Home > Credit Cards > Think You Won Your Credit Card Dispute? Not So Fast

Comments 4 Comments

When Carlo Deslate successfully disputed a credit card charge after a major travel mishap, he thought he had put the problem behind him. But five months later he received a bill from the online travel company through which he booked the tickets. If he didn’t pay, he was told, the balance could be turned over to collections. Worried a collection account could ruin his good credit scores, he posted a question on the Credit.com blog, asking what his rights are. His plea for help raised an important question: Can a merchant charge you directly after you win a credit card dispute?

Carlo Deslate

Carlo Deslate

There may be more riding on this question than it seems at first blush. If a dispute simply shifts the debt from the credit card to the merchant, is the consumer really protected?

“Every time a credit card dispute goes the customer’s way and the company goes back and sends it to collections, the whole credit card dispute process becomes less effective,” says Christopher Elliott who helps solve consumer problems on his blog Elliott.org. He’s seen this kind of scenario before and it concerns him. The ability to dispute charges is “why we recommend consumers use a credit card,” he adds.

The Truth In Lending Act is the federal law that gives consumers the legal right to dispute credit card charges if there is a billing error, which includes when “property or services are not delivered to the consumer as agreed.” That law spells out card issuer’s responsibilities when cardholders file disputes. (Generally, issuers must investigate and resolve the matter within two billing cycles.) But the law is silent on the merchant’s role in this process. Instead, how merchants respond to credit card disputes is spelled out in the merchant agreements they sign when they agree to accept credit cards for payment.

“If a consumer successfully disputes a charge, the merchant can still attempt to collect from the consumer by challenging the chargeback. This can typically be done by providing documentation that the transaction was valid,” says Shawn Budde, CEO of 2Checkout, a payment processing company. But if the credit card charge is refunded, “Many payment processing systems would not allow a merchant to directly charge a consumer’s card after a chargeback.”

However that doesn’t stop them from trying to collect payment directly from consumers. A review of some merchant agreements found online were silent on the issue of whether they can subsequently try to collect from consumers. And when we asked the major card companies whether their merchant agreements restrict this practice, only American Express responded, saying in an email that, “American Express has an established charge dispute process in place that takes into account both the Card Member and the merchant perspectives. Our policies do not prohibit a merchant from seeking to collect payment from a Card Member for a transaction that is charged back to a merchant.”

Two Sides to the Story

Whether or not the merchant can come after the consumer for payment, “depends on the reason for the chargeback,” says Justin Hosie, a partner in the law firm Hudson Cook LLP. “If the consumer literally didn’t even receive an item/services, and a charge appears, then the answer would be ‘no,’ (but) the consumer shouldn’t get a windfall, or get to use the chargeback system to commit fraud either,” he says.

Indeed, an artist recently complained on the Credit.com blog about a situation in which a client allegedly ordered a custom sculpture, the creation of which involved 10 meetings. It was delivered to “rave reviews,” says the artist. But the client then disputed the charge with the card issuer, and successfully received a refund even though the sales receipt stated “no refunds.” The client has refused to respond to calls or emails from the sculptor since. “Correct me if I am wrong, but would this not be considered theft?,” the artist wrote. “He got his money and kept the sculpture too.”

There are even some similarities between these types of situations and medical bill disputes with insurance companies. A consumer may still be responsible for paying for the service they received even if their insurance didn’t cover it.

It’s Not Over Until It’s Over

In Deslate’s situation, he said he booked flights to South America through an online travel agency. His itinerary took him to Panama, Peru, and then on to Brazil where he planned to watch the World Cup. However, he says that when he tried to connect from Peru to Brazil, the ticket counter for the connecting flight he was supposed to be on was already closed and he was unable to make his connection. He says he called the travel agency immediately, and they refused to help, as did the airline where he held the ticket. He ended up purchasing a ticket to return home. The travel agency, however, did not have a record of his call.

After a series of emails and phone calls between an executive with the travel agency and Deslate in which he documented his attempts to contact them for help the day of the incident, they reached a settlement. But Deslate said it was a frustrating and completely unexpected ordeal. “I thought the credit card dispute took care of it,” he said.

The lesson for consumers? The chargeback is still a powerful tool and credit cards still carry the best purchase protections for consumers making major purchases as well as online transactions.

But if you lodge a dispute, make sure you have a valid reason for doing so, and keep documentation of your side of the story just in case. It could pop up again when you least expect it. Having proof of what transpired could just make the difference when it comes to keeping the refund you’ve received, as well as saving your credit scores, since collection accounts can have a significant impact on your credit. You can see where your credit scores stand for free on Credit.com.

More Money-Saving Reads:

Main image: iStock; inset image: Adam Deslate

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • TwoCentsatLeast

    I had this issue with ZipCar. They billed me for annual membership after I cancelled after a trial period. I never used them again. 2 years later, I noticed they charged me for annual membership. Discover removed that charge and one from the year before, which I had missed. (I guess I didn’t cancel “enough”.)
    Six months or more later, they sent me fake collections notices from within their own building. I formally complained with the State Attorney General. They agreed to stop billing me, but implied the door was still open to be billed again. I am not their customer. It’s sad, but so many businesses and municipalities just want to grab money any way they can. Most people will roll over and pay.

  • chgam93

    So what the consumer can do if the merchant sends a bill after the chargeback is successfully disputed?

  • ar bor

    lucky we live in Australia and credit scores are less relevant, therefore we can just collect proof and lodge chargebacks at free will….

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team