Home > Managing Debt > Are You Dealing With a Real Debt Collector?

Comments 1 Comment

Some less-than-above-board debt collectors deploy a number of unsavory tactics while trying to persuade consumers to give them money, but none worse than this: trying to collect on debts that just don’t exist.

It happens, often. Sometimes, bad records are to blame. Debt notes are often sold, re-sold and re-sold again, and during that game of telephone, something gets lost in the translation and a consumer gets unnecessarily harassed. But that’s not what we’re talking about today.

We’re talking about outright fraud. An aggressive collector calls a person and simply harasses him or her into coughing up some dough. Let’s call that phantom debt. That happens a lot, too. Just last week in the Debt Collection Files, we wrote about a company that submitted potentially millions of falsified documents in an attempt to collect bogus debts on long-since-closed checking accounts.

Chasing Down Fake Collectors

Jason Krumbein is a Richmond, Va.-based lawyer who often represents consumers in debt collection cases. He also spends a lot of time trying to find collectors who bug his clients over phantom payday loan debts.

“I get a call about this one to four times each week… (There are) six I am currently looking for,” he said. “I can’t figure out who is actually doing the collecting. It used to sound like they were in India, but now it sounds like they are in the U.S. But that could just mean they went to the ‘A’ team.”

Finding the source of the phone calls is important, because until Krumbein figures out who’s collecting, he can’t sue them for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

“Ordinarily what happens is a collector calls saying, ‘You need to give me a credit card, or someone (from law enforcement) will show up at your house in an hour,’” he said. Intimidated victims often pay hundreds of dollars.

The fake payday debt scam has been making the rounds for a long time. Credit.com covered it back in 2012. It’s simple: consumers get an aggressive call threatening them with jail time or a mandatory county court appearance if they don’t cough up a credit card number or other form of payment on the spot. How do collectors pick victims? Sometimes the debts are old and invalid because of the statute of limitations; sometimes the consumer visited a website to inquire about a payday loan but never received one; and sometimes, the consumer is just an unlucky target. But each call follows the same pattern: The collector refuses to disclose even basic information, such as their mailing address or phone number.

The Federal Trade Commission has filed six different cases against phantom payday debt collectors, most recently in July, when it stopped a Georgia-based operation from attempting to collect on $3.5 million in phantom debt.

“Many consumers in this case were victimized twice,” said the FTC’s Jessica Rich back in July. “First, when they inquired about payday loans online and their personal information was not properly safeguarded, and later, when they were harassed and intimidated by these defendants, to whom they didn’t owe any money.”

But despite the attention, and run-ins with federal authorities, the scam persists, which means only one thing: It works. Criminals wouldn’t keep trying it if people didn’t pay.

Just last month, the FTC sued a payday loan operation called the Hydra group which allegedly used the unique strategy of beginning its scam by placing money into consumers’ checking accounts before beginning to withdraw regular payments without authorization. When consumers stopped the payments, Hydra allegedly sold the “debts” to third parties who engaged in phantom collection.

The Fake Debt Collector M.O.

Phantom payday debt collectors generally commit a laundry list of violations. Here’s the list from the Georgia case, according to the FTC:

“In addition to the deception and false threats, the defendants violated federal law by telling consumers’ family members, employers, and co-workers about the debt; failing to identify themselves as debt collectors; using profanity; making repeated inconvenient or prohibited calls; failing to provide information in writing about the debt; and making unauthorized withdrawals from consumers’ bank accounts.”

That makes fake payday debt collectors an easy private lawsuit target — if they can be found.

“I’ve found two so far,” Krumbein said. “One paid, and the other one I have a judgment on, but I need to get a garnishment order for that.”

One thing that makes the scam seem a bit more legitimate to victims: The calls appear to be coming from U.S.-based phone numbers. Krumbein said they are actually Magic Jack or cellphone numbers, however, meaning the callers could really be anywhere.

“Tracking down who is calling is approaching impossible,” he said with a sigh. “I have a whole bulletin board of cases where I have to go figure out if it’s anybody that we can chase.”

The key takeaway from the persistent payday debt collection scam is this: Many people can be intimidated into paying debts they don’t owe. Many of you Credit.com readers are savvy about your rights, and you probably think you’d never fall for this. Even if that’s true, no doubt you can imagine a friend or family member – particularly someone elderly – who might be duped this way. That’s why it’s so important for you and everyone you know to understand consumer rights created by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Here’s a great list of them. But in short, when a debt collector calls, stop their monologue immediately. Tell them to mail you evidence of the debt, in writing, and then tell them never to contact you again unless it’s to provide a legal notice, mentioning that if they violate that request, they will be in violation of federal law.

You can also check your credit reports (you can get your credit reports for free once a year) for legitimate collection accounts as well. However, keep in mind that credit report errors can occur also, and if you spot a collection account you don’t recognize, you can dispute the error with the credit bureau. Collection accounts can be a major drag on your credit scores, and you can see if any debts are impacting your scores for free on Credit.com.

More on Managing Debt:

Image: Wavebreakmedia Ltd

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team