Home > Mortgages > Why Refinancing Isn’t As Easy As You Think

Comments 1 Comment

Homeowners who haven’t gone touched their mortgage in recent years are often astonished at the amount of paperwork they’ll need in the refinancing process today. If you haven’t refinanced or gotten a mortgage in the past five years, here’s what you need to know to get up to speed.

Paperwork to Compile

Scrounging up supporting documentation for your application is most applicants’ least favorite thing to do, but it’s unfortunately necessary in order to be granted a mortgage refinance.

If you’re a W-2 employee, you’ll be expected to provide the following:

  • Past two years’ federal income tax returns
  • Past two years’ W-2s
  • Your most recent 30-day pay stubs
  • Your bank statements/asset statements for the past 60 days
  • A copy of your current mortgage statement

If you are self-employed, you’ll be expected to provide the following:

  • Past two years’ federal income tax returns
  • A year-to-date profit and loss statement
  • Bank statements/assets for the most recent past 60 days
  • A copy of your current mortgage statement

This is the minimum documentation your bank, mortgage lender or mortgage broker will need before they begin unraveling your finances. Make no mistake, getting a mortgage these days is a documentation-heavy process and is necessary to show you meet the federal ability to repay requirements.

What Happens in Mortgage Underwriting

The mortgage process involves creating, documenting and structuring a loan package, and presenting the file to a decision-maker who ultimately will approve the loan, deny the loan or suspend the loan. Loans with obstacles are generally not denied, but are rather suspended with an exact reason — such as the borrower’s debt-to-income ratio being too high, having a previous foreclosure or a slew of other possibilities. A suspended loan is simply a need for more documentation or a need for clarification of a specific problem. If the problem can be corrected, the loan can still move forward. Here is the loan flow:

Loan Package Submitted to Underwriting

Loan Approved With Conditions

Conditions Come in From Borrower & Resubmitted Back to Underwriting

More Conditions Added or Loan Is Final Approved

Final Approval/ Clear to Close

Docs Ordered

Sign Docs

Fund & Record

Once your lender submits your loan to underwriting, “prior to doc” conditions are created. These “prior to doc” conditions generally require more administrative paperwork from the borrower in order to get final loan approval (i.e. the green light for closing). This might mean providing additional pay-stubs, additional bank statements, a profit and loss statement showing the income consistent with the tax returns, or addressing questions underwriting might have regarding the financial documentation you presented. Think of these conditions as the final missing gaps of clarity needed to complete your loan review.

Where Challenges May Arise

The most difficult stage in the home lending process is when documentation is submitted to underwriting — it can create more conditions, more questions and further needs to provide more documentation. Until the condition information is deemed acceptable by the loan underwriter, the requests to you for more information can be continual.

A good mortgage lender will perform its due diligence in the originating of your mortgage refinance. This includes thoroughly reviewing any documentation supplied by the consumer before it’s set in front of the decision-maker, in an effort to make sure the information supplied fully satisfies each condition. Be informed. Loan officers are not underwriters. Loan officers, loan processors and operational support do not make credit decisions on behalf of the lender. The final decision-maker is the underwriter — always was, always will be. A good rule of thumb is to work with a loan professional that either has underwriting experience or can demonstrate their specific knowledge in underwriting guidelines.

Working with a skilled mortgage originator can greatly help mitigate the back-and-forth communication consumers may find difficult or annoying when applying for a mortgage or a refinance. A consumer may say, “All I want to do is refinance my house and save $300 per month and get out of PMI and I have to go through all this rigmarole over documentation?” While understandable, the heavy documentation can be justified. In almost every instance, it’s worth providing the documentation and going through the conditions with your banker in order to financially benefit. A one-time supply of documentation and questioning in exchange for a long-term financial benefit is really what it boils down to.

The homeowners who find the mortgage process daunting tend to be the ones who have not refinanced in years; while their previous refinance experience was likely simple and quick. The old concept that working with your current bank or current lender is somehow going to be easier is also generally not the case, either. Don’t be fooled. Banks want your business, especially the bank in danger of losing your payments when you refinance them away. Lending, for the most part, is a level playing field. Loan providers want the same supporting documentation, and your current servicer does not save this information. Additionally, no mortgage company has a monopoly on the market, although some banks my offer expanded credit criteria, such as needing less equity for example, but at the cost of either more income, less debt or perhaps an ultra-high credit score. (You can get your credit scores for free on Credit.com if you’re not sure where you stand.)

Essentially, the more organized you are from the start can potentially help you cut down on the additional paperwork and questions in the processing of your refinance. Make sure to provide all financial documentation and explain all details to your lender so they can properly structure your loan with the best possible combination of rate, costs and benefits.

More on Mortgages & Homebuying:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • j jonston

    In serveral cases I have observed the apraised value of a house when it is sold is X dollars, when that figure may be as much as 30-40% over the Indiana tax apparaised value. A year or two later when a re-fi is attempted, the appraised value suddenly is very near that of the tax appraisal value. A neighbor hired a certified appraisor under the pretext of planning to privately sell his house to perform an appraisal of his property. This appraisor is also used by local financial institutions. thje figure arrived at by the appraisal was about 12% over the Indiana property tax appraisal.
    The neighbor went the next week to apply for a re-fi. the financial instuttion ordered an appraisal. This appraisal resulted in a value approximately $30,000 less, or about 17% less than the appraisal for an “intended sale.” ($200,000 house).
    This pattern tends to lead one to suspect colusion between real estate groups and mortgage originators.
    Indiana propety tax appraisals are always dead-on, but the seems to be realistic for the most part.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team