Home > Identity Theft > More Americans Live Under Cloud of ‘Data Uncertainty’

Comments 0 Comments

From government surveillance and behavior-based advertising, to social media and search-engine tracking, there are plenty of ways for Americans to lose their privacy online. With such a long trail of digital crumbs that online users leave behind, are they even worried anymore about losing privacy, or is that par for the course in the digital age?

Turns out, the majority of Americans still place high value on their privacy. Yet few are confident that the entities collecting the data can be trusted to keep it private and secure.

Those were the findings in a recent report by the Pew Research Center, “Americans’ Attitudes About Privacy, Security and Surveillance.”

How the USA FREEDOM Act impacts the privacy concerns of Americans remains to be seen.

The legislation was approved by the Senate on Tuesday. It already has been approved by the House, and President Barack Obama has promised to sign it into law. The bill reforms the way the National Security Agency collects phone data — ending bulk surveillance, which was deemed illegal last month by a federal appeals court.

However, the USA FREEDOM Act extends through 2019 several other top provisions of the 2001 Patriot Act that expired on June 1.

(USA FREEDOM is an acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Fulfilling Rights and Ending Eavesdropping, Dragnet-collection and Online Monitoring.)

The Center for Democracy and Technology hailed the Senate move as a victory but called for further action from Congress.

“Passage of the USA FREEDOM Act is the most significant national security surveillance reform measure in the past three decades,” said CDT Advocacy Director Harley Geiger in a statement, “but the bill does not solve all the problems with surveillance.”

Watchers Are Everywhere

Meanwhile, the Pew report underscores the citizenry’s sense of powerlessness regarding the enormous size of the data “warehouses” — maintained both by the government and the commercial sectors.

Mary Madden and Lee Rainie, the authors of the report, wrote that events like the Snowden revelations and multiple retail security breaches “have contributed to a cloud of personal ‘data insecurity’ that now looms over many Americans’ daily decisions and activities.”

Using a recent study as well as previous surveys by Pew Research, the two authors found that Americans still find privacy important “in their daily lives in a number of essential ways.”

“Yet, they have a pervasive sense that they are under surveillance when in public and very few feel they have a great deal of control over the data that is collected about them and how it is used,” they wrote.

Among Pew’s most recent findings:

  • Of the 461 adults surveyed, 74% felt it’s “very important” for them to control who can get their information, and an additional 19% find that “somewhat important.”
  • The majority — 65% — felt it’s “very important” to control what information is collected, and an additional 25% that it’s “somewhat important.”
  • Those surveyed had strong feelings about not having someone watching or listening to them without permission.

When it comes to the consumers’ trust in data collectors’ ability to maintain the privacy and security of the information, however, the numbers were skewed to the opposite side of the scale in a separate, earlier Pew survey of nearly 500 adults.

Who’s in the Driver’s Seat?

Half of the respondents in that survey felt they have “not much control” (37%) or “no control at all” (13%) over how their information is being collected and used.

Fewer than 10% felt “very confident” about all categories of entities that collect data — with credit card companies earning the highest trust (9%) and online video and social media sites as well as online advertisers having the most dismal rate (1%).

The numbers of Americans who felt “somewhat confident” in the same entities ranged between 6%and 29%, once again with credit card companies inspiring the most confidence. The 11 categories also included land-line and mobile phone companies, government agencies, retailers and email providers.

Despite those feelings, the majority of the consumers haven’t changed their behavior to improve their privacy by doing things like clearing browser cookies and refusing to give information not relevant to the transaction.

And a slim number have encrypted phone calls, text messages or emails (10%), or used tools for surfing online anonymously (9%).

Not surprisingly, one area Americans feel strongly about is limiting Internet and telephone data collected by the government. Pew found that the more Americans knew about government surveillance, the less they felt in control of their data.

More on Data Privacy:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team