Home > 2015 > Mortgages

The New Foreclosure Threat: Troubled HELOCs & Second Mortgages

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 1 Comment

Prior to the financial crisis of 2008, when the real estate market was still thriving and properties were increasing in value year after year, it was very common for homeowners to take out second mortgages or home equity lines of credit (HELOCs). I’ve written previously about the financial shock many homeowners are now experiencing, as HELOCs they acquired in 2005-2006 begin reaching the 10-year mark, where they commonly reset from interest-only payments to repayment of principal and interest. In recent months though, as I coach people facing difficult decisions about their properties and mortgages, I’ve seen a new issue arise for certain homeowners. These owners are currently living in their home, are in good standing on their first mortgage, but have long been in default on their second mortgage or HELOC.

This is a situation that represents a definite risk of foreclosure, yet my experience has been that many people do not understand this reality and seem totally oblivious to the risk. Let’s take a closer look at some of the mistaken assumptions people are making, and what you need to know if you’re facing a similar scenario.

Do Second Lien Creditors Have the Right to Foreclose?

One of the most common assumptions people make is that a second position lienholder (the lender who issued the second mortgage or HELOC) does not have the legal right to foreclose while the first mortgage is currently being paid on time. Another variation on this misunderstanding is that the second lienholder doesn’t have the power to foreclose without the full cooperation of the first lienholder. Both of these assumptions are totally false!

There is no question, in either instance, that a second lienholder has the right to initiate a foreclosure. All that is necessary is for the second lender to absorb the cost of the foreclosure. Once the property has been sold at auction, the second lender must still pay the first mortgage balance before they can recover any proceeds towards the defaulted note or the costs of bringing the action. But there is nothing about a first mortgage that blocks foreclosure by a second lender.

What About the Statute of Limitations?

“I’m past the statute of limitations in my state, so they can’t come after me anymore.” I hear this misunderstanding frequently as well. Homeowners learn that their state has, say, a four-year statute of limitations for legal actions following a contractual default, and they assume this applies to their unpaid second mortgage. It’s true that the statute period may come into play in situations where a home has already been lost to foreclosure and a residual deficiency balance remains after the sale. In many cases, lenders can file a lawsuit to recover such unpaid balances. In that situation, the second lien gets extinguished on sale of the property, so the statute of limitations can definitely be a factor.

However, if you still live in the property and it has not been foreclosed on, then the second lien remains intact. And there is no statute of limitations for active property liens. All of the rights associated with that lien remain whether or not in default, and without regard to any limitation on duration. So it doesn’t matter if you haven’t paid the second mortgage in five years and your state has a four-year statute of limitations. The lender still has a right to foreclose.

What If a Property Is ‘Underwater’?

Another common mistake people make is believing the risk of foreclosure is virtually non-existent as long as the house continues to be “underwater.” This is by no means a safe assumption to make. For one thing, many people fail to distinguish between a home that is underwater relative to the total mortgage debt (first and second loans combined) compared to one that is underwater against the first loan alone. Those are two completely different risk profiles. It’s crucial to understand why, so let’s look at some examples:

If a Home Is Fully Underwater…

Your property’s current fair market value is $300,000. You owe $350,000 on the first mortgage, which is paid current, while your defaulted second mortgage of $50,000 remains unresolved. In this case, there is no equity covering the second mortgage at all, since the home is worth less than the balance owed on the first mortgage alone. In situations like this, it is unusual to see the original lender proceed with a foreclosure. Foreclosures can be expensive to process. A lending institution that has already been forced to write off $50,000 is not likely to risk another potential $50,000 in foreclosure costs, only to take back a property that will sell for an amount insufficient to cover the first loan’s balance. This property, in other words, is truly “underwater.”

If a Property Is Partly Underwater…

Your property’s current fair market value is $400,000. You owe $350,000 on the first mortgage, which is paid current, while your defaulted second mortgage of $100,000 remains unresolved. The total mortgage is therefore $450,000 on a home worth $400,000, so at first glance it looks like the home is underwater, right? Well, not really. To be precise, it is only partly underwater, because a sale of the house would cover all of the first mortgage and some of the second mortgage. In this example, there is $50,000 of home value covering the unpaid $100,000 second mortgage, so that loan is actually 50% “in the money.” Would a lender initiate foreclosure under these conditions? There is still the matter of costs to consider, but $50,000 in equity is sufficient to cover the cost of most foreclosure actions, so these figures definitely represent a property at risk.

If There’s Positive Equity in Your Home

Your home’s value has bounced back to being worth $500,000. You owe $350,000 on the first mortgage, which is paid current, and your defaulted second mortgage of $100,000 remains unpaid. The total mortgage debt of $450,000 is exceeded by the price of the home, with $50,000 of positive equity. Obviously, this home is not underwater at all, and is therefore a logical target for foreclosure by the second lienholder. In addition to the risk of foreclosure itself, there is also the risk of losing some or all of the $50,000 of paper equity to foreclosure costs and a below-market auction price (which is common for distressed sales).

Why Should I Worry Now?

The real estate crash happened seven years ago. Since then we’ve seen a general trend of rising property values. It’s crucial for homeowners to understand that the risk associated with defaulted second mortgages increases as the property climbs in value over time. The concern here is that this risk may develop at a point when the homeowner is no longer paying much attention, perhaps several years after the original default. With little to no collection activity during that whole time, it is tempting for people to think nothing will happen in the future. But this attitude fails to account for the higher risk that comes with a rising property value.

If the default took place at a time when the house was worth less than the first mortgage alone (as per the first scenario above), there was no point from the lender’s perspective to foreclose on the property. As time has gone by, however, and the value of the home has risen, it may now be only partly underwater or even have positive equity again. The risk is then much higher that the lender will “wake up” and attempt to recover their loss via foreclosure. In an upcoming piece, I’ll discuss why settling your second mortgage or HELOC may be your best option for keeping your home and moving on from the debt.

More on Mortgages & Homebuying:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • AZKC

    This is odd. We had same lender on our lst mtg and our large Heloc. Always current on the lst mtg. The Heloc lender (primary residence) foreclosed…held a Trustee’s Sale on the Heloc lien, and the winner and only bidder now owns the home.

    We stopped paying on the remaining lst mtg., obviously, moved out and new owner has renters in the place. The lst mortgage lender promptly sold the servicing on the lst to another Servicer, it’s a Fannie Mae loan. They have been calling and sending the Notice of Intent to Accelerate, so we actually answered a call today, told them the Heloc lender had foreclosed, we don’t own the home, and that is why we stopped paying on the lst mtg.

    Evidently in AZ, they can now foreclose again, on the lst mortgage this time, and the guy who got the house at the first Trustee’s Sale is out his investment.

    So, they certainly did not put the money from the Heloc sale toward the lst mtg as it says in this article. They put it towards the lien being auctioned, as that now shows a Zero balance in our online banking and shows as a Foreclosure on our credit.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team