Home > Students > When Your College ID Is Also Your Debit Card, Beware of the Fees

Comments 0 Comments

Many college students are losing hundreds of dollars of their student loan funds to debit card overdraft fees, a new report on school-offered debit cards concludes. The Center for Responsible Lending analyzed exclusive debit card partnerships between several large universities and banks to see how these products affect students, and the findings suggest students might be better off getting banking services elsewhere.

Despite the fact that students can choose other options to receive their student loan disbursements (what’s left over of their loans after the school has taken what it needs for tuition and fees), between 70% and 80% of students opt for co-branded debit cards, the report says. The cards often double as a student ID, and they’re marketed as a way to make a student’s life a little simpler.

That simplicity has a price tag. Based on the overdrafting habits of 18- to 25-year-olds, nearly 40% of students with debit cards offered jointly by their university and a bank will incur an average of $67 to $710 in annual overdraft fees, depending on how often they spend more than they have in their accounts. In some cases, overdraft fees can exceed $100 a day.

Consumers 25 years old and younger are at particularly high risk of overdrafting their checking accounts, because they are least familiar with the banking instruments and tend to have lower account balances than people older than they are, according to research by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Among 18- to 25-year-olds, nearly two in five (38%) overdraft their accounts, and 11% do it more than 11 times per year.

Schools and partner banks say part of the reason to offer these debit cards is to give banking access to students who couldn’t otherwise acquire it, presumably forcing them to use costly check-cashing services to get their student loan disbursements. The report points to a survey that says less than 1% of college students have a poor banking history that would prevent them from getting a checking account (compare that to the 70% to 80% student card adoption rate). While most students have many options for banking services, the ones offered by their schools may seem most appealing.

With the co-branded debit cards offered by many universities and banks, that 11% of students who overdraft at least 11 times a year pay an average of $710 in overdraft fees annually. That’s more than half of what a student needs to pay for an average year of textbook costs ($1,200, according to the College Board). The Center for Responsible Lending’s research found that these accounts are just as costly, if not more costly, than checking accounts students could get at other banks.

Meanwhile, those hundreds of dollars going toward fees are accruing interest, because it’s student loan money. Overdraft fees may end up costing students thousands of dollars by the time they repay their loans.

All-in-one ID/debit cards may be a great option for a student looking to open a bank account, but it’s important to know how much a product might cost you — that’s true of all bank accounts and credit instruments. Do your research, understand the account terms and avoid costly habits (like overdrafting or using out-of-network ATMs) if at all possible.

More on Student Loans:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team