Home > Students > Obama’s Student Loan Bill of Rights: Will It Fix Anything?

Comments 2 Comments

President Obama issued an executive memorandum Tuesday to the Department of Education and other federal agencies to do more to help student loan borrowers afford their debt payments. He’s calling it the Student Aid Bill of Rights.

It addresses some big issues, like making payments more affordable and giving borrowers a simple way to provide feedback on their loan experiences. However, experts say that these rights only cover some of the problems borrowers encounter, and that it will take time to see how this executive action plays out for student loan borrowers.

“These things aren’t going to immediately improve the economic drag that student loan debt has on the economy,” said Chris Lindstrom, higher education program director at U.S. Public Interest Research Group (PIRG). “There’s any number of outstanding questions that are definitely not spelled out in detail … but we’re optimistic that we can at least follow through on a set of these things and make them happen before the president leaves office.”

With that in mind, here are the main points outlined in this bill of rights (note: despite the use of the word bill, this is not legislation).

A Student Aid Bill of Rights

I. Every student deserves access to a quality, affordable education at a college that’s cutting costs and increasing learning.
II. Every student should be able to access the resources needed to pay for college.
III. Every borrower has the right to an affordable repayment plan.
IV. And every borrower has the right to quality customer service, reliable information, and fair treatment, even if they struggle to repay their loans.

This presidential memo also says the Department of Education will now be responsible for making sure servicers apply overpayments to the loan with the highest interest rate, therefore relieving borrowers of that burden. Currently, there’s no way for borrowers to refinance through the federal student loan program, and the only workaround to pay less interest in the long run is to make more than your minimum monthly payment and request your servicer apply that payment to your highest interest rate loan. However, borrowers have reportedly complained that servicers don’t always follow those instructions.

These changes are generally focused on making things easier for borrowers to understand and increasing access to resources to answer any questions they may have. For example, there’s a directive that the Education Department create a centralized platform for borrowers to access their loan information and make payments.

“That’s a fancy way of saying we’re bypassing the servicers,” said Joshua Cohen, a student loan lawyer based in Vermont. “I think people will love that because people do not like dealing with servicers.”

It’s a common borrower complaint — that servicers don’t communicate well with borrowers, and don’t follow borrowers’ instructions — and the memorandum calls for a better way to collect and address consumer complaints about them.

“I think it’s really encouraging to see a push for a more standardized servicing experience,” said Jesse O’Connell, assistant director of federal relations for the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators. Because borrowers don’t have a choice in what entity services their loans, borrowers often feel stuck with a servicer that isn’t meeting their needs. O’Connell said that’s an inequity that can harm individuals and, by extension, the greater economy. “We want to make sure all students are getting a consistently high level of service.”

Borrower advocates are optimistic in light of this executive action, but still have many questions there are about how this order will be executed. Cohen, for one, would like to see more efforts aimed at reducing the cost of college (there’s a section of the memo about increasing grants to encourage schools to cut expenses), in addition to tackling private student loan affordability.

Even though private student loans only make up 13.75% of the $1.2 trillion in outstanding loan debt, that small percentage translates into a large dollar amount — about $165 billion.

“This is great for federal loans, but there’s still no regulation of private loans,” Cohen said. “It would be nice if he had addressed the banking institutions or banking regulations.”

More on Student Loans:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Jimmy Jack

    Yeah, the government to the rescue. What could go wrong?

  • Anon Person

    OK so JUST WHAT is this going to do? The explanation is pretty vague – No substance!

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team