto Loans:

Image: VStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team