Home > Personal Finance > Do I Have to File Income Taxes?

Comments 0 Comments

If you think the Internal Revenue Service expects to hear from everybody this time of year, here’s a quote that might surprise you. It’s from an IRS spokesperson I’ve interviewed many times, Mike Dobzinski.

“We get quite a few returns that come in that really don’t have to be filed. If we can discern from what you filed that you’re not required, then we’ll send you back a letter saying that you really don’t have to file a tax return again.”

That’s right: depending on your age, income and filing status, income tax filing is one stressful situation you might be able to avoid. However, if that’s true, you may have stress of a different kind. Because one reason you might not have to file is that you are barely getting by.

And that brings us to this week’s question:

For the last three years we have had our tax returns done for us by AARP volunteers at our senior center. They told us that we did not have to file because of our low income. I have been worried about not filing and would like your opinion on this. I hope they are correct and, if not, what should we do? Thanks!
– David

Who Doesn’t Have to File a Tax Return?

Income cutoffs for filing tax returns change every year with inflation. Here’s a table summarizing the income thresholds for tax year 2014, assembled from this page of the IRS website.

Income Tax Table

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depending on the level listed on this chart, he probably got good advice from the AARP volunteers at his senior center. Note, however, these rules are rife with exceptions; for example, if you’re claimed as a dependent on someone else’s return, you have to file at much lower income levels. You can check that out here.

But while it may sound crazy, there are situations where you’ll want to file even if you don’t have to.

Who Should File Anyway

You might want to file a tax return when the law doesn’t require it. Why? To reclaim money withheld for taxes, or when you qualify for a refundable tax credit, in other words, money Uncle Sam offers that you can claim even if you didn’t pay any money in.

Here are a couple of common situations when filing could get you money back.

  1. You had federal income tax withheld. If you had money withheld for taxes and don’t owe taxes, you should obviously file a return so you can get a refund. This also applies if you made estimated tax payments or received overpayment from a prior year applied to this year.
  2. You qualify for the Earned Income Tax Credit. You might be eligible for EITC if you worked but didn’t make much. The credit can be up to $6,143 for married couples with three children and adjusted gross incomes of up to $52,427. The credit is refundable, meaning even if you don’t owe or didn’t pay taxes, you can still get a refund check.

Since he’s retired, David probably won’t qualify for the EITC, but he can quickly find out by going to this page of the IRS website.

When in Doubt, File

If your 2014 income was less than $53,000, it won’t cost you a dime to get professional help to electronically file a tax return. (See 8 Ways to Get Free Help Preparing Your Taxes.) And if you’re required to file and don’t, you could be setting yourself up for penalties and interest. So when it doubt, file.

If you file and weren’t required to, the IRS will simply send you a letter saying you don’t have to bother anymore.

Before leaving the topic of people who don’t have to file, let’s explore an additional category of non-filers: people who think they shouldn’t have to file because there’s no law on the books requiring them to.

Does the Constitution Require You to File Income Taxes?

In 1996, while working out of a Fox newsroom in Cincinnati, I approached the IRS for a comment about people who refused to pay income taxes based on the belief Uncle Sam wasn’t legally authorized to collect them.

When I phoned in my interview request, the IRS spokesperson practically bit my head off. To paraphrase, she said this was a stupid topic, they had discussed it a million times and would no longer even dignify it with a response. She added the government had every right to collect taxes, those who didn’t pay their taxes would lose in court and risk jail time, and anyone suggesting otherwise is either a con artist, a moron or both.

While her tone and words may not have been entirely this scathing, they were close.

Fast forward 20 years; the tax protest movement lives on. There’s a website called PayNoIncomeTax.com, ironically authored by someone in prison for tax evasion. There’s a Wikipedia page explaining the tax protester movement. There are articles in respected publications like Forbes asking Are Tax Protesters Actually Winning? (Spoiler alert: No, they’re not winning. And they are paying huge penalties.)

This taxes-are-illegal legend that refuses to die has apparently been around since the 1950s. It’s so pervasive, the IRS has published and periodically updates a useful guide, The Truth About Frivolous Tax Arguments. It offers specific court cases disproving these and other common tax protester arguments:

1. Contention: The filing of a tax return is voluntary. Some taxpayers assert that they are not required to file federal tax returns because the filing of a tax return is voluntary.

2. Contention: Payment of federal income tax is voluntary. In a similar vein, some argue that they are not required to pay federal taxes because the payment of federal taxes is voluntary. Proponents of this position argue that our system of taxation is based upon voluntary assessment and payment.

3. Contention: Taxpayers can reduce their federal income tax liability by filing a “zero return.” Some taxpayers attempt to reduce their federal income tax liability by filing a tax return that reports no income and no tax liability (a “zero return”) even though they have taxable income.

4. Contention: The IRS must prepare federal tax returns for a person who fails to file.Proponents of this argument contend that section 6020(b) obligates the IRS to prepare and sign under penalties of perjury a federal tax return for a person who does not file a return. Thus, those who subscribe to this contention claim that they are not required to file a return for themselves.

5. Contention: Compliance with an administrative summons issued by the IRS is voluntary. Some summoned parties may assert that they are not required to respond to or comply with an administrative summons issued by the IRS.

Each of these contentions is proven false, not by logic, but court cases, each of which landed the protester in hot water or worse.

Bottom line? Seemingly logical arguments against paying income taxes are exactly the type of thing Internet nut cases love to sink their teeth into. Don’t bite. Their arguments are old, specious, and, most importantly, they won’t hold up in court.

This post originally appeared on Money Talks News.

More from Money Talks News:

Image: Wavebreakmedia Ltd

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team