Home > Personal Finance > Are You Paying Your Nanny Illegally?

Comments 0 Comments

If you employ a nanny, chances are good that you’re paying him or her under the table.

Kerri Swope, senior director of Care.com HomePay estimates that just 20% of nannies are paid the way the U.S. government requires. Other sources put the estimate even lower. The chances of getting caught are slim — it usually happens when a nanny who is no longer needed files for unemployment and there is no work record, or if the employer is nominated for public office. And, as you might expect, some professions are much more likely to comply with tax laws: public figures, accountants, lawyers and doctors, or other professionals whose professional licenses or reputations might be at risk if they don’t

In many cases, nobody even mentions taxes during the process of hiring a nanny. And during hiring is the very best time to bring it up, Swope said. While many parents assume nannies do not want to be taxpaying employees, that’s not always the case. Because most nannies are still relatively young and may be getting established in life, they may not realize initially that their incomes won’t count when it comes to verifying income to buy a car, get a credit card or even a mortgage. And, should they lose a job — kids do grow up — they will be eligible for unemployment only if they were paid the right way.

But doing the right thing is far from easy. For one thing, compliance involves an astonishing amount of paperwork and time —about 55 hours a year for a typical family, Swope said. It also removes the possibility of hiring anyone who is not eligible to work in the U.S. (and that would leave out thousands of beloved family employees). Swope says the cost of a nanny may be about 20% more if paid legally, but tax breaks can offset some of that.

Besides a Schedule H (Household), there are quarterly state taxes and unemployment insurance, plus federal and Medicare taxes that all need to be accounted for. And the bookkeeping requirements are stringent. Some employers hope that filing a 1099, and classifying the nanny as a contractor, will cover it. (That means the nanny is self-employed and pays self-employment tax, rather than splitting the taxes with her employer.) Swope points out that this doesn’t fit with the IRS definition of a contract worker, who is generally able to decide when and where the work will be done.

Why Go the Legal Route?

Reasons to want to do it the right way would include wanting to avoid possible penalties (up to $25,000 in fines and a year in prison) or wanting to be sure that someone who has become an extension of your family is protected in his or her retirement years.

Some people want to come clean because “everyone else is doing it” is an excuse they won’t accept even from their kids — or they didn’t know there were ways to navigate the complicated tax system. (There are many DIY software services or payroll services can take care of the requirements for you, but that will add to your costs. Still, compliance will make you eligible to take advantage of tax breaks for child care expenses and it offers protections to the nanny as well.)

And if, as 2014 is coming to a close, you wish you had done things the right way, it’s not too late. Swope said most employers who decide near the end of the year that they want to comply with the law can still do it. In those cases, she said, they typically pay the nanny’s part of the taxes as well — an unexpected tax bill is hardly the surprise families want to give a trusted caregiver near the holidays.

And if you need to transition from under the table to aboveboard, Swope suggests letting the nanny know what’s in it for her. Being able to document a salary can be important, as can having a work record. Swope’s company has an online calculator that allows employees and employers to see how complying with the law is likely to affect paycheck size (some of it depends on how the worker fills out her W-4).

“Would you rather have $600 or $500?” is a pretty easy question to answer. However, “Are you willing to give up the ability to qualify for a loan, a year’s worth of employment history for Social Security benefit purposes and the right to collect unemployment benefits . . .?” Well, that’s a different question entirely.

More Money-Saving Reads:

Image: shironosov

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team