Home > 2016 > Personal Finance

Social Security Is Changing Soon. Here’s What You Need to Know

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 1 Comment

There has been much buzz about Social Security recently—and with good reason.

Section 831 of the Bipartisan Budget Act contains the first major change to Social Security claiming rules since the Senior Citizen Freedom to Work Act in 2000. Finding out who is affected and what they need to do is a challenge. The Social Security Administration sent an emergency message to its field offices in February explaining how its employees should implement the changes. The staff in SSA field offices are still trying to get up to speed. Adding to their confusion is the fact that Social Security policy prohibits its agents from giving advice on claiming strategies.

What’s Changing?

The Budget Act was signed into law in November 2014 but has a six-month grace period during which certain folks can still take advantage of the old rules. Social Security has not firmed up these dates, but the best information available suggests that effective April 30, it will no longer be possible to file for benefits and immediately suspend those benefits — a strategy commonly referred to as “file and suspend.” (More on that strategy later.)

The other strategy being eliminated is “restricted application.” This will no longer be an option for beneficiaries born after Jan. 1, 1954. In short, this strategy involves claiming a spousal benefit between ages 66 and 70, thereby allowing your benefit to grow until age 70. At 70, you switch to your own benefit.

If you were born on or before April 30, 1950, you are still eligible to file and suspend. If you already have a suspended benefit, you will not be affected by the change. There are a few reasons why you may want to take advantage of this before April 30.

How These Strategies Work

First, filing and suspending allows your monthly income to grow by a certain amount every year. This is referred to as Delayed Retirement Credits. The kicker with the file and suspend strategy is that if you decide at any point between your full retirement age (FRA) and 70 that delaying your benefits was a bad move, you can request a lump sum of the benefits you missed out on by not claiming at your FRA. This may make sense if you were planning on working until 70, but were unexpectedly laid off and suddenly need that income. Second, filing for a benefit allows eligible beneficiaries to claim a spousal benefit.

Let’s say you want to continue to work, but your spouse didn’t work long enough (10 years or 40 quarters) to qualify for his/her own benefit. You can file and suspend, which would allow you to continue to work, earn delayed retirement credits, and enable your spouse to take half of your full retirement age benefit (PIA). This can also be a nifty strategy for those 66 or older who have minor children because filing and suspending will allow those children to claim a benefit until they turn 18.

The restricted application is often used in conjunction with the file and suspend strategy. It usually makes sense for couples with similar benefits, as illustrated by the following example:

  • John and Jane are married.
  • John: Age: 66
  • SS Benefit (PIA): $1,500/m
  • Jane: Age: 64
  • SS Benefit (PIA): $1,000/m

In this scenario, Jane could file a restricted application for spousal benefits in two years at age 66 and would receive $750/month (half of John’s PIA). This would allow her benefit to grow by 8% over the four years that she collects a spousal benefit. At 70, she would switch back to her benefits based on her own earning record. At that point, she would receive $1,320/month (8% growth every year for four years = $1,000 x 1.32). Here is the catch: John would have to file for benefits in order for Jane to take advantage of this strategy. If John, too, wants to let his benefit grow until age 70, he can file and suspend, but must do it before April 30.

Considering Your Options

The restricted application and file and suspend claiming strategies are now being called “unintended loopholes” by the Social Security Administration, exploited by financial planners and attorneys and the clients they represent. As one of the former, I can confirm that we do use these strategies for most of our clients. By the way, anyone — regardless of his or her wealth — can put these strategies to work.

At this point we are scrambling to make sure that our clients are considering this advice. At our most recent class, a client told us that it took her three months to get an appointment at her local SSA office. The good news is that these strategies can be implemented by phone, at SSA.gov, or in your local office.

Prior to these changes, there were 567 (not a typo) different ways to claim Social Security benefits. There is no way in this column to cover every scenario or even touch on everyone affected. If you think you may be impacted and don’t know what to do, you can contact your financial planner. If you don’t have a financial planner or he or she doesn’t offer Social Security advice, you can consider seeking out one who does. You can ask a planner run the optimal scenario and give you the language to take to SSA.

[Editor’s Note: You can monitor your financial goals (like building good credit) for free on Credit.com.]

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: AndreyPopov

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Kurt Haug

    ” — the fact that Social Security policy prohibits its agents from giving advice on claiming strategies.”….
    Read that again. Slowly. Any one that still believes the government is here to help is not paying attention.

    It is policy to not be helpful. With a complicated financial (pyramid scheme) claim for old(er) people. Government is complicated enough without making it a policy to not help claimants.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team