Home > Mortgages > Is a Biweekly Mortgage Payment a Bad Idea?

Comments 0 Comments

Biweekly mortgage payments certainly sound like a great idea. Paying half your mortgage every two weeks instead of a full payment once each month actually can save you many thousands of dollars over the life of a mortgage, and allow you to cut years off that 30-year loan. Sadly, as with many financial instruments that sound great, there’s a catch. In fact, there are many. A lawsuit filed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau this week against a firm selling biweekly mortgage payment programs highlights all the reasons that signing up for biweekly mortgage could be a very bad idea.

The CFPB sued Nationwide Biweekly Administration for selling a product the firm called “Interest Minimizer” that the CFPB says deceived many consumers, who ended up paying more in fees than they got back in interest savings.

But first, let’s get this out of the way. Conceptually, biweekly mortgages can work. Pay half a month’s mortgage every two weeks and you’ll make one full extra mortgage payment every year. Early payments lower your principal, which lowers your compound interest, so they have a virtuous impact. Here’s the key: You can make early mortgage payments yourself anytime. You do need to stay on top of your mortgage servicer and make sure the extra payments are applied correctly to your principal, but if you are the kind of person who makes extra mortgage payments, you are probably the kind of person who can stay on top of how those payments are applied.

Why You Might Not Want to Pay Early

You don’t need to pay a third party to manage biweekly payments for you. Some folks feel like signing an agreement ensures they’ll keep up with what amounts to a forced savings plan; that’s a personal choice. But know there’s a cheaper way to do it.

There are other reasons not to commit to a biweekly mortgage. It’s always good to maintain flexibility in case something unexpected occurs, such as a medical emergency. And while paying down a mortgage can feel good, it actually isn’t the slam-dunk financial choice many black-and-white financial advisers say it is. Huh? Here’s just one example: If you have a mortgage at 3.5%, you are going to miss it, and the cash you used to prepay it if — as many experts predict — interest rates on savings accounts soar past 3.5% during the next decade or so.

Back to biweekly payments, and things that can go wrong. The CFPB alleges that Nationwide Biweekly Administration and its owner Daniel Lipsky misrepresented the savings consumers enjoy from their biweekly program. In short, because of set-up fees and ongoing fees, consumers with a typical 30-year mortgage must make nine years of payments before they break even with the program. The CFPB says only 25% of all enrollees at the end of 2014 had even made four years’ worth of payments.

Meanwhile, Nationwide collected $49 million from consumers between 2011 and 2014.

Nationwide’s set-up fee is $995, and ongoing annual fees range from $84-$101. Scripts for nationwide sales representatives are designed to obfuscate the cost, the CFPB says; sales reps are also told to give homeowners the impression that Nationwide is affiliated with their mortgage company, also a deception, according to the CFPB.

“The defendants know that consumers will pay more in fees than they save in interest for the first several years in the program, and that many consumers will leave the program without saving any money at all,” the CFPB says.

Credit.com reached out to Nationwide Biweekly Administration for comment, but did not receive a response by press time. Lipsky denied the CFPB allegations, according to Cleveland.com.

“(Nationwide) recently analyzed their 100 oldest active customers and found that to mid-April 2015, they had saved a combined $3.5 million in interest charges with only a combined $128,000 in fees. This equates to about $27 in interest savings for every $1 in fees, a 2,700% return,” Lipsky said.

The firm also helps borrowers find bank errors in their mortgages, he said.

There is no dispute, however, that this logic holds true for every financial instrument: the higher the fees, the more the consumer benefit evaporates.

How You Can Do It Yourself

Biweekly mortgage programs with set-up fees and ongoing costs turn what could be a good idea into a bad one. The odds you’ll stay in your current home, paying your current mortgage for the next 10 years, are quite low.

So prepay your mortgage if you like. But do it on your schedule. Make it easy on yourself — divide your monthly payment by 12, and add that amount to every monthly mortgage payment you send. That will work almost as well as biweekly payments, and it’s free.

But do it only with money you absolutely, positively, unequivocally know you won’t need for another 20 or 30 years. Having a large emergency savings account, and cash piled up to buy a new car or other big purchase, should be higher priority than prepaying your mortgage. Why? Should an emergency arrive, you’ll never be able to borrow money at current mortgage-interest rates. Missing a mortgage payment because you can’t keep up with a biweekly payment schedule is never a good idea, since it can have a serious negative impact on your credit. You can get a free credit report summary every month on Credit.com to see how your payments are impacting your scores.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its partners.

More on Mortgages:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team