Home > 2016 > Personal Finance

Are You Actually Putting Too Much Money Away for Retirement?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

If you’re saving for retirement, good for you. You’re doing something that, by all accounts, a lot of Americans aren’t. In fact, the National Institute on Retirement Security estimates that 45%, or 38 million working-age households, do not have any retirement account assets at all.

In a world where most people aren’t saving enough, is it possible you’re actually putting away too much for your retirement?

If you’re following industry standard advice from investment advisers, you could be, according to David Blanchett, head of retirement research for Morningstar Investment Management.

“It’s not that you don’t need to be saving, but if you’re forgoing enjoyment in your life now because you feel pressured to save millions of dollars for retirement, you might want to rethink your plan,” Blanchett said.

Is Conventional Wisdom Just Plain Wrong?

The most common approach to figuring out how much you’ll need for retirement is to apply a generic “replacement rate” to your pre-retirement income, such as 80%, to get the desired retirement income needed, he said. Replacement rate is the pre-retirement income that is paid out upon retirement. But the true cost of retirement is actually highly personalized.

“We find that the actual replacement rate is likely to vary considerably by retiree household, from under 54% to over 87%,” Blanchett noted in his 2013 report.

“I always say that retirement is the most expensive purchase you’re ever going to make,” Blanchett said. “When you go online and you use a lot of these tools, they make very generic assumptions about how long you’re going to live, rates of return, etc. It really makes sense to take the time to model out what you’re actually going to need for retirement.”

As an example, Blanchett notes the rate of inflation. On average, consumption tends to decline among retirees and doesn’t actually keep pace with inflation.

“That’s a pretty big impact in retirement if you draw those differences out over a 20- or 30-year time horizon,” he said.

This holds true not just for self-directed investors, Blanchett added. Financial planners and advisers also can overestimate the amount of retirement money a person needs. There have been numerous reports over the last few years on the “saving-too-much” theory that suggest some advisers may be intentionally scaring investors into saving more than they need to so they can profit from managing more of their money. Yet Blanchett said the issue is less nefarious than that. Advisers simply want to ensure they’ve provided the best, safest advice to their clients.

“Advisers aren’t telling you to save more just so they can add basis points to your savings,” he said. “To me, if I’m an investment adviser and my client is paying me to get to retirement, I want to make sure they’re successful. I don’t want them to sue me because I didn’t tell them to save enough or something else is wrong with my projections.”

The New Standards That Could Benefit You

That conservative approach could become even more pervasive thanks to a Department of Labor announcement just this week that financial advisers will now be held to the “fiduciary standard,” a rule requiring financial advisers to put their clients’ best interests ahead of their own profits. Currently, only financial professionals and firms registered as investment advisers with the Securities and Exchange Commission or individual states follow that rule. Soon, all financial professionals offering investment advice for retirement accounts — including 401(k)s and IRAs — will be included.

“Some advisers, in my opinion, are just way, way too conservative,” Blanchett said.

So if the typical “replacement rate” model isn’t always suitable for retirement plans, how do you figure all the unknowns to know how much you’ll actually need for retirement? First and foremost, talk to your adviser.

“It’s a difficult conversation — it really requires an adviser who understands how these projections work, and at a minimum you want to work … with someone who understands why the model is the way it is, what assumptions they use, etc.,” Blanchett said. “Replacement rates are a really great starting point — 70% to 80% is about right for most people, but it doesn’t really make sense to use replacement rate when you’re approaching retirement. When you’re close, you have an idea of what your consumption is, and the question becomes ‘what’s going to change when I retire?’ If you’re someone who’s going to pay off their mortgage, has been saving 20% of your pay and who has kids who are paying for school, when you retire, your number could be 40%.”

He adds, “Now, if you’re 35 years old, replacement rate definitely makes sense, because who knows what’s going to happen 30 years from now when you retire.”

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: Olena Savytska

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team