Home > Mortgages > 10 Home Upgrades That May Not Be Worth It

Comments 0 Comments

The economy is reviving, and so is our appetite for spending on home improvements. By 2014, remodeling had nearly returned to the levels of early 2007, when the housing market hit a peak, according to researchers at Hanley Wood, publisher of Remodeling Magazine. They expect remodeling to grow 4% more in 2015.

Today is different, though: When you sell a home, you can’t recover as much of your remodeling costs as you could then. Remodeling Magazine blames today’s “tepid housing market and rising job costs.”

Home remodeling rarely earns a profit, anyway. But, today’s return on investment of 62.2% is low. ROI for remodeling reached a high of 86.7% in 2005, according to the magazine’s 2015 Cost vs Value report. It fell to 57.7% in 2011-2012 and has been making a wobbly recovery since.

Remodeling Is Recovering, Payback Is Not

The Cost vs Value report each year identifies remodeling projects with the best and worst ROI. The magazine collects data on costs, sale prices and desirability of home features from building and real-estate professionals. It looks at both midrange projects and upscale ones, those with a more expensive “scope of work, complexity and quality of finishes.”

If the “Property Brothers” have you lusting after high-end kitchens, and you’re telling yourself you’ll get the money back when you sell the house, the message from this report is: Get a grip. Upscale projects have some of the most-disappointing payoffs in Remodeling Magazine’s survey, including (No. 8) an upscale kitchen remodel.

This doesn’t mean don’t do it. It means that remodeling is consumption — spending for enjoyment on something whose value will diminish, not grow, like a TV or new shoes. (A really expensive pair of shoes.)

Your project’s return on investment might be better or worse than the national averages below. ROI depends a lot on where you live. Here are the report’s costs and returns by region and by city.

Remodeling Magazine’s 10 home improvements with the worst payoff in 2015 are:

1. Sunroom Addition

  • ROI: 48.5%
  • Cost: $75,726
  • Resale value: $36,704

This isn’t a sunroom kit but a fairly expensive 200-square-foot addition to the home’s footprint with a new roof and skylights, foundation, energy-efficient windows and automatic shades.

2. Home Office Remodel

  • ROI: 48.7%
  • Cost: $29,066
  • Resale value: $14,155

This project envisions transforming an existing 12-by-12-foot room into a home office with custom cabinets, a laminate desktop, wiring for electronics, drywall, paint and carpeting. It’s not a high-end job, but it’s expensive to do.

Realtors say that sinking money into a home office is a poor investment, generally, because many homebuyers would rather have flexible space to use for their own needs, such as a spare bedroom, game room, den, guest room, sewing room or nursery, for example.

3. (Upscale) Master Suite Addition

  • ROI: 53.7%
  • Cost: $236,363
  • Resale value: $126,860

Buyers may appreciate a project like this one, a 32-foot-by-20-foot addition filled with custom cabinets and bookcases, higher-end appliances, a walk-in closet and a hospitality center with bar sink, under-counter refrigerator, stone countertop and microwave. But they’re unlikely to pay top dollar for it.

Adding new space to a home involves costly excavation and foundation construction, points out HouseLogic, a National Association of Realtors’ site, which adds:

Payback on a master suite addition depends more on how it compares with other houses on the block. If your neighborhood is filled with empty nesters with two-bedroom houses, you probably won’t recoup your investment in a luxury master suite. But if master suites additions are common in your area, you’ll recoup more.

Instead of adding on, take advantage of existing space, if possible, by converting an attic or basement, for example. You’d save 20% to 60% on construction, increasing the rate of return for this project, HouseLogic says.

4. (Upscale) Garage Addition

  • ROI: 54.7%
  • Cost: $85,592
  • Resale value: $46,791

This aspirational garage is a finished addition to the home. The interior walls hold modular cabinets above and below, and the work surfaces are equipped with task lighting. Such customized improvements are expensive. Be prepared to enjoy them, but understand that your home’s buyers probably won’t pay anything near the full construction value for them.

5. (Midrange) Bathroom Addition

  • ROI: 57.8%
  • Cost: $39,578
  • Resale value: $22,875

This addition involves constructing a new 6-by-8-foot bathroom over a crawl space. The materials aren’t fancy — a fiberglass tub-shower with a tile surround, for example — but adding to a home’s footprint is expensive, as are the costs of new wiring, plumbing and bathroom appliances.

6. (Upscale) Bathroom Addition

  • ROI: 58.6%
  • Cost: $76,429
  • Resale value: $44,750

This project adds 100 square feet to the home, placing a new master bathroom over a crawl space. It’s a beautiful room, with ceramic-tiled walls, a sophisticated custom shower with body-spray fixtures, and a frameless glass enclosure, a custom whirlpool tub, dual-sink, stone countertop and a separate compartment for the toilet.

7. New (Upscale) Composite Deck

  • ROI: 58.9%
  • Cost: $36,385
  • Resale value: $21,437

Composite decking is growing in popularity and the material lasts longer. Popular Trex decking, for example, has a 25-year limited warranty. In comparison, a pressure-treated pine deck lasts around 15 years, says The Baltimore Sun, although diligent maintenance can extend its life.

Composite is low-maintenance, too, but it is by no means cheap, said Dave Lombardo, president of American Deck & Patio, in an interview with the Sun:

[C]onvincingly natural-looking composite decking can run the customer 2½ to seven times as much as pressure-treated pine. There’s also a higher installation cost, Lombardo says: “The installation cost delta varies from 15% to 45% based on contractor and amount and type of composites selected.”

Lombardo told readers to stick with four major composite brands — Trex, Fiberon, CPG [Azek and TimberTech], and EverGrain.

Desirable as composite deck products are, pressure-treated wood is more-affordable and earns a much better return — around 85%, on average, according to the report.

8. (Upscale) Major Kitchen Remodel

  • ROI: 59%
  • Cost: $113,097
  • Resale value: $66,747

Once again, the upscale remodel project is not a great investment. This project includes 35 linear feet of “top-of-the-line” custom cabinets in cherry, built-in appliances, a commercial-grade range, stone counters, lots of great lighting, a high-end sink, a new island and a cork floor trimmed in cherry. Sweet. And expensive.

“Appraisers and buyers rarely value top-of-the-line appliances at anything close to their purchase price,” writes The Washington Post.

Keep costs down when remodeling a kitchen by maintaining the room’s current footprint and configuration, The Post says. “Avoid moving plumbing and electrical items if possible — at least try to keep your stove (especially gas stoves) and sink in the same location.”

A less-expensive version of a full-scale kitchen remodel carries a better return — 67.8% — and costs $57,768, Remodeling Magazine says.

9. (Upscale) Bathroom Remodel

  • ROI: 59.8%
  • Cost: $54,115
  • Resale value: $32,385

When Angie’s List surveyed 1,000 professional remodelers in 2014, they said bathroom remodels are the most popular home improvement today. This project adds nothing to the home’s footprint but uses existing space to expand a 35-square-foot bathroom to 100 square feet. It’s an upscale job, and, like the upscale bathroom addition, it uses pricier and finer fixtures, appliances and finishes.

A lower-end version of the bathroom remodel pays back much better, at 70%, the report found.

10. Backup Generator

  • ROI: 59.9%
  • Cost: $12,135
  • Resale value: $7,263

Backup generators aren’t sexy. When homeowners splurge, they prefer spending on home theaters and kitchen upgrades. You will appreciate a generator when it’s needed most, but it’s hard to spend money on one when you don’t.

This post originally appeared on Money Talks News.

More from Money Talks News:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team