Home > 2014 > Credit Score

Are Credit Scores Just a Scam?

Advertiser Disclosure Comments 3 Comments

It sounds like something straight out of the conspiracy theorist’s playbook: a secret system that enslaves average citizens who don’t even know what’s really happening.

There are some consumers who believe that’s exactly what credit scores are designed to do: keep consumers enslaved in debt.

It’s easy to understand why some people feel this way. Our reader who goes by the screen name “gentile” has been trying to refinance his mortgage but can’t qualify.  I “am not in their financial mold, don’t adhere to their criteria, so I will find another avenue, BUT IT WILL NOT BE THE CROOKED BANKS & CROOKED CREDIT RATINGS,” he writes.

Questions about the current system can be compelling. Why do problems that happened years ago still keep someone from getting credit? Why don’t lenders look at borrowers’ complete finances including their income and their assets? Why does it have to be so hard — and take so long — to rebuild or build credit?

Jewel, who commented on a story that explained that one late payment can drop your credit score by 50 points or more, said:

It’s because it allows credit companies to have higher interest rates and thus they can charge more for any money provided.

In one sense she’s right: Credit scores are designed to help lenders make more money. Sure, a banker might talk in terms of “better decisions,” or a faster application process, or the ability to approve more consumers for loans. But ultimately that boils down to one thing — more profitable lending.

Finding the ‘Right’ Borrowers

But to be profitable, lenders have to do a couple of things right. One is that they have to extend credit to a large number of customers. The size of the customer base will vary by lender; it will be much smaller for a community bank, for example, than for a large national credit card issuer. But nevertheless, to make money, they have to have a sufficient number of customers who are paying interest or generating income from fees (including merchant fees and credit and debit card transactions).

They also have to minimize losses. Once they extend credit, it’s hard to take it back. And so accounting for an acceptable level of risk is something that also has to be incorporated into the lending decision in the first place.

Finally, they have to be competitive or at least some of their customer base will go elsewhere — choosing other lenders, or deciding to simply get out of debt.

And that’s where credit scores come into play. They are an efficient and — depending on whom you ask — effective, tool for making lots of decisions quickly. They are only one part of the decision-making process, but they often they play a significant role in whether consumers get credit and how much they pay for it.

For those who were been blindsided by America’s recent economic woes, being stuck with a bad credit score is especially painful.

However, the companies that develop credit scores explain that recent information carries a lot of weight because they have found it to be more predictive.

Another problem is that people often find credit scores confusing. That’s not surprising either. Even a simple question like, “How many credit scores are there?” can be perplexing. At any given time, there are dozens of scores that could be ordered by lender evaluating an application. And just when you think you understand how the work, changes like FICO 9 — the new version of FICO scores — are announced.

“They’ll just change the rules again like they always do when people start doing better,” writes our reader who goes by the screen name Kde-girl. “You can’t win with this stuff, it’s programmed for the failure of some.”

While she may feel lenders are against her, the lenders themselves aren’t trying to exclude customers as much as they are trying to find customers they can lend to profitably. Yes, they say, they want to weed out bad credit risks, but they also want to find customers who do qualify.

Consumers can react to credit scores in a variety of ways:

  • Try to ignore them, pay cash for everything, and hope they won’t need a score in the future
  • Give up, ignore bills and just hope for the best, or
  • Take a proactive approach to their credit, and try to make it as strong as possible, with the understanding that sometimes that process takes time.

If you decide to take the latter approach, you want to make sure you review your free annual credit report and monitor your credit for free which you can do at Credit.com. Improve the things you can improve, and try not to give up if it seems like you’re making slow progress. Over time, negative information carries less weight — and eventually goes away. Time seems to speed up as you get older, and this is a case where that can help. “Credit score is a game you can play,” says our reader Eric.

More on Credit Reports and Credit Scores:

Image: iStock

Comments on articles and responses to those comments are not provided or commissioned by a bank advertiser. Responses have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by a bank advertiser. It is not a bank advertiser's responsibility to ensure all posts and/or questions are answered.

Please note that our comments are moderated, so it may take a little time before you see them on the page. Thanks for your patience.

  • Mark

    When things such as “having higher credit limits on credit cards” will increase your credit score, and owing less on loans real property decreases your credit score it’s really hard not to view this as the obvious scam on consumers that it is. The things that actually should show a person to be financially reliable and give them a higher score gives them a lower one. It IS a scam. The scam is to try and make people be into a fairly high amount of debt simply to have this credit score number climb, and it only benefits the lenders, not the borrower.

  • tim

    There is something very wrong with a system where where three different bureaus have three wildly different scores for the same person at the same time and one can only guess which one a particular lender will pull. I wouldn’t buy a thermometer that measured the same temperature differently by as much a 100 degrees. NOT acceptable! Why should consumers have to put up with this?

  • VJ

    Credit score should consider non collateral loans not others, when refinancing a loan credit score should not come into play only thing need to consider history of specific loan. Once you take higher rates loan your credit score will down because banks don’t allow you to go back to other lenders and make your interest lower. credit bureau and banks are mafia in this area and govt support this system, nobody here to help common man here

Certain credit cards and other financial products mentioned in this and other articles on Credit.com News & Advice may also be offered through Credit.com product pages, and Credit.com will be compensated if our users apply for and ultimately sign up for any of these cards or products. However, this relationship does not result in any preferential editorial treatment.

Hello, Reader!

Thanks for checking out Credit.com. We hope you find the site and the journalism we produce useful. We wanted to take some time to tell you a bit about ourselves.

Our People

The Credit.com editorial team is staffed by a team of editors and reporters, each with many years of financial reporting experience. We’ve worked for places like the New York Times, American Banker, Frontline, TheStreet.com, Business Insider, ABC News, NBC News, CNBC and many others. We also employ a few freelancers and more than 50 contributors (these are typically subject matter experts from the worlds of finance, academia, politics, business and elsewhere).

Our Reporting

We take great pains to ensure that the articles, video and graphics you see on Credit.com are thoroughly reported and fact-checked. Each story is read by two separate editors, and we adhere to the highest editorial standards. We’re not perfect, however, and if you see something that you think is wrong, please email us at editorial team [at] credit [dot] com,

The Credit.com editorial team is committed to providing our readers and viewers with sound, well-reported and understandable information designed to inform and empower. We won’t tell you what to do. We will, however, do our best to explain the consequences of various actions, thereby arming you with the information you need to make decisions that are in your best interests. We also write about things relating to money and finance we think are interesting and want to share.

In addition to appearing on Credit.com, our articles are syndicated to dozens of other news sites. We have more than 100 partners, including MSN, ABC News, CBS News, Yahoo, Marketwatch, Scripps, Money Magazine and many others. This network operates similarly to the Associated Press or Reuters, except we focus almost exclusively on issues relating to personal finance. These are not advertorial or paid placements, rather we provide these articles to our partners in most cases for free. These relationships create more awareness of Credit.com in general and they result in more traffic to us as well.

Our Business Model

Credit.com’s journalism is largely supported by an e-commerce business model. Rather than rely on revenue from display ad impressions, Credit.com maintains a financial marketplace separate from its editorial pages. When someone navigates to those pages, and applies for a credit card, for example, Credit.com will get paid what is essentially a finder’s fee if that person ends up getting the card. That doesn’t mean, however, that our editorial decisions are informed by the products available in our marketplace. The editorial team chooses what to write about and how to write about it independently of the decisions and priorities of the business side of the company. In fact, we maintain a strict and important firewall between the editorial and business departments. Our mission as journalists is to serve the reader, not the advertiser. In that sense, we are no different from any other news organization that is supported by ad revenue.

Visitors to Credit.com are also able to register for a free Credit.com account, which gives them access to a tool called The Credit Report Card. This tool provides users with two free credit scores and a breakdown of the information in their Experian credit report, updated twice monthly. Again, this tool is entirely free, and we mention that frequently in our articles, because we think that it’s a good thing for users to have access to data like this. Separate from its educational value, there is also a business angle to the Credit Report Card. Registered users can be matched with products and services for which they are most likely to qualify. In other words, if you register and you find that your credit is less than stellar, Credit.com won’t recommend a high-end platinum credit card that requires an excellent credit score You’d likely get rejected, and that’s no good for you or Credit.com. You’d be no closer to getting a product you need, there’d be a wasted inquiry on your credit report, and Credit.com wouldn’t get paid. These are essentially what are commonly referred to as "targeted ads" in the world of the Internet. Despite all of this, however, even if you never apply for any product, the Credit Report Card will remain free, and none of this will impact how the editorial team reports on credit and credit scores.

Our Owners

Credit.com is owned by Progrexion Holdings Inc. which is the owner and administrator of a number of business related to credit and credit repair, including CreditRepair.com, and eFolks. In addition, Progrexion also provides services to Lexington Law Firm as a third party provider. Despite being owned by Progrexion, it is not the role of the Credit.com editorial team to advocate the use of the company’s other services. In articles, reporters may mention credit repair as an option, for example, but we’ll also be sure to note the various alternatives to that service. Furthermore, you may see ads for credit repair services on Credit.com, but the editorial team isn’t responsible for the creation or implementation of those ads, anymore than reporters for the New York Times or Washington Post are responsible for the ads on their sites.

Your Stories

Lastly, much of what we do is informed by our own experiences as well as the experiences of our readers. We want to tell your stories if you’re interested in sharing them. Please email us at story ideas [at] credit [dot] com with ideas or visit us on Facebook or Twitter.

Thanks for stopping by.

- The Credit.com Editorial Team