Home > 2014 > Managing Debt

What a Debt Collector’s Day Is Really Like

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 2 Comments

When I saw the recent New York Times article “A Debt Collector’s Day,” I was obviously intrigued to read it. Having worked nearly 4,000 days as a debt collector, I was looking forward to reading an article that actually depicted what we do for a living so readers would get a glimpse at what a debt collector really does. I read the article and a sampling of the author’s upcoming book on debt collectors, and it surely makes for an interesting story.

While the narrative is engaging, it represents only a small sampling of the debt collection industry from many years ago. While many would like to believe debt collectors are criminals, thugs and drug addicts, the majority of the 369,000 employees of the debt collection industry are in fact our neighbors and friends, grandparents and single parents, youth sports coaches and PTO volunteers. So upon finishing the article the question remained unanswered: What is a debt collector’s day like? I thought I’d try to shed a little more light on that.

A debt collector’s day starts off just like an average working American’s day: with a hot cup of coffee and maybe a little extra sugar. In most collection agencies, debt collectors kick off each day gathering with their managers for a quick meeting to generally update collectors on the current happenings, communicate the strategies and goals for the day, and end with a positive or motivational message to get the day off to a good start. Once the collectors get to their workstations they will log into their collection system and get to work. They’ll go over their individual work strategy for the current day, which includes reviewing consumer accounts they need to follow up on from previous conversations and identifying accounts to focus on for the rest of the day.

Planning the Day

A debt collector’s day is ultimately dictated by the strategy that is put in place by management. Debt collectors spend their day making outbound telephone calls, taking inbound telephone calls, and searching for updated information on consumers (which is known as “skip tracing”). Skip tracing is used to locate phone numbers and addresses for consumers when accounts are received without any good contact information. Debt collectors generally have access to several different resources that contain updated contact information on consumers normally compiled by credit reporting agencies and directory assistance databases. They will then use basic demographic information on the consumer from the account they are working to find updated contact information in order to reach the consumer and resolve the debt.

When making telephone calls, debt collectors have the odds stacked against them. Yet they find ways to continually help consumers resolve delinquent accounts. Most calls debt collectors make are to consumers who are not expecting their call. Once a consumer realizes a debt collector is on the other end of the line, that’s the last person the consumer wants to talk to. But by utilizing their extensive training and learned techniques, collectors work with the consumer to resolve their account.

Based on my experience, on average debt collectors are able to work out repayment of a debt with one out of every four consumers they speak with. For those productive collection calls there are always two factors in resolving the debt: the consumer’s willingness and ability to pay. Once the debt collector makes contact with a consumer it is important the consumer’s willingness to pay the debt is first established. Once that happens, the debt collector then works with the consumer to determine the consumer’s ability to pay through the different repayment options offered.

A debt collector’s composure is tried at least a couple times a day when dealing with an upset consumer. While most of the stories regarding harassing debt collection behavior are limited to debt collectors, it is not uncommon during the course of a normal day for debt collectors to be yelled at, cursed at and threatened by consumers through no fault of their own. However, debt collectors understand the frustration consumers face and know it is not directed at them personally, but at the situation.

Over the years, more emphasis has been placed on training debt collectors on conflict resolution. Training in this area is geared toward properly dealing with upset or irate consumers and focuses on the behavior of de-escalation. The goal for the debt collector in these circumstances is to identify through questions for understanding why the consumer is upset or irate and then specifically address their concern in a professional and respectful manner. On the flipside, consumers who feel upset when dealing with a specific debt collector should respectfully speak to that debt collector’s manager as most have been trained when a consumer requests to speak to a manager to do so without reservation.

When a Debt Collector’s Phone Rings

Throughout the day, debt collectors also answer many inbound calls as well. These calls come from what are called right parties, third parties and wrong parties. Right parties refer to the consumer of record (aka the person the debt collector has been trying to reach). Right parties or consumers call in for a variety of reasons such as to pay their debt, request more information about their debt, or maybe inform the debt collector to stop calling them. Third parties are those individuals who know or have a relationship with the consumer. Generally, they call in to provide updated information about the consumer or to tell the collector to stop calling them. Wrong parties are just that, the wrong person. As often as phone numbers change, it is very common for a debt collector to be calling a wrong phone number that used to be the right phone number for the consumer.

Regardless of how the media and the public portray our profession, as debt collectors we understand our roles are vital to the health of our credit-based economy. Debt collectors remain committed to turning difficult circumstances into positive experiences and do so millions of times each year.

This story is an Op/Ed contribution to Credit.com and does not necessarily represent the views of the company or its partners.

More on Managing Debt:

Image: Keith Brofsky

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • http://www.Credit.com/ Gerri Detweiler

    Thanks Brian!

  • Jonathan Baker

    Thanks for this insightful picture of a debt collectors day. It’s a good thing that you have covered both the good and the bad things about a debt collectors day. I know that the process of debt collection can be really hard. I had to call the GCY debt collection lawyers once to get the money I had lended to a person in Toronto. He had stopped paying me back for about 6 months. It was a tough job for them but they succeeded. I genuinely respect these peoples because life isn’t very easy for them. And people think of them as cruel, heartless person which they are not.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team