Home > Identity Theft > How One Artist Turned the Tables on Her Identity Thief

Comments 0 Comments

A year after her wallet was stolen from a gallery in San Francisco, photographer Jessamyn Lovell received a call from the police. They asked her two puzzling questions: Did she know a woman named Erin Hart, and did she give her permission to use her ID? Lovell didn’t know what to think — who is Erin Hart? She has my ID?

It turns out Hart tried using the ID to check into a San Francisco hotel, but it wasn’t the first time she’d used it. According to court documents, Hart had used Lovell’s license — and her identity — to rent a car in San Francisco (the credit card she used belonged to another victim). Lovell also received a court summons from Oakland, Calif., for traffic violations Hart committed under her name.

“That is when I really got upset,” Lovell told Credit.com. “I was really mad at this woman, because it cost me a lot of time and energy and expense.”

Lovell needed to prove she wasn’t involved. She embarked on a mission that would eventually take her thousands of miles, going back and forth from her home in Albuquerque to Oakland and San Francisco, with a suitcase full of documents designed to prove her innocence. The journey turned out to be about much more than that — it evolved into a fascinating hybrid of art and revenge.

Transforming Frustration Into Art

Hart pleaded guilty Aug. 29, 2011, of falsely impersonating Lovell and using a credit card without the cardholder’s consent. Her sentence included a yearlong stint in the county jail.

Even after Hart received her sentence, Lovell couldn’t get the incident out of her head: Why did this woman hold on to her ID? What about her life led her to use someone else’s identity? She hired a private investigator to learn more about Hart, following her artistic instincts. She mentioned to her friends at SF Camerawork how she had been compiling a collection of details about Hart, and they suggested she show it in the gallery, because that’s where Jessamyn’s wallet was stolen — where her ordeal began. With an exhibit in the future, Lovell was motivated to dig deeper into the question that had nagged her for months: Who is Erin Hart?

Lovell stood outside the county jail when Hart was released after serving a year for her crimes. She took a photo, one in a collection of videos, mug shots, photos and arrest reports compiled by Lovell in an exhibit called “Dear Erin Hart,” which will be on view through Oct. 18 at San Francisco Camerawork, the gallery from which her wallet was stolen in October 2009. You can see some of the pieces here.

Lovell says she invited Hart to the opening reception, but she didn’t show. As of early October, she hadn’t come by, but if she did, Hart would likely be alarmed at what she saw. Most people would feel unnerved if they went to an art gallery and saw years’ worth of information about and photos of themselves, blown up and displayed for anyone to see.

“Using a camera and occupying the varied roles of victim, stalker, investigator, artist, spy and vigilante, Lovell offers a body of work that touches on contemporary concerns of surveillance and selfhood within the information age,” reads a description of her exhibit on SF Camerawork’s website.

More than 2.1 million Americans sent identity theft complaints to the Federal Trade Commission last year, according to an FTC annual report on the subject, and while Lovell’s experience isn’t a unique one, her response certainly is. If Hart knew about it, Lovell’s project might stir in her some similar questions: Who is this woman? Why is she doing this to me?

Such feelings are common, said Will Marling, executive director of the National Organization for Victim Assistance. People want to understand what has happened to them and why, but everyone deals with that struggle differently, Marling said, and as someone who works with victims of all sorts of crimes, including identity theft, he said it’s not his place to define their journeys.

“The idea really is that people can really learn to ventilate using whatever means they have available to them,” Marling said. He said there are myriad ways people can choose to deal with what happened, and that’s OK, as long as they’re not putting themselves in harm’s way or breaking laws.

Lovell’s work doesn’t seem to cross those boundaries, but it’s not really over yet.

A Mix of Anger & Empathy

From victim to stalker (as she herself says) — it’s certainly creative, if not a little disturbing, but Lovell’s intention wasn’t malicious, she says. She, like many victims of identity theft, says she wanted to understand the motivations of her perpetrator.

“I didn’t mean for it to be a public shaming of her,” Lovell said, but as her project gained attention, she started hearing from people who grew up with Hart, people who knew her from many years ago. They’re very different, Lovell said, but she also saw similarities between herself and Hart, motivating her learn more.

“I feel a little bit conflicted when someone sees this project as my sort of avenging this crime,” Lovell said. “It was all really in the service of building a picture of her so I could understand why she would do what she did.”

More than anything, Lovell wants to meet Hart. Through the private investigator she hired to help her piece together her image of Hart, Lovell found out where she lived and went there to hand-deliver an invitation to the exhibit. No one answered when she knocked. Credit.com used public records to find a few of Hart’s previous phone numbers, but they were out of service. We tried to contact a previous roommate and her public defender, as well, but as Lovell has experienced, Hart is difficult to find. Ever since Lovell decided she wanted to meet Hart, the woman has eluded her.

In the exhibit, photos and videos tell the story of Lovell’s work to clear her name and the woman who briefly hijacked it, but at the end, there’s a letter: It’s a handwritten note from Lovell to Hart.

“It’s a personal appeal to her to connect with me, that I’m not trying to do anything to hurt her,” Lovell said. “I just hope that she gets a chance to read the letter.”

The letter is sealed, but should Hart show up at SF Camerawork, the staff has been instructed to give it to her.

“I did have a genuine hope that she would come,” Lovell said, after Hart didn’t come to the opening. “I know it was a little naïve, but it’s still my hope she’ll come.”

More on Identity Theft:

Image by Laura Kenward; provided courtesy of Jessamyn Lovell

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team