Home > 2014 > Identity Theft

Couple Charged in $3M Home Depot Credit Card Fraud That Lasted 3 Years

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

A Canadian couple allegedly went on a home-renovation spending spree like you wouldn’t believe. Since 2011, the two are accused of spending more than $3 million on fraudulent Home Depot credit cards, according to a news release from the Toronto Police Service. You read that correctly: 3 years, $3 million, all at Home Depot.

The idea that someone can spend $3 million on fake credit cards at one retailer is mind-boggling, yet that is what authorities are alleging. Toronto police arrested Malika Irrighen, 56, and Md Sumin Reaz, 38, on Oct. 21, charging them with uttering a forged document, obtaining credit by false pretense over $5,000, fraud over $5,000 and possession of property obtained by crime over $5,000.

The police searched their home and seized two cars, among other things not described in the release, but it better have been a really nice house — what the heck else would they have done with $3 million of Home Depot products?

The scheme seems to have gone down like this: Between May 2011 and August 2014, Irrighen and Reaz allegedly applied online for more than 100 Home Depot credit cards, which are backed by Citi Cards Canada. The couple then allegedly used the cards to buy “gift cards, appliances, home renovation products and other items,” the news release said. They applied for the cards using other people’s names and increased the limits to their maximum (that mathematically works out to about $30,000 per card), and they made payments using bad checks.

For those who may be wondering, the police say this is unrelated to the cyberattack on Home Depot’s payments system, which the company confirmed in September.

This sounds like a nightmare for Home Depot Canada and Citi Cards Canada, not to mention the people whose identities were used to apply for these cards. Not only was credit taken out in their name, but these cards were presumably maxed out, which is a credit killer. The Financial Consumer Agency of Canada recommends keeping credit utilization lower than 35% (credit scores are a little different for our northern neighbors, but their system is pretty similar to the one in the U.S.).

Regularly checking your credit is one of the best ways to spot identity theft like this, because you will notice a sudden drop in your credit scores, and your investigation may reveal fraud. You can get two of your credit scores for free on Credit.com, and checking your annual credit reports will also help you spot any accounts opened in your name (Canadians can request them for free, as can Americans). Reporting fraud not only protects your financial health, it also helps authorities find fraud patterns and stop crazy schemes like this one, ideally before they’ve cost someone $3 million.

More on Identity Theft:

Image: Stockbyte

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team