Home > Identity Theft > US Postal Service Suffers Data Breach

Comments 0 Comments

Employee databases, full of sensitive personal information, are a treasure trove for hackers, and the U.S. Postal service on Monday became the latest employer that’s had to deliver bad news about that data to its workers. Computer criminals potentially compromised critical employee data from the USPS, the agency said, including “names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, addresses, beginning and end dates of employment, emergency contact information and other information.”

Human resource data is a frequent target of identify thieves. The hack also impacted some consumers who called in to the USPS customer care center earlier this year — hackers obtained their names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses — but postal service officials say those consumers are not at increased risk for identity theft.

USPS workers will get a free year of credit monitoring to help ward off identity theft trouble, but in a disturbing twist, sources told the Washington Post that the hackers don’t seem interested in making money using the stolen information. Instead, the Post says hackers from China are responsible for the attack, and their goal seems to be state sponsored cyber-espionage.

While the attack is said to have occurred in mid-October, it was revealed Monday, the day that President Obama arrived in Beijing for talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Experts said rosters of U.S. employees would be useful to foreign intelligence agencies. While the USPS is not a government entity, it performs some government-like functions.

U.S. officials say hackers have targeted federal employees before. In August, U.S. officials said computer systems belonging to USIS, a federal contractor that conducts background checks on federal workers, had been compromised. Records of some 25,000 Department of Homeland Security workers were compromised in what was called a “state-sponsored attack.”

And in July, the New York Times revealed that U.S. officials blamed Chinese hackers for an intrusion into Office of Personnel Management computers, which store data on federal workers, targeting “tens of thousands of employees who have applied for top-secret security clearances.”

Chinese officials have repeatedly denied responsibility for such attacks, though it’s widely believed that both the U.S. and Chinese governments wrestle frequently in cyberspace.

There is little for consumers to do in light of the USPS attack, other than those who called for customer support last year. Those consumers should beware of phishing attacks targeting the email addresses they shared with postal workers.

Employees who work for a firm that loses employee data should take breach notifications they receive seriously. Human resource databases can contain very personal information, such as data on healthcare providers and even vacation days, making victims of employee database theft particularly vulnerable to serious identity theft incidents. Workers should take full advantage of free credit monitoring offers, including more-frequent-than-usual inspection of their credit reports. Sudden large changes in credit scores can also be an indicator of fraud, and is a good reason to check your credit reports for more details on what caused the change. (And one way to see your credit scores for free is on Credit.com.)

Employees should also carefully check their annual Social Security Administration benefits statements for unusual activity. And they should be wary of any unusual snail mail suggesting their identity has been used to obtain credit, licenses, or to open any other accounts using their information.

More on Identity Theft:

Image: By IFCAR, via Wikimedia Commons

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team