Home > 2015 > Personal Finance

Does a Lower Loan Payment Come at a Big Cost?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 1 Comment

Are we looking at yet another consumer bubble?

The stock market is up, inflation is down, and although wages have not yet returned to their pre-crash levels, household incomes are beginning to gain ground. So when the Federal Reserve Bank of New York recently reported a $117 billion increase in aggregate household indebtedness, some viewed the news as a harbinger of mounting consumer confidence.

Considering the latest payment performance data for all types of consumer debt, however, I’m not so sure that’s the case.

Take for instance Freddie Mac, the bailed-out funding source for mortgage loans originated by banks and thrifts. For the second time, the government-sponsored agency has directed its subcontracted servicers to be quick about modifying the mortgages it had previously restructured under the Home Affordable Modification Program. Freddie is worried that rising interest rates will compromise the loans that are due to be resetting soon. Its Fannie Mae twin is expected to follow suit.

Auto loans and student loans have also suddenly grown more unstable. According to the same FRBNY report, newly serious delinquencies—remittances that are 90 or more days past due—have markedly increased for these debt categories. Credit card defaults are on the uptick as well.

If wages are rising—albeit slowly—and inflation is increasing at about half that pace, why are consumers having trouble keeping up with the payments on their loans?

Perhaps the answer has something to do with the dark side of finance: Creative payment structuring that’s used to “help” consumers get what they want (or are led to believe that they want).

Here are a couple of examples…

Adjustable-Rate Mortgages

Did you know that the adjustable-rate mortgage was designed to save money for banks and reduce institutional risk, too? Let’s start with an acknowledgment that there’s no such thing as a “fixed rate” in a dynamic market.

There are, however, financial institutions that are willing to gamble on the direction in which interest rates are headed over time and price their loans accordingly. Others hedge their bets by finding partners that are willing to guarantee a longer-term rate in exchange for fees. Either way, the borrower pays extra for that financial certainty.

Variable-rate loans are typically priced at a discount to fixed-rate loans because the interest-rate risk is shifted to the borrower. In a perfect world, the difference between fixed and variable rate loans would be the value of the forgone cost of the hedge. But we don’t live in a perfect world, do we?

The dark side comes into play when ARMs are used by sellers and their agents to induce otherwise reluctant purchasers to pay more for real estate than they planned. For example, a 4% fixed-rate, 30-year mortgage for $200,000 will cost $955 per month. At 3%, that same monthly payment will finance $26,475 more house—twice that amount if the mortgage is written for $400,000.

If, at a time when interest rates are at historic lows, you still need a variable-rate mortgage to make the math behind your deal work, something’s wrong with your deal. The better way to go is to resist the temptation to cash-flow engineer a desired outcome with an ARM by making your fundamental decision on the basis of conventional (fixed-rate) financing. Even if you’re counting on selling your home before the first reset, recent history tells us that nothing is for sure.

Extending Repayment Durations

Auto lenders have begun offering seven-year financing. But is the motivation behind these longer-term loans to improve affordability, or is it to sell a costlier product? A four-year, $20,000 car loan at 7% interest would run $479 per month. That same payment would buy $11,732 more car if the loan duration was stretched to seven years.

If you plan on owning your car until it disintegrates and don’t mind paying lots of interest over a protracted period, knock yourself out. But if you intend to trade or sell that car before your loan comes to term, you could find yourself underwater, where the value of your car is worth less than the loan you’ll have to pay off in order to sell it. And although you may find a dealer or lender that’s willing to roll that shortfall into a new loan or lease, know that you’ll only making matters tougher on yourself for the next go-round.

Look, consumers have become conditioned to using financing for their big-ticket purchases. The key is to be as hard-nosed and disciplined about negotiating loan structures as you are about the prices of what you plan on purchasing. If you can’t make it work without taking undue interest rate or term (loan duration) risk, it’s time to rethink your decision.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its affiliates.

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: Hemera

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://www.alexlogic.com/ AlessandroMachi

    While I agree that creative financing is the root cause behind the fake economic recovery, I don’t agree with your car loan conclusion. The average age of an american car is somewhere between 10 to 12 years, so a 7 year loan seems irrelevant since buying 11,000 dollars more car instead simply equals more depreciation.
    I think it’s all about creating “deals” that prevent consumers from paying their high interest rate debts paid off.
    Take out a HELOC? Well, it may take a few years, maybe several years to figure out how the HELOC is going to be used, but suddenly the 10 year reset arrives, the payment basically increases by an additional 200% above what it was, and guess what suddenly can’t be paid down, the higher interest rate credit cards.
    Now throw in student loans.
    Now throw in all the court judgements against consumers that don’t get factored in any economic data.
    If a consumer has to spend 10% of their spendable income to simply “maintain” the debt on their credit cards and student loans, then it would take 25% of a consumer’s monthly income to actually pay those debts down and eventually pay them off.
    The high interest rate credit card debt is the lifeblood of the rich elite and they won’t give it up.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team