Home > Personal Finance > Prepaid Cards May Be Getting More Consumer-Friendly

Comments 0 Comments

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau proposed regulations Thursday that would make prepaid debit cards safer to use and easier for consumers to understand. People who use prepaid cards often use them as an alternative to checking accounts, debit cards or credit cards, but those products offer much better consumer protections than prepaid cards.

For example, under the proposed regulations, if a prepaid card got lost or stolen, the consumer wouldn’t be responsible for more than $50 of unauthorized transactions — if they report the loss soon after learning of it. As things are now, prepaid card holders aren’t guaranteed those protections, though credit and debit card users are. (To be clear, credit and debit cards have different consumer protections, though there have been legislative efforts to make them comparable.)

There are two areas pertaining to prepaid cards the CFPB is targeting with these proposals: consumer protection and consumer education. These products often carry a variety of fees and don’t come with regular statements, making them difficult for customers to use confidently and properly.

The CFPB has three proposals concerning prepaid card protections. First, card issuers would be required to make regular statements or online summaries of card activity easily accessible to cardholders, free of charge. Second, financial institutions would be required to investigate errors reported by cardholders. The third proposal requires card issuers to cover unauthorized card activity in excess of $50, as long as the fraud is promptly reported. These protections would be available only if the cardholder has a registered account with the issuer.

The other two proposals concern a cardholder’s understanding of the product they use. There is no standard for prepaid card disclosures, not only making it difficult for consumers to comparison shop but also making it a challenge for consumers to understand the consequences of using the cards.

The CFPB proposes two forms — a long and short version —that would “concisely and clearly” explain account information, particularly the many kinds of fees often associated with prepaid cards. For people considering prepaid cards, they should be able to compare terms among different products, so the CFPB proposes requiring financial institutions to post prepaid card agreements on their websites for comparison shoppers to reference.

Prepaid cards offer conveniences like ATM withdrawals and online shopping, and even though they look like credit cards, they serve very different purposes. There are credit cards available for consumers with bad credit, as well as secured credit cards — both of which can help build a consumer’s credit, while a prepaid card cannot. (You can see where your credit scores stand for free on Credit.com.) However, for people who don’t want to use credit cards at all, used wisely, prepaid cards can be a good alternative to both credit cards and cash.

More on Credit Cards:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team