Home > 2016 > Identity Theft

Why Everyone’s Getting a Credit Freeze (& Why You Might Want One Too)

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

Credit security freezes are often held up as the gold standard to protect consumers from identity theft. Much more restrictive than traditional fraud alerts, credit freezes prevent anyone from opening up new accounts using a consumer’s Social Security number — including the rightful owner of the number. To get credit, a consumer’s credit report must be “thawed,” generally requiring a phone call and PIN code, barriers most identity thieves simply don’t even try to scale.

Freezes are a bit cumbersome to employ, however, and they sometimes require a fee. (You can check out our full list of states where you can freeze your credit for free here.) Perhaps because of those obstacles, a surprisingly small number of consumers have taken advantage of the freeze option since it became widely available in 2007, despite widespread concerns about ID theft. From 2011 to 2014, freeze users ranged from 130,000 to 160,000 annually, according to data obtained by Credit.com from credit bureau Experian. During that same period, about 600,000 consumers requested initial fraud alerts be placed on their credit files, Experian said.

But that might have changed in 2015. In February 2015 alone — the same month as the high-profile data leak at health insurer Anthem — nearly 160,000 consumers asked Experian for a credit freeze. Through October, the yearly total was 434,000, meaning about triple the consumers used freezes in 2015 than 2014.

Credit freezea copy

Credit bureau TransUnion offered a similar picture. The firm said it received 477,000 freeze requests last year, about double the number of requests in 2014. Credit bureau Equifax declined to provide specific data, but said credit freeze filings were up 30% in 2015.

The data provided by Experian is consistent with an estimate offered in a 2014 paper published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia that analyzed Equifax data. At Credit.com’s request, paper author Julia Cheney estimated that of 168,840 freezes were filed by consumers during 2012, the year the data was examined.

Other high-profile hacks seem to have had some impact on consumers and freeze requests. Experian’s data show freeze requests jumped more than 100% between November 2013 and January 2014, to 21,189 — the Target hack was announced during that span. It’s also worth noting that freeze alerts dropped the following month and didn’t surpass 15,000 again until February 2015 and the Anthem leak.

Ed Mierzwinski, consumer program director of advocacy group the Public Interest Research Group, has been trying to call more attention to the credit freeze option for years. His group published a report, “Why You Should Get Security Freezes Before Your Information Is Stolen,” in October.

“Whether your personal information has been stolen or not, your best protection against someone opening new credit accounts in your name is the security freeze — also known as the credit freeze — not the often-offered, under-achieving credit monitoring,” Mierzwinski wrote in the report.

The Rise of the Credit Freeze

Freezes are a creation of state laws. As identity theft became national concern at around the turn of the century, state legislatures began passing laws requiring that data collectors and credit bureaus do more to protect consumers. California passed the first credit freeze law in 2003, followed by several other states. In 2007, the bureaus said they would make them available to all consumers regardless of state residence.

But even as roughly 10 million consumers each year were hit with identity theft, freeze usage remained low. The Fed report estimated that for every freeze filed, between 8 and 17 fraud alerts were placed during the time span studied. Put another way, consumers favored alerts over freezes by nearly 20 to 1.

Freezes, like alerts, are no panacea. They generally won’t stop an imposter from getting a driver’s license in a victim’s name or filing a fraudulent tax return, for example. And they don’t stop simple credit card fraud. Clever hackers can also defeat freezes by collecting enough information to trick credit bureaus into thawing consumer reports. But generally, freezes are very effective at stopping the type of ID theft that causes the most trouble for consumers — new account fraud, in which a criminal opens up a new credit card or takes out a loan using the victim’s information. This type of fraud can do major credit damage, hurting a consumer’s scores for years depending on the severity of the theft.

“Although somewhat more cumbersome to implement — and thaw — a credit freeze provides greater identity protection than a fraud alert, but cannot be considered the silver bullet,” said Adam Levin, co-founder of Credit.com and author of the new book Swiped: How to Protect Yourself in a World Full of Scammers, Phishers, and Identity Thieves. “It cannot stop a thief from taking over an existing account, nor does it protect against medical, tax-related, or criminal identity theft. It is, however, an important arrow to have in your quiver.”

The Cost of a Credit Freeze

Freezes often aren’t free, however. Fees vary by state. ID theft victims generally can place freezes for free. Others must pay $5 to $10 per credit bureau for an initial freeze, then pay again each time a thaw is needed. At times, getting a thaw can be a challenge — predictably, consumers lose track of the PIN codes required to initiate one, for example — particularly when consumers are trying to close a loan under pressure.

But Mierzwinski is optimistic that consumers seem to be getting the idea that a credit freeze is a good option; and, in his opinion, a better option that paid credit monitoring services.

“(It’s) encouraging that when a breach is horrific that the freeze message gets out, but the paid credit monitoring message is unfortunately still louder,” Mierzwinski says. “The better-protective security freeze is only recently attracting press attention. We hope to change that going forward, and our recent report was part of that.”

If you don’t want to (or feel you don’t need to) put a freeze on your credit report, you should still closely monitor your credit for signs your identity has been stolen. (You can do so by pulling your credit reports for free each year at AnnualCreditReport.com and viewing your credit scores for free each month on Credit.com.) Sudden drops in scores, mysterious addresses or loan accounts you never opened are indicators that fraud may be occurring.

More on Identity Theft:

Image: DigitalVision

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team