Home > Personal Finance > Target-Date Funds: Are You Using Them Correctly?

Comments 0 Comments

More middle-class Americans are choosing to place their 401k money in target-date funds. In addition, a rising number of 401k plans use a target-date fund as its default investment.

A target-date fund allows you to choose your expected retirement year (usually in five- or 10-year increments.) It then invests in stocks, bonds and cash equivalents, re-balancing regularly depending on performance and proximity to your selected end date.

Should you keep all your savings in a target-date fund? What are the pros and cons?

A Case Study: Meet Eileen

Eileen is 30 years old, and is excited about her new job with a consulting company. She worries a lot about her retirement, and gets nervous when she hears talk of a coming recession. She enrolls in her company’s 401k plan, which by default puts her savings in a 2050 target-date fund. 2050 is the year she is expected to retire.

Pros

Target-date funds are often best for Eileen and others who are investing without professional help. It is likely a better choice compared to copying a co-worker’s 401k allocation, or asking her uncle what funds to pick.

  • It significantly diversifies her investments. A 2050 fund will usually have four or more funds invested in U.S. stocks, international stocks and bonds.
  • It will give Eileen freedom. Instead of being tempted to adjust her 401k each time she turns on the news, she can worry less knowing her 2050 fund will regularly adjust her portfolio. It will buy more stocks when those are selling at a bargain compared to bonds. Studies show that this “rebalancing” improves portfolio performance.
  • It will make her portfolio more conservative as she approaches retirement. At the start, most of Eileen’s money will be in stocks. By the time she retires in 2050, about half of her portfolio will be in bonds. Bonds provide stability, which Eileen needs when she starts withdrawing from her 401k.

Cons

  • Not all target-date funds are made equal. Some cost a lot more than others. If there are lower-cost alternatives in Eileen’s 401k plan, she can mimic a target-date fund and save money.
  • It may be too aggressive for Eileen’s comfort. Most target-date funds will place folks in their 20s, 30s and early 40s in a portfolio of 90% stocks and 10% bonds. This portfolio can lose 40% of its value in any given year. Those kind of wild swings are only appropriate for people with a high tolerance for risk.

Target-date funds are great options for those who are investing on their own. It provides excellent diversification, and automatically adjusts one’s portfolio. But be aware of the fees involved. They may only be suitable for those who will not panic when stocks dive.

For Eileen’s case, she may decide to still choose a target-date fund, to steer her away from making random or uninformed decisions. But she may opt to pick a 2035 fund, which is slightly more conservative than a 2050 fund.

[Editor’s Note: You can monitor your financial goals like building good credit for free on Credit.com.]

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: Randy Faris/Fuse

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team