Home > Credit Score > Op-Ed: Getting to the Facts About Employer Credit Checks

Comments 0 Comments

In politics, like in war, truth is often the first casualty.

The recent piece by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.) decrying the use of credit reports for employment purpose was the latest example.

There is no evidence to support the claim that employers are “unfairly shutting the door on (job) applicants with less-than-stellar credit” and no self-respecting employer would want to do so. Let’s stick to facts, and the facts according to a 2012 survey from the Society for Human Resource Management are:

  • Less than half (47%) of organizations use credit reports for employment.
  • Of those that do, most initiate credit checks after a contingent job offer (58%) or after the job interview (33%).
  • Few companies (2%) initiate credit checks before a job interview.
  • The top two reasons companies conduct credit checks on job candidates are to reduce/prevent theft and embezzlement (45%) and to reduce legal liability for negligent hiring (22%).
  • 80% of companies have hired a job candidate whose credit report contained adverse or negative information.

Regarding the use of credit reports for employment purposes, these two members of Congress refuse to acknowledge the existing evidence that shows a solid link between the two. Two separate studies have found that credit report data has an impact on financial or personal information theft.

A study by Edward Oppler, et al., showed a correlation between using a credit report for employment purposes and “counterproductive work behavior,” defined as theft and related behaviors. In short, Oppler concluded that employees with financial history concerns were significantly more likely to engage in counterproductive work behavior than those without financial concerns. In fact, a job applicant with a troubled financial history was almost twice as likely to engage in theft as an applicant who lacked any financial history issues.

A 2014 study by the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners showed the importance of managing risks via the use of a credit report. It notes that global occupational fraud accounts for nearly $3.7 trillion annually. The average theft totals more than $145,000, but that number increases to $154,000 for organizations with less than 100 employees. The top two red-flag warnings (77%) present in these crimes were instances where the fraudster was living beyond his or her financial means or experiencing financial difficulties. That’s important because employee fraud and theft can very well determine whether a small business survives or not.

Finally, the authors’ comments on credit report accuracy offer less than half the story. The Federal Trade Commission report they cite confirmed that only 2% of credit reports contained errors that would impact an individual’s creditworthiness. Even at that, these errors are resolved quickly and the federal law regulating use of credit reports by employers mandates unique protections for prospective employees.

While this issue strikes an emotional chord with some consumers and deservedly so, it’s always better to discuss an issue with all the facts present and in a completely transparent manner.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its partners.

More on Credit Reports & Credit Scores:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team