Home > Credit Cards > Are Universal Credit Cards Really More Secure?

Comments 1 Comment

They go by many names: universal cards, smartcards, supercards, all-in-one cards. Whatever you call them, the concept is the same: a single credit-card-sized and styled device that allows you to virtually carry your credit cards — and even gift, rewards and club cards — in one convenient place.

But from a security standpoint, is it safer than just carrying all of those cards around in your wallet? It could all depend on what security measures the all-in-one-provider put in place, experts say.

“Some may argue that … cards behind the universal card are typically stored in the cloud, and any hacker from around the world could possibly access those cards,” Troy Bernard, Director of EMV & emerging payments with CPI Card Group, a Colorado-based provider in payment card production and related services. “Our response is that the all-in-one card provider must protect the stored information by both encrypting it and tokenizing it, rendering that data useless.”

The process of tokenization replaces card numbers with a set of meaningless numbers that couldn’t be used elsewhere.

In addition to protecting the stored data, when a universal card is used to make purchases, the tokenized card information can also be restricted by the environment that it is used in, Bernard explained in an email.

“This is called domain restriction,” Bernard said. For example, a merchant card can be tokenized and domain restricted to only work at their specific stores; anywhere else, the purchase is not authorized.

“Finally, many of these products leverage the mobile phone as a companion to the all-in-one card. The phone can be used to deactivate the universal card if it is lost or stolen, and the geo-location features in the phone can be used to ensure that the proper owner of the card is with the card at time of purchase.”

So the potential safety features are pretty impressive, right? Well, yes and no.

“From the perspective of an issuer, this appears to be risky in that existing compromised cards available on the black market can be uploaded into this device,” Seth Ruden, a senior fraud consultant with Florida-based ACI Worldwide, explained in an email. “With the potential for data from stolen cards uploaded into this device, the potential for abuse is high, so it requires the provider of a universal card to ‘know their customer’ and validate their identities.”

The big concern, he said, is for security professionals, however, because many all-in-one cards are still relying on magnetic stripes, which are becoming obsolete at the point of sale because they are more susceptible to in-store fraud. Known as card skimming, a criminal electronically copies card data and PIN codes entered by consumers, then copies the data on to a counterfeit card.

“Issuers do not want their cards to be used at point of sale with a magnetic stripe anymore, as the stripe is highly susceptible to compromise, where chip-based transactions are not,” Ruden said.

Losing your all-in-one card may be no more painful than losing a traditional credit card if many of the aforementioned security measures are in place.

“If you lose your all-in-one card, you likely still have the physical cards it consolidates in your possession,” Bernard said. “In addition, one only needs to ‘cancel’ the [universal] card and not the many cards that are linked to it.”

Are Universal Cards the Way of the Future?

Many small, and even not-so-small companies have entered the universal card business in the last few years. While companies might be keen to offer the cards, the reality is that consumers have yet to start using them widely, due in part to how quickly mobile payment solutions are spreading.

“I do see universal [cards] to be a way of the future, but not on the magnetic stripe form factor,” Ruden said. “Chip-based transactions are the ‘future present’ so any universal solution will need to integrate this point-of-sale mode, and that’s the specific element that is designed into the chip, to be resistant to being duplicated or counterfeited. Tokenization of the card will be a solution that will have legs … Apple, Android and Samsung are growing payment modes and do provide greater security, offering dynamic tokens that feature security parameters well beyond what exists on the static element of the magnetic stripe.”

Regardless of the payment options you choose — mobile, all-in-one, or good old-fashioned credit cards, you should check your statements regularly for unauthorized charges. If you find any, call your issuer immediately to dispute the fraud and have the card replaced. And, if you ever have reason to believe your personal information was compromised alongside your payment information, keep an eye on your credit. A sudden drop in credit scores, for instance, can be a sign your identity has been stolen. You can monitor your credit by pulling your credit reports for free each year at AnnualCreditReport.com and viewing your credit scores for free each month on Credit.com.

More on Credit Cards:

Image: sirastock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • https://www.creditangel.co.uk/ Jacqueline O’Donnell

    Does it matter of you have a different card than the others? The thing here is, you are the one holding your own credit cards and of course, it is you who will manage how to spend it. Just a little security will work. Try to secure your identity if it Universal. Good content, though.

    xoxo,
    Jacqueline

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team