Home > 2014 > Students

How to Get Your Student Loans Forgiven in Bankruptcy

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 2 Comments

“Student loans can’t be discharged in bankruptcy,” has been repeated so often that it’s practically considered gospel. But what if that “fact” is not completely correct – and may be stopping consumers who could benefit from bankruptcy from pursuing it?

It’s not just consumers and the media that may be misled. “A wide number of bankruptcy attorneys are convinced that student loans can’t be discharged under bankruptcy and never even try to include them or pursue an adversary hearing to go for the discharge,” writes Steve Rhode who has been writing about discharging debt in bankruptcy at his website GetOutOfDebt.org.

Most Don’t Even Ask

Rhode points to research by Jason Iuliano, who delved into this issue as a Ph.D. student at Princeton University. (He also holds a law degree from Harvard.) Iuliano found that nearly 40% of student borrowers who seek a discharge get one, but that many borrowers don’t bother to ask. In fact, less than 1% of those who file for bankruptcy attempt to include these loans. “The real failing of the student loan discharge process is lack of participation by those in need,” he wrote in his research paper, An Empirical Assessment of Student Loan Discharges and the Undue Hardship Standard.

Yes, it can be difficult to wipe out student loans by filing for bankruptcy, but it’s not always impossible, and some consumers who might be able to eliminate student loan debt don’t even try. That can leave a borrower saddled with debt for decades, which not only hurts their credit rating but also leaves them in a situation where their balances just continue to grow.

To get rid of student loans through bankruptcy, debtors must file something called (ominmously) an “adversary proceeding” in which they have to prove that paying back their student loans would constitute an “undue hardship” on the debtor and the debtor’s dependents. But because Congress didn’t spell out what constituted an undue hardship, that job has fallen to the courts to interpret. And not surprisingly, various judges have held various positions on the issue.

The Major Factors

Looking at a variety of factors, Iuliano found only three that he said were “statistically significant across a wide variety of models”:

  • whether the debtor has a medical hardship;
  • whether the debtor is employed;
  • and the debtor’s income the year before filing bankruptcy.

Those who had a medical hardship were more likely to be successful in obtaining a total or partial discharge, and it did not appear that there was a significant difference between mental illness, physical disability or chronic illness. As far as income and employment are concerned, there “is a clear and substantial dropoff in income as one proceeds from no discharge ($28,272) to partial discharge ($20,072) and, finally, to full discharge ($16,394),” he wrote.

Is it possible that the perception that loans can’t be wiped out in bankruptcy has become a self-fulfilling prophecy? Debtors think it’s impossible, so they don’t try. As a result, the number of successful cases remains small.

In his sample, Iuliano found that 25% received full discharges (meaning all their student loan debt was wiped out) and an additional 14% received partial discharges. While that’s not a majority, it’s certainly more than many people might expect. Also surprising was the finding that borrowers who represented themselves (pro se) were a little more likely to be successful than those who were represented by attorneys.

He noted that some borrowers pursued other options such as Income Contingent Repayment, but calls them a “poor substitute” for bankruptcy because they can result in a borrower paying for years, only to potentially owe taxes on any debt that is forgiven at the end of the program.

The National Consumer Law Center has criticized the findings of this study, pointing out that it can be expensive and difficult for borrowers to try to get a discharge. Some student loan holders and their agents very aggressively fight discharges and borrowers who may need this relief may not be able to afford to file for bankruptcy, much less afford the additional costs involved in bringing a hardship discharge adversary proceeding. And, of course, there is by no means any guarantee of success.

Student loan borrowers who are trying to get out of debt should consider all their available options including loan forgiveness programs, income-based repayment and more flexible repayment plans. But they may also want to look into bankruptcy. By not doing so, they may be missing an opportunity for a truly fresh start.

“One cannot help but wonder why more people in bankruptcy do not seek to discharge their student loans,” Iuliano wrote. And Rhode is even more blunt, urging consumers to take action. “More consumers should pursue a student loan discharge in bankruptcy,” he wrote.

Before you file, make sure you’re aware of how a bankruptcy can affect your credit. A bankruptcy will remain on your credit report for up to 10 years and can drop your credit scores significantly. If you want to get an idea of where you currently stand, you can see your credit scores for free every month on Credit.com.

More on Student Loans:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Jurassic Carl

    NCLC is correct. it’s easy for a lawyer to criticize bankrupt clients to be able to afford an attorney at $250-$400 an hour for God knows how many hours it would take to litigate the adversary proceeding. That could easily cost $10K just to roll the dice. Right now, with the Brunner test being the major litmus test, even if you magically come up with that kind of money (a bankruptcy client probably already borrowed $2K for the Chapter 7 already), the client has to be blind, crippled, or crazy and prove to the court that he/she will never make money again.

    The simplest solution is partially in the Harkin Education Act and in the Warren bill that failed. The special exemption should be removed from bankruptcy law and loans should be able to be refinanced. The fatal flaw of the Warren bill, though, is that defaulted federal loans can’t be refinanced, and that private loans can’t be converted to federal ones if they are defaulted. Harkin’s private loan bankruptcy fix is a partial solution.

    In the long term, we will all have to figure out how to get cheaper educations, because college degrees have become as useful as HS diplomas in the job market. Sure, graduates make more in the long term, but at what cost? Jobs have been come nearly unobtainable in this country. I’m not sure if you’ve noticed, but the economy has reached a new Gilded Age where only the elite can truly afford college – because their parents can just cut a check to their Ivy League alma maters.

  • Alexia

    I pay my student loans under the income based payment plans and I still never have any money and I have a good job too. Because of all my student loan payment I can’t afford a new car and my car is dying. I can’t even save any money, I barely have enough left a month for gas and groceries. We can’t afford to have children because of our student loan debt, I have great credit but can’t afford to buy anything, we can’t even save for a house. I would return my diploma to have no student loan debt. It’s not worth it! It’s all from my Master’s degree which these days means nothing, companies want experience not degrees. So I’m damned if I do and damned if I don’t. Garnish my wages for federal student loans. We don’t have the money to pay it back to begin with, why not bail out student loans instead of Wall Street! I feel like I can never truly live!

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team