Home > 2015 > Identity Theft

‘My Country Didn’t Have My Back’: OPM Breach Victim, Veteran Speaks Out

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

David Thul served 22 years with the Minnesota National Guard, and even though he was a dedicated and loyal service member, Thul — like any employee and employer — had some frustrations with the military. After a stint in Kosovo in 2003 and deployment to Iraq from 2005 to 2007, Thul retired last year, thinking those work-related annoyances were behind him.

In June, he received a letter from the federal Office of Personnel Management, informing him that his information was among millions of records stored in a hacked government database, and he would receive 18 months of free credit monitoring to help him identify any fraud that may arise from the compromised information. The government announced Thursday that more than 21 million Social Security numbers had been exposed in the breach.

The letter didn’t say exactly what of Thul’s data had been taken, only that it related to him having to apply for a security clearance. He did that more than a decade ago, in order to go to Kosovo. That security clearance, as he recalls, involved a 41-page application, including not only detailed information about himself but also his family — his wife and two children.

Iraq 1He noticed the credit monitoring offer only applied to him, even though he believes his wife and children’s identities were exposed.

“It’s really frustrating to think that my family might suffer from my information having been stolen,” Thul said. “It’s hard to grasp the concept of it. … This is everything about you.”

Thul hasn’t yet noticed any signs of fraudulent activity in his name or any other identity theft indicators, but he’s researching identity protection services for him and his family. Before this happened, he said he wouldn’t have even known what to look for.

He’d like to know exactly what information was stolen. Was it the full 41-page security clearance application? Just a part of it? Was his family’s information hacked, too? He said he wants more details from the OPM, so he can better protect himself and his family.

Thul is far from alone in his frustration and desire for answers.

“I’ve talked to a number of people who are members of the House and Senate whose information is in there,” said Adam Levin, an expert on identity theft and co-founder of Credit.com and IDT911. “They’re very angry, and they’re very worried.”

Levin recommends taking advantage of whatever the government offers but also looking to other resources to help monitor for identity theft. Many insurance providers, banks and employers offer a credit monitoring or identity monitoring product to customers or employees for free or little cost, so you should inquire about or sign up for such programs. Here’s a guide on how to use free credit monitoring tools.

That’s just the damage-control part, Levin said. Signing up for a service isn’t enough — you have to regularly check your free annual credit reports, credit scores (you can do that for free on Credit.com), bank statements and any account that could be abused by a fraudster.

These are things everyone should do, not just people who had their information stolen in the OPM breach, because identity theft is a constant and costly threat. Still, the fact that it’s a common problem doesn’t make it any easier to tolerate.

“It’s a pretty crummy feeling that I served my country and my country didn’t have my back on this issue,” Thul said. “You trust the military and the government with your information and they apparently didn’t do a good job protecting it.”

More on Identity Theft:

Images courtesy of David Thul

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team