Home > 2015 > Managing Debt

When a Debt Collector Pretends to Be the Pizza Guy

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 1 Comment

When the phone rang, the message on the caller ID display was a surprise. Sometimes it said, “Flower Shop.” Or “Pizza Delivery.” Or the name or number of a family member. Or “Repossession Services.”

When consumers answered the phone, the ruse continued. An operator gave the impression that flowers or pizza were on the way, but more information was needed — such as the consumer’s location or the location of their car.

In reality, the operators were debt collectors working for auto lenders Westlake Financial Services or Wilshire Consumer Credit, alleges the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The tactic was among the revelations made public last week in a consent order signed by the bureau and the collection agencies. Westlake, based in Los Angeles, services auto loans — often for borrowers with poor credit. Wilshire, a wholly owned subsidiary of Westlake, both offers and services auto title loans.

The firms used a tool called “Skip Tracy” (“skip tracing” is a term used by collectors to mean searching for updated information on consumers) to falsify Caller ID data and trick borrowers into answering the phone or returning calls. The system was efficient, and went beyond the telephonic hacking. It helped employees keep the story straight, the CFPB said.

“When call recipients returned a call to one of the phone numbers associated with Caller ID information that had been changed using Skip Tracy, that system showed … employees the Caller ID text associated with the original outgoing call,” the consent order says. “When (employees) put these phrases into the Caller ID information … collectors usually pretended during the call that they worked for businesses or departments matching those descriptions.”

The CFPB alleges that Westlake/Wilshire used Skip Tracy to contact consumers with over 137,000 accounts from 2010 to 2014.

In a statement emailed to Credit.com by Chief Compliance Officer Robert Engilman, Westlake said it consented to the issuance of a consent order “without admitting or denying any of the findings…and did so in order to avoid lengthy and costly litigation.” The statement also said the allegations relate to practices “that were ceased long ago,” and that the firm is committed to meeting all regulatory and legal requirements.

Fear & Money

The alleged practices include convincing borrowers that their cars were on the verge of being repossessed when that wasn’t true, the CFPB says.

“When (Westlake/Wiltshire) made debt collection calls and changed the Caller ID text to display ‘Repo,’ ‘Repossession Services,’ ‘Asset Recovery,’ or other names suggesting repossession, or when (they) told borrowers they were calling from repossession companies or similar third-party businesses, they gave borrowers the false impression that they were in the process of repossessing the borrowers’ vehicles,” the consent order says.

Such misrepresentations violate the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, the CFPB said.

The CFPB also claims that employees pretended to be family members.

“(The firms) also used Skip Tracy to manipulate the information on Caller ID and make it look like the call originated from a family member or friend of the borrower … In fact, the Borrowers’ family members or friends played no role in originating these calls,” the order says.

Even after borrowers’ cars were repossessed, the firm continued to use Skip Tracy illegally, the CFPB said.

“Westlake and Wilshire called consumers whose vehicles had already been repossessed and used Skip Tracy to make it appear the calls were coming from a party associated with the word ‘Storage.’ During some of these calls, the companies’ debt collectors implied that the vehicles would be released if the borrowers made a partial payment on the account,” the CFPB claims. “However, the companies would actually only release a repossessed vehicle after a borrower paid the full amount due. As a consequence, some borrowers paid the amount agreed upon during the phone call, but their vehicles were not released.”

The CFPB also alleges that Westlake unfairly altered the terms of borrowers’ loans.

“In some cases, the companies changed the due dates or extended the terms of loans without borrowers’ permission, causing more interest to accrue, while telling consumers that the extensions would have a positive effect,” the bureau said.

The Bureau ordered the companies to overhaul their debt collection practices and to provide consumers $44.1 million in cash relief and balance reductions. The companies will also pay a civil penalty of $4.25 million.

“There’s no excuse for lying to your customers, and today’s action will provide millions of dollars in relief for borrowers caught up in Westlake and Wilshire’s deception,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Consumers struggling to pay their bills deserve to be treated with respect, not subjected to illegal threats and deceptive phone calls. We will continue to clean up the debt collection market and root out these illegal and inexcusable practices.”

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://www.paydayloanindustryblog.com/ Jer Trihouse

    Despicable! Another reminder there are people doing stupid things in every industry. Love payday lenders and car title loan lenders, or hate them, we can debate the merits of the industry. But the strategy apparently employed by Wilshire is unacceptable.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team