Home > Students > 4 Student Loan Debt Collection Tricks

Comments 1 Comment

Debt collectors have been known to use dirty tricks to get consumers to pay, but those collecting student loans have an especially powerful tool on their side. Unlike most other debt, student loan debt cannot be routinely discharged in bankruptcy. And depending on the type of loan, the debts can be collected through wage garnishments or even as deductions from Social Security checks. Student loan borrowers suffer from a decided lack of leverage when dealing with lenders and collectors.

This position of power emboldens student loan debt collectors. Perhaps that’s why, when the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau examined student loan servicing recently, it found a company that routinely called debtors at odd hours, violating federal law. In fact, one borrower received 48 such calls.

The massive student loan problem (there’s now more outstanding student loan debt than credit card debt) is an anchor that is severely hampering some young Americans from starting their adult lives. Roughly one-third of adults aged 18-31 live with their parents. Of course, it’s not the amount of the debt that’s the problem, it’s the number of former students who can’t pay the debt. Earlier this year, the Government Accountability Office said that about $94 billion — more than 11% of the federal student loan volume in repayment — was in default.

Most of those in-default consumers will end up in the hands of a debt collector. In fact, The Department of Education contracts with private debt collectors in an attempt to recover the debts. The agency estimates that in 2014, taxpayers and student loan borrowers will pay over $1 billion in commissions to student loan debt collectors, growing to over $2 billion by 2016.

For years, advocacy groups like the National Consumer Law Center having been trying to get student debt collectors, particularly those working for the Department of Education, to clean up their act. Advocates say that many do a poor job of explaining options to borrowers who fall behind, for example. A report issued by NCLC in September was heavily critical.

“The government’s use of debt collection agencies is short sighted in that promoting paths to success for struggling borrowers, especially those who are low income, is ultimately less costly for taxpayers than hammering them … the rest of their lives with draconian collection tools,” said National Consumer Law Center attorney and co-author Persis Yu.

Now, there is some new federal attention on student loan debt collection. The CFPB supervises student loan servicing at large banks, and in December, began supervising other kinds of student lenders, too.

Last week, the agency issued a supervisory report which offered examples of anti-borrower behavior in student loan collections, impacting both consumers who were up to date and those who were in default. Here is what they found:

1. ‘Inconvenient’ Calls

“In at least one examination, Supervision cited a student loan servicer for an unfair practice because its automated dialer routinely placed telephone calls to delinquent consumers in the early morning or late at night, which examiners determined was a form of harassment and an unfair practice. During the review, examiners identified more than 5,000 calls made at inconvenient times during a 45-day period, which included 48 inconvenient calls made to one consumer.”

2. Payment Allocation Designed to Maximize Late Fees

“CFPB examiners have reviewed how servicers allocate payments when a borrower pays less than the total amount due on all of the loans in the borrower’s account. Examiners found that partial payments were being allocated proportionally, or pro rata, among all the loans, resulting in all of the loans in a borrower’s account becoming delinquent. In instances that examiners observed, each loan in the account was then charged a minimum late fee. Taken together, these practices maximized the late fees for the consumer.”

3. Inflating Minimum Payment Requirements

“CFPB examiners identified a deceptive practice where a student loan servicer represented to consumers that an inflated minimum payment was due on periodic statements and online account statements. The minimum payment amount included accrued interest on loans that were still in deferment, which was therefore not actually due.”

4. Late Fees During Grace Period

“CFPB examiners found one or more supervised entities that were charging late fees when payments were received during the grace period. Like many other types of loans, many student loan contracts have grace periods after the due date. If a payment is received after the due date but during the grace period, the promissory note stated that late fees would not be charged. Examiners have found instances where late fees were being charged during the grace period.”

Unpaid student loan debt is serious business. It can damage a former student’s credit score for years, making it much harder to get other kinds of credit, such as a mortgage. It also leaves a black mark on their credit report visible to future employers, insurers, and every other entity that has access to it. (If you’re concerned about how your student loans are affecting your credit, you can see two of your credit scores for free on Credit.com.)

Paying off the debt is essential to moving on with life. So criticizing debt collection tactics, while legitimate, doesn’t improve things for debtors. What does? Getting the debt out of default by working out a reasonable repayment plan, something the CFPB is encouraging lenders to do. There are also forgiveness programs for graduates who work in certain fields, such as teachers who take jobs in low-income neighborhoods. And in extreme cases, despite what some lenders tell borrowers, it is possible to prove “undue hardship” in bankruptcy court and have student loans discharged.

So the calls might be rude, and consumers should exercise their rights to fair treatment, but no one with student loan debt should ignore the problem. It only gets bigger.

More on Managing Debt:

Image: diego_cervo

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • James Catron

    Dealing with debt collectors can be stressful, but there are laws to stop them from making your life a depression. Be suspicious of debt-related scams. You can report a debt collector who violates The Fair Debt Collection Practice Act to your state Attorney General’s office.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team