Home > 2014 > Credit Cards

Should You Sign Your Credit Card?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 0 Comments

Take a close look at the back of your credit card, and you will  probably see something along the lines of “Not valid unless signed.” At the same time, there are many cardholders who believe that they should not sign their credit cards for one of several reasons.

Some think signing the back of their card gives potential thieves a copy of their signature to use to forge their name. Others believe that they are better protected by writing “See ID” in their card’s signature panel. So what is a smart cardholder to do?

Sign Your Card

The whole point of a signature is not that it is a secret symbol known only to you, but that only you can accurately duplicate it on command. It is not that hard for anyone can see a copy of your signature from public records, from a canceled check, and of course, from the credit card receipts you must sign. The hard part is quickly and precisely forging a signature on a register receipt. A thief might be able to fool a cashier in a hurry, but the signature will easily be identified as a forgery if the cardholder contests the charge.

Another reason to sign the card is that merchants are not supposed to accept a credit card unless it is signed. Certainly, that is what is implied by the “not valid unless signed” message on the back of the card. In addition, payment networks tell merchants that the signature is required. For example, look at this document that MasterCard posts on its website warning, “MasterCard rules and security procedures require that credit cards must be signed by the cardholder in order to be accepted for payment.” This document even addresses situations where the signature panel is filled in with “Ask for Photo I.D.” by advising merchants that “The transaction cannot be processed unless the cardholder’s signature appears in the signature space.” For its part, Visa does not even allow merchants to make the display of photo ID a condition of card acceptance.

Beyond Signatures

While the terms of credit card use couldn’t be more clear, the reality is that few cashiers bother to examine the signature on the back of a credit card. Furthermore, many merchants no longer require a signature for smaller transactions, and there is no way to provide a signature for transactions authorized over the telephone or through the Internet.

Additionally, the recent string of high-profile security breaches at retailers across the nation have put a spotlight on the outdated security measures employed by the credit card industry. For example, criminals who obtain credit card numbers can easily clone these cards and don’t even have to accurately reproduce your signature on the back, just their own version of yours.

The next generation of credit cards will ultimately use the chip-and-PIN system, which negates the need to ever sign the back of your credit card, or your receipt. Instead, cardholders will enter their credit card’s four-digit personal identification number, just like they currently do with their ATM and debit cards.

If you’re worried about credit card security, be sure to monitor your financial accounts regularly for signs of unauthorized charges. You may also want to keep an eye on your credit scores for signs of new account fraud (when an identity thief opens an account in your name). You can check your credit scores for free every month on Credit.com.

So instead of asking whether you should sign your credit card, just do it for now, if only so you can tell future generations about the novelty.

More on Credit Cards:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team