Home > Personal Loans > It’s Finally Time to Fix Payday Loans

Comments 0 Comments

Payday loans have a bad rap.

With triple-digit annual percentage rates and exceedingly abbreviated terms (the full value of the loan is typically drafted from a borrower’s bank account immediately following payroll deposit), hapless consumer-debtors often find themselves stuck in an endless cycle of costly renewals that amount to death by a thousand cuts.

A handful of states and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau are attempting to tackle these problems by enacting laws and devising regulations that limit interest rates, fees and the number of successive loan rollovers—and even requiring some honest-to-goodness credit underwriting (a paystub is normally all that’s needed to qualify for these loans). No doubt a good portion of the 12 million consumers who rely on this method of financing worry that doing so will limit its availability.

The fundamental problem, however, isn’t so much the amount that’s charged as it is how quickly the money has to be repaid.

I say that because to the typical customer—an unbanked (no depository relationship) or underbanked (no credit relationship) consumer of uncertain financial literacy—parting with $50 from a $500 paycheck in exchange for $450 worth of cash-in-a-hurry isn’t hard to rationalize. Also, that same upfront charge happens to represent the only way that a lender has to recover in so brief a period the costs it incurs to originate, settle and profit from loans that present a higher-than-average risk of default.

Of course, the thought of paying 10% on a loan that will be outstanding for only one week or two weeks (the simple APR equivalent for that is 520% and 260%, respectively) is repellant to those who don’t share the same dire financial circumstances. But for those who haven’t the choice, it would help if the repayment term was longer and remittances were made in equal periodic installments.

For example, suppose a lender charged a credit-card-comparable rate of 24% interest for a six-month loan that’s designed to be repaid in 13 equal bi-weekly installments (assuming an every-other-week payroll cycle). Not only would the individual payments amount to less than 10% of the originally borrowed amount, but over the term of the loan the lender would also realize more than one and a half times the value of the fee it would otherwise have received upfront.

What’s more, the greater affordability of these payments will also help diminish the risk of default and help borrowers to avoid the destructive pattern of continually rolling over their loans.

Standardizing a longer repayment term, however, isn’t enough. We must also establish a national usury limit that’s APR-based (annual percentage rate calculations mathematically combine interest rates and fees) to govern all types of consumer credit-related products that are offered by all types of lending institutions—banks and nonbanks, online and offline alike. That way, even consumers with limited financial literacy will be able to properly compare the costs for comparably structured transactions.

Look, left to our own devices, most of us would never consider undertaking this type of financing. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do all we can to rehabilitate these products for the benefit of those who are compelled to make a different choice.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its partners.

More on Managing Debt:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team