Home > Managing Debt > Debt Collector Now Owes $33K to Woman Harassed Over $350 Debt

Comments 0 Comments

In what some people might find a satisfying turn of the tables, a debt collector has been ordered to pay a debtor $33,000 for harassing the woman over $350 of late payments on a used car, ABC News’ “20/20” reports.

Jessica Burke sued the collector, who operates under the pseudonym John Anderson, for violating her privacy rights and using abusive collection tactics, which are prohibited under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. According to the “20/20” report, Anderson didn’t show up to court, and a judge issued a $33,000 judgment against him on June 29, 2009.

Burke said she received at least 15 text messages a day, and even after she returned her car to the finance company, the collection calls didn’t stop. She had repaid her debt, she said, but the ordeal continued.

There’s a lot of he-said, she-said in this story: Anderson told “20/20” he never sent harassing text messages, claiming it was the collector with the financing company. Anderson said he got mad after Burke got in a “physical altercation” with a woman he sent to repossess the car, which Burke denied to “20/20”. Burke said the collector claimed to have told her employer about the debt and knew the names of her co-workers.

“I can’t tell you how many times I told him to stop,” Burke told the show. “There were times where I was crying on the phone, begging him to stop.”

Burke may have won the lawsuit, but Anderson told “20/20” he’ll never pay her. (That doesn’t change the high likelihood that the judgment will severely damage his credit score.) Burke doesn’t seem too bothered by that, saying she won’t chase him over the money, because she can move on without being bothered.

The case could theoretically go in some interesting directions, even though it seems both parties are uninterested in continuing the struggle. Burke could probably hire a debt collector to go after Anderson, which is entertaining in its irony, at the very least. Anderson is presumably an experienced debt buyer and could probably get that $33,000 judgment for much less than it’s worth, though it seems unlikely whoever owns his debt would want to sell it to him.

The whole thing is a little bizarre, particularly when you think about how $350 in overdue payments ended up in a $33,000 judgment for the collector. Breaking the law to go after $350 hardly seems worthwhile, though there are plenty of stories of collectors violating the FDCPA. Still, debt-collection horror stories like this aren’t the norm. More than anything, it’s important for consumers to understand their rights when dealing with collectors, so rogue collectors can be brought to justice and consumers can make the collection account as manageable as possible.

If you want to make sure you don’t have any collection accounts in your name, you can check your credit reports for free once a year under federal law. You may also want to monitor your credit scores on a regular basis. A major, unexpected drop in your scores could signal a collection account hitting your credit file. You can check two of your credit scores for free every month on Credit.com.

More on Identity Theft:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team