Home > 2014 > Mortgages

How Lying About Your Income Can Hurt Your Mortgage

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

Your income is one of the major factors lenders use in determining whether you qualify for a mortgage. Which is why omitting, hiding, manipulating or not showing income may put you in a decidedly gray area with your mortgage company.

When you apply for a home loan, lenders require specific income documentation to fund a mortgage, including:

  • Income tax returns for the two most recent years, with accompanying W-2s
  • Corporate tax returns for the two most recent years if self-employed
  • 30-day pay stub history

One exception to this rule is when completing a government loan streamline refinance or a HARP 2 refinance. For those, no income documentation may be required.

But there are some circumstances in which you might decide to omit your income from your mortgage application. Here are a few scenarios where you can get into sticky territory when trying to get a mortgage.

The Self-Employed Borrower

There is no getting around the lending requirement to show two years of tax returns — including corporate returns when applicable. Today’s federal lending requirements prevent a lender from cherry-picking which income years to use for qualifying. For example, if your 2013 income year was strong, but 2012 income year was very low, the lender cannot simply just ignore the 2012 income, as they must calculate a 24-month average of your income. So the lower income will, of course, lower your average.

Furthermore, if you are an employee of your own company, you’re still considered self-employed. Why? You control and set your own income, unlike a traditional employee who does not have an ownership interest in the company. In this case, you’ll still need to submit all the required documentation.

Non-Disclosed Income

The first question a prudent lender would ask is: Why are you trying to hide your income? Most of the time when the situation arises, it is because showing full income will make the lending scenario worse in trying to qualify. For example, if you’re receiving income you don’t disclose on your tax returns and you don’t pay taxes on, but you’re otherwise obligated to do so, you have bigger problems (as the IRS is particularly on the lookout for tax fraud). Simply put, it’s best to give your lender all material information regarding your income. Doing so allows them to help you get a mortgage.

Side Jobs & Cash Deposits

If you’re putting cash deposits independent of your normal income into your bank account and you don’t document it with your application, you could throw a big wrench in your mortgage process. This is true whether it’s a regular side income or not. If you’re applying for government financing, all cash deposits must be documented and sourced, meaning you’ll need to explain the origin of the funds. For conventional loan financing, lenders must source and document cash deposits that are 20% or more of your monthly income.

The Stronger Candidate

If two people apply for a mortgage, there may be a consideration made for whichever borrower has a stronger chance of qualifying. That applicant is usually the one most suited for the lender to review for loan approval. For a conventional mortgage loan, if one borrower’s financial information is not as strong as the other’s, the stronger borrower’s credit, debt, income and asset history can be used on its own. This is not the case, however, for a government loan such as an FHA, VA or USDA loan where the debt of the spouse negatively impacts the primary borrower, whose income can’t be used on the loan if their credit score is not high enough. In that situation, the income is ignored, but the debt is not. (You can check your credit scores for free on Credit.com with your spouse or partner to see where you both stand.

USDA Quirk

There is a special consideration with a USDA loan. Unlike a conventional or an FHA loan, where you can cherry-pick which borrowers are included on the loan application, the USDA reviews total household income. For example, if one borrower generates $70,000 in annual income, and the spouse not on the loan generates another $40,000 in income, the total household income is $110,000 — exceeding USDA’s income threshold (which varies per county). This means the lender must count the other $40,000 income, whether this person is on the application or not.

Ultimately, lenders want to make loans to borrowers who can fully support the proposed mortgage payment. (You can take a preliminary look at how much house you can afford using this calculator.) Most mortgage companies will want your mortgage payment and other debt to be no more than 43% of your income, though in some cases they may allow up to 55%. So it’s important to be upfront with your lender about all sources of income from the beginning so they can help you navigate the mortgage process and become a homeowner.

More on Mortgages & Homebuying:

Image: Hemera

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team