Home > 2015 > Students

Inequality & Student Loan Debt: 5 Troubling Stats

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 1 Comment

The rising cost of attending college has had a serious impact on the finances of most students and their families, but the burden has been distributed unequally. Various studies point to the negative, long-term effects of taking on education debt, and considering debt levels vary greatly by race and socioeconomic status, there’s concern over how trying to get a college education actually exacerbates inequality in America.

Demos, a progressive public policy organ ization, published “The Debt Divide” in May to highlight research that points to growing inequality in higher education and how that translates to postgraduate well-being. The 30-page report covers a lot of ground, citing data from Department of Education surveys, the Federal Reserve’s 2013 Survey of Consumer Finances, Gallup polls and other existing research, and some of the figures may give you a different perspective on the state of education debt in the U.S.

1. Black and low-income students borrow more than others to receive a bachelor’s degree.

Among bachelor’s degree recipients in 2012, black graduates from public colleges borrowed an average of of $29,344, compared with $25,807 for white graduates and $23,441 for Hispanic or Latino graduates. For those who earned degrees from private nonprofit schools, debt levels were understandably higher (they’re more expensive, generally), but white students borrowed significantly less than the other two subgroups. Hispanic or Latino graduates took on an average of $36,266 in debt, black graduates had $35,477 and white graduates had $31,508.

There’s a similar gap when looking at the wealth of student borrowers. Students who received Pell Grants (which are awarded on basis of financial need) had higher education debt loads than those who did not receive Pell Grants. For public-school graduates, the difference in debt was $27,307 (Pell recipient) to $22,888, and at private nonprofits, it was $34,206 and $30,089.

2. White and high-income students are least likely to take out student loans.

At public institutions of higher educations, Latino students are least likely to have debt — about 63% borrow, the same as white students, and Latino students borrowed an average of $2,400 less than white students. Other than that, white students have the lowest debt burdens and are least likely to borrow in the first place.

The vast majority of black students use loans to pay for college. Among those who graduated from a public school, 81% had student loans, and 86% of private school graduates had student loans. Latino students at private schools were most likely to have debt, with 87% graduating with loan balances.

The difference is much more stark when you look at income level. At public schools, 84% of students who receive Pell Grants also graduate with student loans, compared to 46% of those who don’t receive Pell Grants, and at private schools, 91% of Pell recipients take on debt (60% of those without Pell Grants took out loans in order to graduate from a private school).

3. Black and low-income students are most likely to finance an associate’s degree.

Less than half (42%) of associate’s-degree earners take out student loans. If they do, it’s more likely they are black and have received need-based aid: 57% of black students who graduate with associate’s degrees have student loans, and 55% of Pell recipients have student loans from two-year degrees. Those students also take on more debt than other people with associate’s degrees.

4. A lot of education debt among Latino and black students comes from for-profit education.

If you attend a for-profit college, it’s highly likely you need student loans to do so: 86% of white students, 89% of Latino students and 90% of black students take out loans to get a bachelor’s degree from a for-profit college. The fact that blacks and Latinos make up a significant portion of the for-profit student population intensifies the debt inequality. Nationwide, black and Latino students account for 29% of college students, but they make up 45% of the for-profit student body.

5. Dropout rates are higher among poor students and black students.

While taking on a lot of debt to earn a degree has its negative repercussions, those people generally reap the benefits of having a college education, which helps with the high debt load. Most people who default on student loans are those who never got their degrees, meaning they have to try to tackle their loan payments without the benefit of higher earning potential. Not only are white and high-income students dealing with statistically lower debt loads, they’re also most likely to graduate.

On the other end of the spectrum, there are black and low-income students who take on the most student loan debt, and they’re least likely to earn a degree with it. Thirty-nine percent of black student borrowers drop out (according to 2009 data), compared to 31% of Latino borrowers and 29% of white borrowers. The greatest gap comes from where the students start financially: Those who are at 200% or less of the poverty line are much more likely to drop out (38% did), while those with family income more than twice the poverty level had a lower dropout rate of 23%.

Student loan debt is a concern among most people these days, but it’s far more burdensome for some groups. When taken on in affordable amounts and managed well, student loans can be a great investment in your future, and repayment can help you establish a good credit history. However, because loan payments can soak up a significant amount of borrowers’ resources, student loan debt can make the many years after graduation less financially productive. Because student loans are rarely dischargeable in bankruptcy, they need to be a top priority if borrowers hope to achieve financial stability and a good credit standing (you can see where your credit scores stand for free on Credit.com). As the statistics show, that’s a lot easier for some consumers than for others.

More on Student Loans:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • heavyw8t

    Some of those stats seem to be nothing more than a logical progression of financial status. If a specific group needs loans and grants to get through college, it is logical to assume that they needed the assistance because they have no money. If they never had money, they could never have learned how to handle money. Thus when they complete their education and begin to live life, they get credit cards and abuse them because they never had the opportunity to learn how to responsibly live with credit. I don’t find a lot of these statistics all that remarkable.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team