Home > Mortgages > A Bad Habit From the Real Estate Bubble Resurfaces

Comments 0 Comments

During the heyday of the housing bubble, mortgage sellers made a killing via kickbacks. They often got bonuses for steering borrowers toward more expensive mortgages.

Financial reform, including a strict rule that took effect in 2011 from the Federal Reserve known as the “Compensation Rule,” banned the practice of giving mortgage brokers or loan officers financial incentives for pushing higher-rate loans on consumers. But some mortgage sellers are reportedly still engaging in this practice.

The latest examples come from two lawsuits recently filed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

In the first, California-based RPM Mortgage – which at one time operated in 18 states — was accused of disguising higher-rate loan bonuses via an employee expense account.

“RPM deposited profits from an officer’s closed loans – profits that were a direct product of the loans’ interest rates – into the loan officer’s employee-expense account, and then used it to pay her bonuses and increased commissions,” the CFPB alleged.

The expense account structure was put into place in 2011 as a direct reaction to the Compensation Rule, which outlawed RPM’s old bonus structure, the CFPB said. More than 500 bonuses were paid out from the expense account, the CFPB says.

To settle the allegations without admitting any wrongdoing, RPM has agreed to repay consumers $18 million and pay $2 million in penalties.

In a press release, RPM said it cooperated fully with the CFPB investigation. “The company has always taken great care to provide outstanding service and highly competitive rates while complying with the rules governing loan originator compensation, despite the limited and sometimes confusing guidance provided by regulators,” said RPM CEO, Rob Hirt.

In the second case, California-based Guarantee Mortgage Corp. was accused of funneling additional compensation to branch managers and loan originators through third-party marketing service firms.

“The owners of the marketing-services entities … drew the monthly fees as additional compensation. Marketing-services-entity owners included Producing Branch Managers as well as, in some instances, one or more other Loan Originators within the branch,” the complaint alleges. “Owners of marketing services entities received compensation based on the terms of loans they had originated.”

Guarantee, which is no longer operating, was ordered to pay a civil penalty of $228,000, according to the CFPB.

Giving bonuses to sales staff who get more money out of consumers is hardly a new practice. In fact, even the CFPB concedes that in a perfect world, such payments would be regulated by market forces.

“In a perfectly competitive and transparent market, competition would ensure that this incentive would be countered by the need to compete with other loan originators to offer attractive loan terms to consumers,” the agency says in its Loan Origination rule.

But the mortgage market is rarely transparent, particularly when consumers obtain home loans only a few times in their lives. In their most notorious form, financial incentives for loan officers and brokers can be particularly confusing or unclear to consumers. Before financial reform, mortgage brokers were allowed to “double-dip” — receiving payment from consumers in the form of closing costs as well as from banks in the form of “yield-spread premiums” earned by steering consumers into higher-cost loans. That practice is now banned.

However, the recent lawsuits show that it’s still important for consumers to protect themselves when obtaining a mortgage. The best way to do that is to shop around. Always get at least three bids — for now, Good Faith Estimates — from a mixture of lenders and brokers. (New forms simply called “Loan Estimates” will take effect Aug. 1.) An apples-to-apples comparison of bottom-line costs is the best way to make sure there aren’t hidden costs in your mortgage. Maybe the mortgage market can never be perfectly transparent – but vigilantly shopping around can help make the process more so for a consumer.

And before you shop around, make sure you know where you stand — how much house you can afford, what your down payment will be and where your credit score lies. (You can check your credit scores for free on Credit.com.)

More on Mortgages & Homebuying:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team