Home > 2015 > Personal Finance

Prenup vs. Postnup: Which Is Better?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

Hearts, flowers, love, prenuptial agreement. Remember the old Sesame Street song that went “One of these things is not like the others, one of these things just doesn’t belong.” That’s the feeling of dread that often accompanies a discussion about a prenuptial agreement. But what if you wait? Maybe have that nasty talk after you get married? Is there a difference between having a prenuptial agreement (which is negotiated and signed before marriage) or a postnuptial agreement (which is negotiated and signed during marriage)?

With a good deal of first marriages ending in divorce (and the rate is even worse for subsequent marriages), having the financial details of your marriage worked out can be a blessing. Divorce is often included as one of the top most traumatic events in a person’s life. Being able to quickly handle the financial details once you have decided to part ways can often be a godsend.

A prenuptial agreement must be accompanied by full financial disclosure. This ideally not only means a financial statement, but all of the bank statements, tax returns and deeds to support the information on the financial statement. In a perfect world, the signed document is then placed into a binder along with the financial statement and the support documentation and is stored like that until it may be needed. If one spouse later finds out that the other spouse failed to properly disclose financial information, the agreement could be found invalid and unenforceable, meaning it could be totally set aside. The divorce would then be treated as if there was never an agreement in place. Other ways that the prenuptial agreement could be set aside is if the court would find that one party entered into the agreement under duress. To alleviate this issue, it is recommended that the agreement not be presented to the soon-to-spouse at the church just before the ceremony. That might end badly. The further in advance that the agreement is signed the better.

Want to protect your future income? Retirement account contributions? Appreciation on your non-marital business? Then a prenuptial agreement is the only way to get that done. Without that document, all of the above becomes marital the day you say “I do.”

When You’re Already Married

Postnuptial agreements require many of the same elements that prenuptial agreements do. Courts generally like to see full financial disclosure (or, sometimes with postnuptial agreements the spouse can demonstrate a “general and proximate knowledge” simply because they had been married and in a position to “know,” but that can be risky so full financial disclosure is best), and that the agreement was entered into freely and voluntarily.

The main thing to remember with postnuptial agreements is that because there wasn’t a prenuptial agreement to begin with, many of the assets that may have been acquired during the marriage have already become “marital,” such as retirement assets, stock options that have vested and been earned during the marriage, or real estate that was purchased with earnings during the marriage. Thus, the agreement will have to address what’s going to happen with these already marital assets.

Both types of agreements should be as specific as possible. Spell out exactly what’s happening with assets, earnings, appreciation (active and passive) and real estate. Be clear about who is paying which bills and how. Be precise about future alimony payments – how much will they be, when will they be paid, and for how long? Or is there a waiver of support? Also, include a provision for attorney fees. Will there be a clause providing that if either party challenges the agreement unsuccessfully that person is now on the hook for both parties’ fees?

So what can’t be handled by either type of agreement? Anything to do with children – present or future. Courts have a duty to determine what is in the “best interests of the children,” so any predetermination of children’s issues will likely to be found unenforceable.

In conclusion, both types of agreements can be found valid and enforceable and both types of agreements can simplify a potentially traumatic divorce situation, but prenuptial agreements are a bit “cleaner” because they can prevent the accumulation of any “marital” assets before they even begin to be acquired. In the long run though, a solid agreement streamlines a divorce and that’s better than no agreement at all.

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team